Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02174276

Safety and Efficacy of GS-4774 in Combination With Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) for the Treatment of Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) and Who Are Currently Not on Treatment

The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of GS-4774 in adults with CHB and who are currently not on treatment. Participants will be randomized to receive TDF alone or GS-4774 plus TDF for 20 weeks. After Week 20, GS-4774 will be discontinued. All participants will continue on TDF and will be followed for an additional 28 weeks. Following completion of the 48 week study period, all participants will be eligible for a treatment extension for 96 weeks.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Chronic Hepatitis B Blood-Borne Infections Chronic Disease Communicable Diseases DNA Virus Infections Digestive System Diseases Disease Attributes Hepadnaviridae Infections Hepatitis Hepatitis B Hepatitis B, Chronic Hepatitis, Chronic Hepatitis, Viral, Human Infections Liver Diseases Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Virus Diseases

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Gordon & Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must have the ability to understand and sign a written informed consent form, which must be obtained prior to initiation of study
  • Documented evidence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, for example, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive for more than 6 months
  • Screening HBV DNA ≥ 2000 IU/mL
  • A negative serum pregnancy test is required for females (unless surgically sterile or > 2 years post-menopausal)

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cirrhosis
  • Inadequate liver function
  • Co-infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV), HIV or hepatitis D virus (HDV)
  • Received antiviral treatment for HBV within 3 months of screening
  • Evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (eg, as evidenced by recent imaging)
  • Significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, or neurological disease
  • Women who are pregnant or may wish to become pregnant during the course of the study
  • Received solid organ or bone marrow transplant
  • Received prolonged therapy with immunomodulators (eg, corticosteroids) or biologics (eg, monoclonal antibody, interferon) within 3 months of screening
  • Use of investigational agents within 3 months of screening
  • Current alcohol or substance abuse judged by the investigator to potentially interfere with individual's compliance
  • Receipt of immunoglobulin or other blood products within 3 months prior to enrollment
  • History of demyelinating disease (Guillain-Barre), Bell's Palsy, Crohn's disease, Ulcerative colitis, or autoimmune disease
  • Documented history of yeast allergy
  • Known hypersensitivity to study drugs, metabolites or formulation excipients
  • Malignancy within 5 years prior to screening, with the exception of specific cancers that are cured by surgical resection (basal cell skin cancer, etc). Individuals under evaluation for possible malignancy are not eligible

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

Drug

TDF 300 mg tablet administered orally once daily

Other names: TDF, Viread®

GS-4774

Biological

GS-4774 subcutaneous injection administered every 4 weeks for a total of 6 doses

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Serum HBsAg From Baseline to Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

    The change from baseline to Week 24 in HBsAg was analyzed using a mixed effect model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model included treatment groups, ALT levels (> ULN or ≤ ULN) at baseline, HBeAg status (positive or negative) at baseline, HBsAg level at baseline, visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and visit as a repeated measurement. Estimated least square means of treatment effects are presented with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in HBsAg From Baseline to Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    The change from baseline to Week 12 in HBsAg was analyzed using a MMRM. The model included treatment groups, ALT levels (> ULN or ≤ ULN) at baseline, HBeAg status (positive or negative) at baseline, HBsAg level at baseline, visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and visit as a repeated measurement. Estimated least square means of treatment effects are presented with the 95% CIs.

  2. Mean Change in HBsAg From Baseline to Week 48

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

    The change from baseline to Week 48 in HBsAg was analyzed using a MMRM. The model included treatment groups, ALT levels (> ULN or ≤ ULN) at baseline, HBeAg status (positive or negative) at baseline, HBsAg level at baseline, visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and visit as a repeated measurement. Estimated least square means of treatment effects are presented with the 95% CIs.

  3. Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss at Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

    HBsAg loss was defined as qualitative HBsAg test changing from positive at baseline to negative at any postbaseline visit within the targeted time window.

  4. Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss at Week 48

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

    HBsAg loss was defined as qualitative HBsAg test changing from positive at baseline to negative at any postbaseline visit within the targeted time window.

  5. Composite Endpoint Measuring the Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and HBsAg Seroconversion at Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

    HBsAg loss was defined as qualitative HBsAg test changing from positive at baseline to negative at any postbaseline visit within the targeted time window. HBsAg loss and seroconversion was defined as qualitative HBsAb result changing from negative at baseline to positive at any postbaseline visit and the participant must have achieved HBsAg loss within the targeted time window.

  6. Composite Endpoint Measuring the Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and HBsAg Seroconversion at Week 48

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

    HBsAg loss was defined as qualitative HBsAg test changing from positive at baseline to negative at any postbaseline visit within the targeted time window. HBsAg loss and seroconversion was defined as qualitative HBsAb result changing from negative at baseline to positive at any postbaseline visit and the participant must have achieved HBsAg loss within the targeted time window.

  7. Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 0.5 Log10 IU/mL or a ≥ 1.0 Log10 IU/mL Decline in HBsAg at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    HBsAg with a ≥ 0.5 or ≥ 1.0 log10 IU/mL decline was defined as ≥ 0.5 or ≥ 1.0 decline from baseline in log10 IU/mL serum HBsAg at any postbaseline visit within the targeted time window.

  8. Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 0.5 Log10 IU/mL or a ≥ 1.0 Log10 IU/mL Decline in HBsAg at Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

    HBsAg with a ≥ 0.5 or ≥ 1.0 log10 IU/mL decline was defined as ≥ 0.5 or ≥ 1.0 decline from baseline in log10 IU/mL serum HBsAg at any postbaseline visit within the targeted time window.

  9. Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 0.5 Log10 IU/mL or a ≥ 1.0 Log10 IU/mL Decline in HBsAg at Week 48

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

    HBsAg with a ≥ 0.5 or ≥ 1.0 log10 IU/mL decline was defined as ≥ 0.5 or ≥ 1.0 decline from baseline in log10 IU/mL serum HBsAg at any postbaseline visit within the targeted time window.

  10. Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss at Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

    HBeAg loss was defined as qualitative HBeAg test changing from positive at baseline to negative at any postbaseline visit within the targeted time window.

  11. Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss at Week 48

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

    HBeAg loss was defined as qualitative HBeAg test changing from positive at baseline to negative at any postbaseline visit within the targeted time window.

  12. Composite Endpoint Measuring the Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss and HBeAg Seroconversion at Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

    HBeAg loss was defined as qualitative HBeAg test changing from positive at baseline to negative at any postbaseline visit within the targeted time window. HBeAg loss and seroconversion was defined as qualitative HBeAb result changing from negative at baseline to positive at any postbaseline visit and the participant must have achieved HBeAg loss within the targeted time window.

  13. Composite Endpoint Measuring the Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss and HBeAg Seroconversion at Week 48

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

    HBeAg loss was defined as qualitative HBeAg test changing from positive at baseline to negative at any postbaseline visit within the targeted time window. HBeAg loss and seroconversion was defined as qualitative HBeAb result changing from negative at baseline to positive at any postbaseline visit and the participant must have achieved HBeAg loss within the targeted time window.

  14. Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ) at Week 24

    Time frame: Week 24

    The LLOQ was defined as 20 IU/mL.

  15. Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < LLOQ at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48

    The LLOQ was defined as 20 IU/mL.

  16. Percentage of Participants Experiencing Virologic Breakthrough at Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

    Virologic breakthrough was defined as HBV DNA ≥ 69 IU/mL after having been < 69 IU/mL, or having had ≥ 1.0 log10 increase in HBV DNA from nadir. Two consecutive visits that met the definition were required for a participant to be classified as having had virologic breakthrough.

  17. Percentage of Participants Experiencing Virologic Breakthrough at Week 48

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

    Virologic breakthrough was defined as HBV DNA ≥ 69 IU/mL after having been < 69 IU/mL, or a ≥ 1.0 log10 increase in HBV DNA from nadir. Two consecutive visits that met the definition were required for a participant to be classified as having had virologic breakthrough.

  18. Number of Participants With Drug-Resistance Mutations at Week 48 or at the Last Visit Available

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

    Resistance surveillance analysis was conducted at Week 48 or Early Discontinuation (with at least 24 weeks of exposure to TDF) for any participants who met inclusion criteria (HBV DNA ≥ 69 IU/mL). Drug-resistant mutation status was assessed using HBV polymerase/ reverse transcriptase (pol/RT) population sequencing.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Gilead Sciences

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of GS-4774 in Combination With Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) for the Treatment of Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B and Who Are Currently Not on Treatment

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jun 25, 2014
Registry last updated
Jun 4, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.