Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04884763

Safety and Efficacy of Erenumab-aooe in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorder

The purpose of this proof of concept study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the off-label use of Aimovig® (EREN) in reducing Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD) pain compared to placebo.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–59 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Indiana University School of Dentistry, Oral Health Research Institute

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

About this study

This will be a 24-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel group proof-of-concept study with two arms (active and placebo). The plan is to enroll 30 subjects. There will be a four-week screening period to identify subjects that meet the diagnostic criteria (DC/TMD) for "myalgia", recommended by the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. The Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Symptom Questionnaire and DC/TMD Examination Form will be used during Screening and Baseline visits to confirm the TMD diagnosis and determine whether subjects meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Subjects will attend a Screening visit followed by Baseline visit to randomize eligible subjects to active (EREN) or placebo (EREN-P). During the Baseline visit and Wks 4, 8, 12, and 16, subjects will receive treatment with either 140 mg of EREN or Placebo administered by subcutaneous injection. At Baseline and Wks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 subjects will be instructed to complete the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI); PEG (Pain, Enjoyment, General Activity) Scale; pain mediation assessment; Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) (except for Baseline visit); Jaw Function Limitation Scale (JFLS); Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4); and Somatic Symptom Scale (SSS-8). These visits will include review of continuance criteria and adverse event collection.

At the Screening and Baseline visits the subjects will be instructed on how to use the PEG Scale and pain use assessment app, which will be downloaded on their smartphone, to provide a daily assessment of their pain intensity and interference with enjoyment and general activity (PEG) and their daily used of pain medications. Subjects who do not own a smartphone or are unwilling to use the app on a daily basis will only complete the PEG and pain medication assessment at the Baseline visit and all subsequent visits using the app onsite.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Subjects eligible for inclusion in the study must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Signed the informed consent;
  • Have pain-related TMD myalgia assessed by history and clinical examination as established by the DC/TMD;
  • Age 18 years and younger than 60 years;
  • Have a good knowledge of the English language;
  • Able to understand and comply with the study requirements;
  • Have had TMD myalgia for 6 months or longer; and
  • If taking pain medications, the dose regimen must be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects meeting any of the following criteria are not eligible for inclusion:

  • Lacking stable bilateral posterior occlusion;
  • Currently uses a complete maxillary or mandibular prosthetic denture;
  • Currently pregnant or plan to become pregnant;
  • Breastfeeding or plan to breastfeed;
  • Allergic to erenumab-aooe or any of the ingredients in Aimovig® (acetate, polysorbate 80, and sucrose);
  • Allergic to rubber or latex;
  • Currently undergoing TMD treatment elsewhere;
  • Currently undergoing orthodontic treatment;
  • Currently included in other experimental protocols within the last 30 days before enrollment;
  • Having 11 or more headaches during the past 4 weeks;
  • Having received massage, acupuncture or physical therapy treatment of the head, neck or shoulders during the previous 3 months;
  • History of unstable or acute severe pain from another pain condition;
  • History of traumatic brain injury;
  • History of surgical treatment or recommended surgical treatment for TMD;
  • History of ongoing, unresolved disability litigation;
  • History of drug abuse;
  • History of moderate to severe sleep apnea requiring CPAP or oral mandibular repositioning appliance;
  • Anything that would place the subjects at increased risk or preclude the individual's full compliance with or completion of the study (e.g., medical condition, laboratory finding, physical exam finding logistical complication); and
  • History of previously receiving erenumab-aooe or other anti-CGRP therapies, including anti-CGRP and anti-CGRP receptor monoclonal antibodies and small molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants).
  • History of chronic constipation and/or using medication associated with decreased gastrointestinal motility.
  • History of hypertension or risk factors for hypertension.

Treatment and study plan

Erenumab-aooe (EREN) 140 mg s.c. administered every four weeks for a total of five treatments

Drug

Erenumab-aooe (EREN) 140 mg s.c. administered at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 for a total of five treatments

Other names: Aimovig®

Placebo (EREN-P) s.c. administered every four weeks for a total of five treatments

Drug

Placebo (EREN-P) s.c. administered at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 for a total of five treatments

Other names: Placebo

Primary outcomes

  1. Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity at 20 Weeks

    Time frame: 20 weeks.

    Assessment of pain severity using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) 4-item pain severity scale at 20 weeks: 0 (Better) - 10 (Worse). Interim assessments were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks and post-treatment at 24 weeks (secondary outcome).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference at 20 Weeks

    Time frame: 20 weeks

    Assessment of pain interference using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) 7-item pain intensity scale at 20 weeks: 0 (Better) - 10 (Worse). Interim assessments were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks and post-treatment at 24 weeks (additional secondary outcome).

  2. Average Daily Reported Pain Scores at 20 Weeks

    Time frame: 20 weeks

    Assessment of pain using average of daily reported pain scores at 20 weeks; average of daily reported scores from days > week 16 and <= week 20. Pain scale: 0 (Better) - 10 (Worse). Interim assessments were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks and post-treatment at 24 weeks (additional secondary outcome).

  3. % of Days Taking Medication for Pain at 20 Weeks

    Time frame: 20 weeks

    Assessment of pain using the % of days taking medication for pain at 20 weeks; percentage of days calculated from days > week 16 and <= week 20.Interim assessments were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks and post-treatment at 24 weeks (additional secondary outcome).

  4. Pain Improvement Using the Patient Global Impression of Change in Pain at 20 Weeks

    Time frame: 20 weeks

    Assessment of pain improvement using the patient global impression of change in pain scale at 20 weeks: 1 (Better) - 7 (Worse). Interim assessments were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks and post-treatment at 24 weeks (additional secondary outcome).

  5. Jaw Function Limitation Scale (JFLS-8) at 20 Weeks

    Time frame: 20 weeks

    Jaw Function Limitation Scale (JFLS-8) at 20 weeks: 0 (Better) - 10 (Worse).Interim assessments were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks and post-treatment at 24 weeks (additional secondary outcome).

  6. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) at 20 Weeks

    Time frame: 20 weeks

    Depressive and Anxiety symptoms using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) at 20 weeks: 0 (Better) - 12 (Worse). Interim assessments were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks and post-treatment at 24 weeks (additional secondary outcome).

  7. Somatic Symptoms Scale (SSS-8) at 20 Weeks

    Time frame: 20 weeks

    Assessment of somatic symptoms using the Somatic Symptoms Scale (SSS-8) at 20 weeks: 0 (Better) - 32 (Worse). Interim assessments were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks and post-treatment at 24 weeks (additional secondary outcome).

  8. Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity at 24 Weeks

    Time frame: 24 weeks.

    Assessment of pain severity using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) 4-item pain severity scale at 24 weeks: 0 (Better) - 10 (Worse). Interim assessments were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks and end of treatment at 20 weeks (primary outcome).

  9. Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference at 24 Weeks

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Assessment of pain interference using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) 7-item pain intensity scale at 24 weeks: 0 (Better) - 10 (Worse). Interim assessments were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks and end of treatment at 20 weeks (additional secondary outcome).

  10. Average Daily Reported Pain Scores at 24 Weeks

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Assessment of pain using average of daily reported pain scores at 24 weeks; average of daily reported scores from days > week 20 and <= week 24. Pain scale: 0 (Better) - 10 (Worse). Interim assessments were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks and end of treatment at 20 weeks (additional secondary outcome).

  11. % of Days Taking Medication for Pain at 24 Weeks

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Assessment of pain using the % of days taking medication for pain at 24 weeks; percentage of days calculated from days > week 20 and <= week 24. Interim assessments were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks and end of treatment at 20 weeks (additional secondary outcome).

  12. Pain Improvement Using the Patient Global Impression of Change in Pain at 24 Weeks

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Assessment of pain improvement using the patient global impression of change in pain scale at 24 weeks: 1 (Better) - 7 (Worse). Interim assessments were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks and end of treatment at 20 weeks (additional secondary outcome).

  13. Jaw Function Limitation Scale (JFLS-8) at 24 Weeks

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Jaw Function Limitation Scale (JFLS-8) at 24 weeks: 0 (Better) - 10 (Worse).Interim assessments were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks and end of treatment at 20 weeks (additional secondary outcome).

  14. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) at 24 Weeks

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Depressive and Anxiety symptoms using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) at 24 weeks: 0 (Better) - 12 (Worse). Interim assessments were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks and end of treatment at 20 weeks (additional secondary outcome).

  15. Somatic Symptoms Scale (SSS-8) at 24 Weeks

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Assessment of somatic symptoms using the Somatic Symptoms Scale (SSS-8) at 24 weeks: 0 (Better) - 32 (Worse). Interim assessments were performed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks and end of treatment at 20 weeks (additional secondary outcome).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Indiana University

Other

Collaborators

  • Amgen

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Single Center Phase 2 Pilot Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Off-label Subcutaneous Administration of Erenumab-aooe in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorder

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
May 13, 2021
Registry last updated
Aug 19, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.