Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00794664

Safety and Efficacy of Mipomersen in Patients With Severe Hypercholesterolemia on a Maximally Tolerated Lipid-Lowering Regimen and Who Are Not on Apheresis

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dosing with mipomersen for 26 weeks in treating severely hypercholesterolemic patients who are on a maximally tolerated lipid-lowering regimen and who are not on apheresis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Hypercholesterolemia is characterized by markedly elevated low density lipoproteins (LDL). Elevated LDL is a major risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD).

Mipomersen is an antisense drug that reduces a protein in the liver cells called apolipoprotein B (Apo-B). Apo-B plays a role in producing low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (the "bad" cholesterol) and moving it from the liver to one's bloodstream. High LDL-C is an independent risk factor for the development of coronary heart disease (CHD) or other diseases of blood vessels. It has been shown that lowering LDL-C reduces the risk of heart attacks and other major adverse cardiovascular events. The purpose of this study is to determine whether mipomersen safely and effectively lowers LDL-C in severely hypercholesterolemic patients who are on a maximally tolerated lipid-lowering regimen and who are not on apheresis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Fasting LDL-C ≥200 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L) at screening and the presence of at least 1 of the following criteria:
  • Myocardial infarction (MI)
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)
  • Coronary artery disease documented by angiography or any other accepted imaging technique
  • Positive exercise test (≥1 mm ST-depression at maximal exercise or test terminated because of angina) or a perfusion defect (e.g., thallium or single photon emission computed tomography)
  • Other clinical atherosclerotic diseases: peripheral artery disease, symptomatic carotid artery disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm
  • Or, if alternative above were not met, fasting LDL-C ≥300 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L)
  • On stable, maximally tolerated statin therapy for 8 weeks
  • On stable, medication from an additional class of hypolipidemic agents for 8 weeks.
  • On stable, low fat diet for 12 weeks
  • Stable weight for 6 weeks

Exclusion criteria

  • Significant health problems in the recent past including heart attack, stroke, coronary syndrome, unstable angina, heart failure, significant arrhythmia, hypertension, blood disorders, liver disease, cancer, digestive disorders, Type I diabetes, or uncontrolled Type II diabetes
  • Apheresis within 3 months prior to Screening or expected to start apheresis during the treatment phase

Treatment and study plan

mipomersen

Drug

200 mg (1 mL), weekly subcutaneous injections for 26 weeks

Other names: ISIS 301012, Mipomersen sodium, Kynamro™

Placebo

Drug

1 mL weekly subcutaneous injections for 26 weeks

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    LDL-C was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. For patients with triglycerides <400 mg/dL, LDL-C was obtained using Friedewald's calculation; and for patients with triglycerides >=400 mg/dL, LDL-C was directly measured by the central laboratory using ultracentrifugation. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  2. LDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Primary Efficacy Time Point

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    Apo-B was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  2. Apo-B at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  3. Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    Total cholesterol was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  4. Total Cholesterol at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  5. Percentage Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    Non-HDL-C was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  6. Non-HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

Other outcomes

  1. Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    Triglycerides were measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  2. Triglycerides at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  3. Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    Lipoprotein(a) was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  4. Lipoprotein(a) at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  5. Percentage Change From Baseline in Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    VLDL-C was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  6. VLDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  7. Change From Baseline in Ratio of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) to High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    LDL-C and HDL-C were measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  8. Ratio of LDL-C to HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  9. Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo-A1) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    Apo-A1 was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  10. Apo-A1 at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  11. Percentage Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    HDL-C was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  12. HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET)

    Time frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28

    The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kastle Therapeutics, LLC

Industry

Collaborators

  • Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Mipomersen in Patients With Severe Hypercholesterolemia on a Maximally Tolerated Lipid-Lowering Regimen and Who Are Not on Apheresis

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Nov 20, 2008
Registry last updated
Sep 9, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.