Poliklinika Novakov i sar.
Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia
NCT Number: NCT04417413
The objective of the study is to retrospectively collect the data on patients who underwent pelvic organ prolapse treatment using a non-ablative Er:YAG laser with SMOOTH mode and to conduct an objective evaluation of safety and efficacy of Er:YAG laser treatment. In a group of patients that have concomitant stress urinary incontinence symptoms, the effectiveness of the treatments on these symptoms will be evaluated as well.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Observational
Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affect many women and can dramatically decrease their quality of life. Most of the patients diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence also have a degree of pelvic organ prolapse and vice-versa.
One of the more promising new approaches in treating disorders connected to pelvic floor dysfunction has been the introduction of vaginal erbium laser treatment for pelvic organ prolapse.
The primary aim of the present retrospective study was toassess the effectiveness of vaginal erbium laser with SMOOTH mode for the treatment of patients with pelvic organ prolapse and co-existing stress urinary incontinence, if present.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
All patients that had pelvic organ prolapse with or without concomitant stress urinary incontinence and that were treated using non-ablative Fotona Er:YAG laser (ProlapLase treatment) in the time period from 2015 to 2016 will be included in this retrospective study.
Exclusion criteria
Patients who failed to attend a follow-up appointment will be excluded from this retrospective case series study.
Non-ablative SMOOTH mode intravaginal Er:YAG teratment for pelvic organ prolapse
Time frame: Before and at all follow ups (up to 3 months after last treatment)
Assesment of POP grade using Baden-Walker scale
Time frame: Before and at all follow ups (up to 3 months after last treatment)
assessment of SUI severity using ICIQ-UI questionnaire
Time frame: Before and at all follow ups (up to 3 months after last treatment)
Assesment of adverse effects
Time frame: Before and at all follow ups (up to 3 months after last treatment)
Assesment of patient satisfaction using 0-10 VAS scale
Aleksandra Novakov Mikic
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05688059
Cystocele, Female Urogenital Diseases
Morristown, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06744972
Cystocele, Disease Attributes
View Trial DetailsNCT01393171
Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse, Cystocele
Downey, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02431897
Cystocele, Female Urogenital Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details