Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07754877

Safety and Efficacy of Microwave Ablation Alone Versus Microwave Ablation Combined With Chemical Ablation in the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids: A Prospective, Multicenter Study

Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumors in women of reproductive age, with a prevalence of 20%-50%, often causing menorrhagia, anemia, pelvic pain, and pressure symptoms that markedly impair quality of life. Current treatments include pharmacological therapy (GnRH-a, mifepristone) - effective temporarily but with high recurrence after discontinuation; surgical myomectomy or hysterectomy - definitive yet invasive, with prolonged recovery and potential fertility compromise; and minimally invasive therapies such as uterine artery embolization (UAE), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and microwave ablation (MWA), which are increasingly favored for their minimal invasiveness and rapid recovery.

MWA delivers thermal energy via a percutaneously inserted antenna under ultrasound guidance, inducing coagulative necrosis of fibroid tissue through temperatures exceeding 60°C. Advantages include minimal trauma (~2 mm puncture), rapid recovery (discharge within 1-2 days), uterine preservation, and negligible ovarian impact. However, a key limitation is the heat sink effect: in hypervascular fibroids, flowing blood dissipates thermal energy, resulting in incomplete ablation, prolonged procedural time, and higher energy requirements - particularly challenging for fibroids >5 cm in diameter.

Chemical ablation involves intralesional injection of a sclerosing agent (e.g., lauromacrogol), which damages vascular endothelial cells, causing vascular occlusion, thrombosis, ischemic necrosis, and direct membrane disruption that accelerates apoptosis. Theoretically, pre-ablation chemical sclerotherapy may occlude feeding vessels, attenuate the heat sink effect, and enhance subsequent thermal ablation efficiency. Supporting this concept, an ex vivo bovine liver study demonstrated that pre-injection of 5 mL of 99.5% ethanol around the electrode prior to radiofrequency ablation produced a significantly larger ablation zone at equivalent energy levels compared with ablation alone. Small-sample clinical studies, including a prospective cohort from Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, have preliminarily explored combined chemical ablation plus MWA for uterine fibroids, suggesting improved ablation rates and shorter procedural times, though findings require validation through high-quality randomized controlled trials.

Therefore, the investigators conducted this multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial to rigorously compare the safety (incidence and severity of adverse events) and efficacy (fibroid volume reduction rate, symptom improvement, quality-of-life outcomes) of MWA alone versus MWA combined with chemical ablation. This study aims to clarify the clinical value of the combined approach and provide high-quality, evidence-based data to guide the optimal selection of minimally invasive treatment strategies for uterine fibroids.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • A definitive diagnosis of uterine fibroids confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography, with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification 0-6;
  • At least one of the following symptoms: menorrhagia, secondary anemia, abdominal/pelvic pain, or compression symptoms;
  • Absence of perimenopausal signs;
  • A safe transabdominal puncture route accessible under imaging guidance.

Exclusion criteria

  • Suspicion of malignancy on ultrasound or MRI that cannot be ruled out (e.g., uterine sarcoma; uterine fibroids coexisting with cervical, endometrial, or ovarian cancer; or other gynecological malignancies);
  • Uterine fibroids with coexisting adenomyosis;
  • Menstrual, gestational, or lactational period;
  • Uterine fibroids classified as FIGO type 7;
  • Known allergy to alcohol, lauromacrogol, or related sclerosing agents;
  • Absence of a safe percutaneous puncture route (e.g., lesion adherent to critical structures - bowel, bladder, or major vessels - that cannot be safely separated);
  • Uncontrolled acute pelvic inflammatory disease;
  • Significant hepatic, renal, or other major organ dysfunction;
  • Severe coagulopathy, defined as platelet count <50 × 10⁹/L, prothrombin time >25 s, or prothrombin activity <40%;
  • History of other malignancies;
  • Participation in another clinical trial within 1 month prior to informed consent;
  • Any other condition deemed by the investigator to render the subject unsuitable for participation in this trial.

Treatment and study plan

Microwave ablation combined with chemical ablation

Procedure

Microwave ablation combined with lauromacrogol of Uterine Fibroids

Microwave ablation

Procedure

Microwave ablation of Uterine Fibroids

Primary outcomes

  1. ablation rate of uterine fibroids

    Time frame: 4 to 6 hours after the operation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Volume reduction rate

    Time frame: 12 months after the operation

  2. Complications

    Time frame: 12 months after the operation

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Lei Liang

CONTACT

[email protected]

010-59971599

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Peking University Aerospace Center Hospital

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 10, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.