LAG525
DrugLAG525 was administered via intravenous (i.v.) infusion
NCT Number: NCT02460224
This study was to characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and anti-tumor activity of LAG525 as a single agent and in combination with PDR001 to adult patients with solid tumors. The study consists of a dose escalation (phase 1) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for LAG525 as a single agent and in combination with PDR001, and a dose expansion (phase 2) which characterized treatment of LAG525 in combination with PDR001 at the MTD or RP2D.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Novartis Investigative Site, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
This was a Phase 1/2, multi-center, open-label study comprising a Phase 1 dose escalation part followed by a Phase 2 dose expansion part.
During the Phase 1 dose escalation part patients with any advanced solid tumor received the study treatment until the MTD was reached or a lower RP2D was established. The study had the following 3 dose escalation parts: 1) Single-agent LAG525; 2) Single-agent LAG525 in Japanese patients; 3) Combination of LAG525 with PDR001.
Once the RP2D or MTD had been determined in the escalation parts, additional patients were to be enrolled in the Phase 2 expansion parts in order to assess the preliminary anti-tumor activity. Phase 2 expansion cohorts testing single-agent LAG525 were not opened for enrollment based on emerging data including but not limited to preliminary anti-tumor activity. Phase 2 expansion cohorts for the combination of LAG525 with PDR001 were opened and 5 tumor types were assessed: 1) Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); 2) Melanoma; 3) Renal cell cancer (RCC); 4) Mesothelioma; 5) Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The efficacy and safety of the combination of LAG525 with PDR001 in these tumor types was assessed in both the PD-1/PD-L1 pre-treated and naïve settings.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Phase I part:
Phase II part:
Exclusion criteria
LAG525 was administered via intravenous (i.v.) infusion
PDR001 was administered via i.v. infusion
Time frame: 15 days for single-agent LAG525 arms and 30 days for the combination LAG525 + PDR001 arms
A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as an adverse event or abnormal laboratory value of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3 assessed as having a suspected relationship to study drug, and unrelated to disease, disease progression, inter-current illness, or concomitant medications that occurs within the first cycle of treatment with single-agent LAG525 or within the first two cycles of treatment with the combination of LAG525 and PDR001. Other clinically significant toxicities may be considered to be DLTs, even if not CTCAE grade 3 or higher.
Time frame: From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to 2.6 years
Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment and the assessment criteria was Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). ORR per RECIST 1.1 is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR).
For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
ORR is reported by tumor type.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment until last dose of study treatment plus 30 days post treatment, assessed up to 4.5 years.
Number of participants with AEs and SAEs, including changes from baseline in vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory results qualifying and reported as AEs. The number of participants in each category (Rest of the World (ROW) patients, Japanese patients) with AEs and SAEs are reported in this record.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment until last dose of study treatment plus 30 days post treatment, assessed up to 2.7 years.
Number of participants with AEs and SAEs, including changes from baseline in vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory results qualifying and reported as AEs. The number of participants with AEs and SAEs is reported for each tumor type.
Time frame: From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to 4.4 years.
Number of participants with at least one dose reduction of LAG525, at least one dose interruption of LAG525, at least one dose reduction of PDR001 and at least one dose interruption of PDR001.
Japanese patients were not treated with PDR001 and therefore the dose reductions and dose interruptions of this study drug are not applicable.
Time frame: From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to 2.6 years.
Number of participants with at least one dose reduction of LAG525, at least one dose interruption of LAG525, at least one dose reduction of PDR001 and at least one dose interruption of PDR001.
The number of participants with dose reductions and dose interruptions of both study drugs is reported for each tumor type.
Time frame: From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to 4.4 years.
Relative dose intensity of each study drug is calculated with the following formula: 100 x actual dose intensity (mg/day)/planned dose intensity (mg/day).
Japanese patients were not treated with PDR001 and therefore the RDI of this study drug is not applicable.
Time frame: From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to 2.6 years.
Relative dose intensity of each study drug is calculated with the following formula: 100 x actual dose intensity (mg/day)/planned dose intensity (mg/day).
The RDI of both study drugs is reported for each tumor type.
Time frame: pre-infusion, 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours post-infusion, and 504 hours (Q3W regimens only) and 672 hours (Q4W regimens only) post infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of one cycle was 14 days (Q2W), 21 days (Q3W) and 28 days (Q4W).
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on LAG525 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed serum concentration following a dose.
Time frame: pre-infusion, 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours post-infusion, and 504 hours (Q3W regimens only) and 672 hours (Q4W regimens only) post infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of one cycle was 21 days (Q3W) and 28 days (Q4W).
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on LAG525 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed serum concentration following a dose.
Time frame: pre-infusion, 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours post-infusion, and 504 hours (Q3W regimens only) and 672 hours (Q4W regimens only) post infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of one cycle was 14 days (Q2W), 21 days (Q3W) and 28 days (Q4W).
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on LAG525 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) serum concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.
Time frame: pre-infusion, 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours post-infusion, and 504 hours (Q3W regimens only) and 672 hours (Q4W regimens only) post infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of one cycle was 21 days (Q3W) and 28 days (Q4W).
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on LAG525 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) serum concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.
Time frame: pre-infusion, 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours post-infusion, and 504 hours (Q3W regimens only) and 672 hours (Q4W regimens only) post infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of one cycle was 14 days (Q2W), 21 days (Q3W) and 28 days (Q4W).
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on LAG525 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC calculation.
Time frame: pre-infusion, 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours post-infusion, and 504 hours (Q3W regimens only) and 672 hours (Q4W regimens only) post infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of one cycle was 21 days (Q3W) and 28 days (Q4W).
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on LAG525 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC calculation.
Time frame: pre-infusion, 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours post-infusion, and 504 hours (Q3W regimens only) and 672 hours (Q4W regimens only) post infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of one cycle was 14 days (Q2W), 21 days (Q3W) and 28 days (Q4W).
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on LAG525 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Elimination half-life (T1/2) values were calculated as 0.693/terminal elimination rate constant.
Time frame: pre-infusion, 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours post-infusion, and 504 hours (Q3W regimens only) and 672 hours (Q4W regimens only) post infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of one cycle was 21 days (Q3W) and 28 days (Q4W).
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on LAG525 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Elimination half-life (T1/2) values were calculated as 0.693/terminal elimination rate constant.
Time frame: pre-infusion, 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours post-infusion, and 504 hours (Q3W regimens only) and 672 hours (Q4W regimens only) post infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of one cycle was 14 days (Q2W), 21 days (Q3W) and 28 days (Q4W).
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed serum concentration following a dose.
Japanese patients were not treated with PDR001 and therefore the PK parameters of this study drug are not applicable.
Time frame: pre-infusion, 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours post-infusion, and 504 hours (Q3W regimens only) and 672 hours (Q4W regimens only) post infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of one cycle was 21 days (Q3W) and 28 days (Q4W).
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed serum concentration following a dose.
Time frame: pre-infusion, 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours post-infusion, and 504 hours (Q3W regimens only) and 672 hours (Q4W regimens only) post infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of one cycle was 14 days (Q2W), 21 days (Q3W) and 28 days (Q4W).
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) serum concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.
Japanese patients were not treated with PDR001 and therefore the PK parameters of this study drug are not applicable.
Time frame: pre-infusion, 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours post-infusion, and 504 hours (Q3W regimens only) and 672 hours (Q4W regimens only) post infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of one cycle was 21 days (Q3W) and 28 days (Q4W).
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) serum concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.
Time frame: pre-infusion, 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours post-infusion, and 504 hours (Q3W regimens only) and 672 hours (Q4W regimens only) post infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of one cycle was 14 days (Q2W), 21 days (Q3W) and 28 days (Q4W).
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC calculation.
Japanese patients were not treated with PDR001 and therefore the PK parameters of this study drug are not applicable.
Time frame: pre-infusion, 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours post-infusion, and 504 hours (Q3W regimens only) and 672 hours (Q4W regimens only) post infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of one cycle was 21 days (Q3W) and 28 days (Q4W).
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC calculation.
Time frame: pre-infusion, 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours post-infusion, and 504 hours (Q3W regimens only) and 672 hours (Q4W regimens only) post infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of one cycle was 14 days (Q2W), 21 days (Q3W) and 28 days (Q4W).
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Elimination half-life (T1/2) values were calculated as 0.693/terminal elimination rate constant.
Japanese patients were not treated with PDR001 and therefore the PK parameters of this study drug are not applicable.
Time frame: pre-infusion, 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours post-infusion, and 504 hours (Q3W regimens only) and 672 hours (Q4W regimens only) post infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of one cycle was 21 days (Q3W) and 28 days (Q4W).
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Elimination half-life (T1/2) values were calculated as 0.693/terminal elimination rate constant.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1) and post-baseline (assessed throughout the treatment up to maximum 4.4 years).
Validated immunoassays were used for screening and confirmation of the presence of anti-LAG525 antibodies (ADA, anti-drug antibodies) in serum. Number of participants with ADA in each category is reported in this record.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1) and post-baseline (assessed throughout the treatment up to maximum 2.6 years).
Validated immunoassays were used for screening and confirmation of the presence of anti-LAG525 antibodies (ADA, anti-drug antibodies) in serum. Number of participants with ADA in each category is reported in this record.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1) and post-baseline (assessed throughout the treatment up to maximum 4.4 years).
Validated immunoassays were used for screening and confirmation of the presence of anti-PDR001 antibodies (ADA, anti-drug antibodies) in serum. Number of participants with ADA in each category is reported in this record.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1) and post-baseline (assessed throughout the treatment up to maximum 2.6 years).
Validated immunoassays were used for screening and confirmation of the presence of anti-PDR001 antibodies (ADA, anti-drug antibodies) in serum. Number of participants with ADA in each category is reported in this record.
Time frame: From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to 4.4 years
Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment and the assessment criteria was Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). ORR per RECIST 1.1 is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR).
For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
ORR is reported for ROW and Japanese patients.
Time frame: From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to 4.4 years
TTumor response was based on local investigator assessment and the assessment criteria was immune-related Response Criteria (irRC). ORR per irRC is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of immune related Complete Response (irCR) or immune related Partial Response (irPR).
For irRC, irCR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions and non-target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; irPR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions including new target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
ORR is reported for ROW and Japanese patients.
Time frame: From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to 2.6 years
Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment and the assessment criteria was immune-related Response Criteria (irRC). ORR per irRC is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of immune related Complete Response (irCR) or immune related Partial Response (irPR).
For irRC, irCR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions and non-target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; irPR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions including new target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
ORR is reported by tumor type.
Time frame: From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to 4.4 years
Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment and the assessment criteria was Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). DCR per RECIST 1.1 is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD).
For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD= Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progression.
DCR is reported for ROW and Japanese patients.
Time frame: From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to 4.4 years
Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment and the assessment criteria was immune-related Response Criteria (irRC). DCR per irRC is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of immune related Complete Response (irCR), immune related Partial Response (irPR) or immune related Stable Disease (irSD).
For irRC, irCR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions and non-target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; irPR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions including new target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD= Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for irPR or irCR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progression.
DCR is reported for ROW and Japanese patients.
Time frame: From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to 2.6 years
Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment and the assessment criteria was Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). DCR per RECIST 1.1 is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD).
For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD= Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progression.
DCR is reported by tumor type.
Time frame: From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to 2.6 years
Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment and the assessment criteria was immune-related Response Criteria (irRC). DCR per irRC is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of immune related Complete Response (irCR), immune related Partial Response (irPR) or immune related Stable Disease (irSD).
For irRC, irCR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions and non-target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; irPR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions including new target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD= Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for irPR or irCR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progression.
DCR is reported by tumor type.
Time frame: From first documented response (CR or PR) to first documented progression or death due to study indication, assessed up to 4.4 years
DOR only applies to subjects for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to study indication. If a patient not had an event, duration was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment and the assessment criteria was RECIST 1.1.
Time frame: From first documented response (irCR or irPR) to first documented progression or death due to study indication, assessed up to 4.4 years
DOR only applies to subjects for whom best overall response is immune related complete response (irCR) or immune related partial response (irPR). DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (irCR or irPR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to study indication. If a patient not had an event, duration was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment and the assessment criteria was irRC.
Time frame: From first documented response (CR or PR) to first documented progression or death due to study indication, assessed up to 2.6 years
DOR only applies to subjects for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to study indication. If a patient not had an event, duration was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment and the assessment criteria was RECIST 1.1.
DOR is reported by tumor type.
Time frame: From first documented response (irCR or irPR) to first documented progression or death due to study indication, assessed up to 2.6 years
DOR only applies to subjects for whom best overall response is immune related complete response (irCR) or immune related partial response (irPR). DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (irCR or irPR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to study indication. If a patient not had an event, duration was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment and the assessment criteria was irRC.
DOR is reported by tumor type.
Time frame: From start of treatment to first documented progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 4.4 years
PFS is the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not had an event, PFS is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment and the assessment criteria was RECIST 1.1.
PFS is reported for ROW and Japanese patients.
Time frame: From start of treatment to first documented progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 4.4 years
PFS is the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not had an event, PFS is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment and the assessment criteria was irRC.
PFS is reported for ROW and Japanese patients.
Time frame: From start of treatment to first documented progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 2.6 years
PFS is the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not had an event, PFS is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment and the assessment criteria was RECIST 1.1.
PFS is reported by tumor type.
Time frame: From start of treatment to first documented progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 2.6 years
PFS is the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not had an event, PFS is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment and the assessment criteria was irRC.
PFS is reported by tumor type.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Industry
A Phase I/II, Open Label, Multicenter Study of the Safety and Efficacy of LAG525 Single Agent and in Combination With PDR001 Administered to Patients With Advanced Malignancies
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03319459
Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Solid Tumors
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04157985
Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Solid Tumors
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02799095
Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Solid Tumors
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00514007
Adnexal Diseases, Advanced Solid Tumors
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial Details