KPI-121 1% Ophthalmic Suspension dosed BID
DrugOther names: Loteprednol etabonate
NCT Number: NCT02793817
The primary objective of the study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of KPI-121 1.0% ophthalmic suspension compared to placebo in subjects who have undergone cataract surgery.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Arizona Eye Center, Chandler, Arizona, United States
This is a Phase III, multicenter, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KPI-121 1.0% ophthalmic suspension versus placebo in subjects who require treatment of postoperative anterior ocular inflammation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Candidates for routine, uncomplicated cataract surgery
In Investigator's opinion, potential postoperative Snellen Distance VA by pinhole method of at least 20/200 in study eye.
Exclusion criteria
Other names: Loteprednol etabonate
Other names: Placebo
Time frame: Visit 5 (Day 8) maintained through Visit 6 (Day 15)
Number and percentage of subjects with complete resolution of AC cells in the surgical eye (study eye) at Day 8 maintained through Day 15, without receiving rescue medication prior to Day 15, for KPI-121 1% dosed twice daily (BID) compared with vehicle dosed BID.
Investigators were asked to grade AC cell based on the following scale wherein higher scores indicate a higher degree of cells present and a decrease across time indicates the condition is getting better.
Anterior Chamber Cells 0 = No cells seen
Time frame: Visit 5 (Day 8) maintained through Visit 6 (Day 15)
Number and percentage of subjects with complete resolution of ocular pain in the surgical eye (study eye) at Day 8 maintained through Day 15, without receiving rescue medication prior to Day 15, for KPI-121 1% dosed twice daily (BID) compared with vehicle dosed BID.
Subjects were given the Subject-Rated Ocular Pain Assessment to subjectively rate their pain at Days 1, 4, 8, 15, and the follow-up visit between Days 17 and 19. Higher scores were worse outcomes.
The following scoring scale was used for ocular pain:
0 = None
Time frame: Visit 4 (Day 4) maintained through Visit 6 (Day 15)
Number and percentage of subjects with complete resolution of ocular pain in the surgical eye (study eye) at Day 4 maintained through Day 15, without receiving rescue medication prior to Day 15, for KPI-121 1% dosed twice daily (BID) compared with vehicle dosed BID.
Subjects were given the Subject-Rated Ocular Pain Assessment to subjectively rate their pain at Days 1, 4, 8, 15, and the follow-up visit between Days 17 and 19. Higher scores were worse outcomes.
The following scoring scale was used for ocular pain:
0 = None
Time frame: Visit 4 (Day 4) maintained through Visit 6 (Day 15)
Number and percentage of subjects with complete resolution of AC flare in the surgical eye (study eye) at Day 4 maintained through Day 15, without receiving rescue medication prior to Day 15, for KPI-121 1% dosed twice daily (BID) compared with vehicle dosed BID.
Investigators were asked to grade AC flare based on the following scale wherein higher scores indicate a higher degree of flare present and a decrease across time indicates the condition is getting better.
Anterior Chamber Flare 0 = None
Time frame: Visit 1 (Baseline) and Visit 4 (Day 4)
The difference in mean changes from BL in AC cell count grade at Day 4 for KPI-121 1% dosed twice daily (BID) compared with vehicle dosed BID.
Investigators were asked to grade AC cell based on the following scale wherein higher scores indicate a higher degree of cells present and a decrease across time indicates the condition is getting better.
Anterior Chamber Cells 0 = No cells seen
Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Industry
A Phase 3, Double-Masked, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KPI-121 1.0% Ophthalmic Suspension in Subjects With Postsurgical Inflammation and Pain
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04246801
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Chandler, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04249076
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Sun City, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02163824
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Artesia, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02208297
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Bridgewater, New Jersey, United States
View Trial Details