Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
NCT Number: NCT01547598
Safety and Efficacy of LUMIGAN® RC Versus DuoTrav® in Patients Who Require Further Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Reduction
This non-inferiority study will assess safety and efficacy of LUMIGAN® RC (bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.01%) versus DuoTrav® (travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% combination ophthalmic solution) in patients previously on Travatan® Z (travoprost ophthalmic solution 0.004%) monotherapy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary location
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
- Best corrected visual acuity of 20/100 or better in both eyes
Exclusion criteria
- Ocular surgery within 3 months, or anticipated ocular surgery within 12 weeks
- Previous treatment with LUMIGAN® RC or DuoTrav®
- History of LASIK, LASEK, RK or PRK in the study eye(s)
- Active ocular inflammation
Treatment and study plan
travoprost ophthalmic solution 0.004%
DrugTravatan® Z (travoprost ophthalmic solution 0.004%) administered as 1 drop in the affected eye(s) once a day for 4 weeks.
Other names: Travatan® Z
travoprost 0.004% / timolol 0.5% combination ophthalmic solution
DrugDuoTrav® (travoprost 0.004% / timolol 0.5% combination ophthalmic solution) administered as 1 drop in the affected eye(s) once daily in the morning for 12 weeks.
Other names: DuoTrav®
Bimatoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.01%
DrugLUMIGAN® RC (bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.01%) administered as 1 drop in the affected eye(s) once daily in the evening for 12 weeks.
Other names: LUMIGAN® RC
Primary outcomes
-
Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Time frame: Week 12
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. The mean diurnal IOP was the average of the IOP values of the study eye (worse eye) at Week 12 measured at 8 AM, 12 Noon and 4 PM. For each study eye, IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the average of 3 measurements.
Secondary outcomes
-
Change From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP of the study eye (worse eye) was measured at 8 AM, 12 Noon and 4 PM at Week 12. For each eye, IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the average of 3 measurements. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
-
Percentage of Participants With ≥15% Reduction in Mean Diurnal IOP From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure in the eye. The mean diurnal IOP was the average of the IOP values of the study eye (worse eye) measured at 8 AM, 12 Noon and 4 PM. For each eye, IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the average of 3 measurements.
-
Percentage of Participants With Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 18 mmHg
Time frame: Week 12
IOP is a measure of the fluid pressure in the eye. The mean diurnal IOP was the average of the IOP values of the study eye (worse eye) at Week 12 measured at 8 AM, 12 Noon and 4 PM. For each eye, IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the average of 3 measurements.
-
Change From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 6
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6
IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP of the study eye (worse eye) was measured at 8 AM, 12 Noon and 4 PM at Week 6. For each eye, IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the average of 3 measurements. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Industry
Registry information
Important dates
- Study start
- 2011
- Primary completion
- 2013
- Study completion
- 2013
- First posted
- Mar 8, 2012
- Registry last updated
- Aug 15, 2014
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
To Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Perrigo's Product to an FDA Approved Product for the Treatment of Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension in Both Eyes
NCT04944290
Eye Diseases, Glaucoma
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsClinical Study Comparing Two Models of a Travoprost Intraocular Implant
NCT03868124
Eye Diseases, Glaucoma
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
View Trial DetailsRandomized Study Comparing Two Models of a Travoprost Intraocular Implant to Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.5%
NCT03519386
Eye Diseases, Glaucoma
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
View Trial DetailsDorzolamide+Timolol Multidose Preservative-free vs Dorzolamida+Timolol BAK Preserved Efficacy and Safety
NCT05857267
Eye Diseases, Glaucoma
Olivos, Buenos Aires, Argentina
View Trial Details