Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00333840

Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib Versus Interferon-α Plus Cytarabine in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the side effects and anti-leukemic benefits of imatinib with those of interferon and Ara-C for patients who have chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase. Patients in this study will be randomized (1:1) to receive either interferon plus Ara-C or imatinib as initial treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Novartis Investigative Site, Adelaide, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must have signed consent for Amendment 5
  • Must have completed visit 62 of the core IRIS trial or be in follow-up
  • Must be on STI571 treatment
  • If on IFN treatment, must be willing to cross over to STI571 treatment

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who have discontinued from the study and are in follow-up
  • Patients who are on IFN treatment and do not want to cross over to STI571 treatment
  • Patients who have not consented to amendment 5
  • Patients who did not complete the amendment 5 protocol

Additional protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Treatment and study plan

Imatinib mesilate

Drug

imatinib supplied as 100 mg and 400 mg tablets or 100 mg capsules.

Other names: Glivec®, Gleevec®, STI571

interferon-alpha (INF-a)

Drug

interferon-alpha (IFN-a) subcutaneous (SC) injections escalated over 4 weeks to achieve a target dose of 5 MU/m^2/day.

Other names: Roferon®-A, Intron®-A

Cytarabine (ARA-C)

Drug

cytarabine 20 mg/m^2/day (max 40 mg) SC for 10 days every month.

Primary outcomes

  1. Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (All Randomized Participants)

    Time frame: 12,24,36,48,60,72,84,96,108,120,132 and 144 months

    Overall survival was defined as the time between date of randomization and death due to any cause. The time was censored at last examination date for patients who were still being treated and at date of last contact for patients who discontinued treatment. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants at each time point was calculated. This outcome was measured in all randomized patients, regardless of whether crossover occurred, i.e., events that occurred in patients, who had crossed over, were attributed following crossover to the original randomized treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Kaplan Meier Estimates of Event Free Survival (All Randomized Participants)

    Time frame: 12,24,36,48,60,72,84,96,108,120,132 and 144 months

    Event-free survival is defined as the time between randomization and the earliest of any of the following events on treatment:

    • progression to Accelerated Phase (AP) or Blast Crisis (BC)
    • loss of Complete Hematological Response (CHR)
    • loss of Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) confirmed
    • loss of Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) unconfirmed
    • increase in white blood cell count (WBC) if approved by the Study Management Committee (SMC)
    • death (due to any cause when reported as primary reason for discontinuation of treatment).

    Kaplan Meier estimates of the percentage of participants with Event Free Survival at the given time point was calculated. This outcome was measured in all randomized patients, regardless of whether crossover occurred, i.e., events that occurred in patients, who had crossed over, were attributed following crossover to the original randomized treatment.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Event Free Survival Events (All Randomized Participants)

    Time frame: 144 months

    Event-free survival is defined as the time between randomization and the earliest of any of the following events on treatment:

    • progression to Accelerated Phase (AP) or Blast Crisis (BC)
    • loss of Complete Hematological Response (CHR)
    • loss of Major Cytogenic Response (MCyR) confirmed
    • loss of Major Cytogenic Response (MCyR) unconfirmed
    • increase in white blood cell count (WBC) if approved by the Study Management Committee (SMC)
    • death (due to any cause when reported as primary reason for discontinuation of treatment).

    The percentage of participants with Event Free Survival events in each category was calculated. This outcome was measured in all randomized patients, regardless of whether crossover occurred, i.e., events that occurred in patients, who had crossed over, were attributed following crossover to the original randomized treatment.

  3. Kaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Progression to Accelerated Phase (AP) or Blast Crisis (BC) (All Randomized Participants)

    Time frame: 12,24,36,48,60,72,84,96,108,120,132 and 144 months

    Time to progression to AP/BC is defined as the time between randomization and either of the following events on treatment: death (due to CML when reported as primary reason for discontinuation of treatment) or progression to Accelerated Phase or Blast Crisis and is censored at last examination date for patients without event. No data after discontinuation of study treatment was included. The Kaplan Meier estimates of the percentage of participants with survival without progression to AP/BC at the given time point was calculated. This outcome was measured in all randomized patients, regardless of whether crossover occurred, i.e., events that occurred in patients, who had crossed over, were attributed following crossover to the original randomized treatment.

  4. Percentage of Participants With Best Cytogenetic Response (First-line Treatment)

    Time frame: 144 months

    Bone marrow aspirate was performed to evaluate cytogenetic results (percentage of Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) metaphases) and amount of blasts and promyelocytes in bone marrow to establish cytogenetic response.

    Major Cytogenetic Response= Complete Response or Partial Response. Complete Cytogenetic Response= 0 % of Ph+ metaphases (out of 20 metaphases). Partial Cytogenetic Response= > 0 and ≤ 35 % of Ph+ metaphases (out of 20 metaphases). The percentage of participants with cytogenetic response in each category was calculated.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Best Cytogenetic Response (Second-line Treatment)

    Time frame: 144 months

    Bone marrow aspirate was performed to evaluate cytogenetic results (percentage of Ph chromosome (Ph+) containing metaphases) and the amount of blasts and promyelocytes in bone marrow to establish cytogenetic response.

    Major Cytogenetic Response= Complete Response or Partial Response. Complete Cytogenetic Response= 0 % of Ph+ metaphases (out of 20 metaphases). Partial Cytogenetic Response= > 0 and ≤ 35 % Ph+ metaphases (out of 20 metaphases). The percentage of participants with cytogenetic response in each category was calculated.

  6. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety (First-line Treatment)

    Time frame: 144 months

    A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant

  7. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety (Second-line Treatment)

    Time frame: 144 months

    A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant

  8. Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (First-line Treatment)

    Time frame: 12,24,36,48,60,72,84,96,108,120,132 and 144 months

    Major Molecular Response was determined using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) laboratory test and was defined as BCR-ABL protein transcripts of ≤ 0.1% according to the international scale.

  9. Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (Second-line Treatment)

    Time frame: 12,24,36,48,60,72,84,96,108,120,132 and 144 months

    Major Molecular Response was determined using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) laboratory test and was defined as BCR-ABL protein transcripts of ≤ 0.1% according to the international scale.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase III Study of STI571 Versus Interferon-α (IFN-α) Combined With Cytarabine (Ara-C) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Previously Untreated Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP)

Important dates

Study start
2000
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jun 6, 2006
Registry last updated
Oct 14, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.