Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04665284

Safety And Efficacy Of Empagliflozin In Pakistani Muslim Population With Type Ii Diabetes Mellitus

To compare the safety and efficacy of empagliflozin versus other treatments in Pakistani Muslim population with type II diabetes mellitus.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Balochistan Medical Center, Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Diabetes is the one of the most common non-communicable diseases affecting 425 million adults worldwide. This figure is expected to rise to 629 million by the year 2045.1 90% of the diabetic population has type 2 diabetes. 2 As of 2018, more than 500 million individuals are residing with type 2 diabetes mellitus globally. 3 In Pakistan, the situation is similarly alarming. According to a recent survey, 16.98% of the Pakistani population has diabetes.4 The primary target of therapy in diabetes mellitus is optimum blood glucose control. In case of type 2 diabetes, this is achieved by a combination of oral hypoglycemic agents and injectable drugs with insulin as a last resort.

A number of oral agents targeting various sites of action are available. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are newer class of drugs that have been introduced. They have a unique mechanism of action. By acting at the sodium glucose co-transporter, they block the reabsorption of glucose leading to an increase in urinary glucose excretion and lowering of plasma glucose.5 This action is completely independent of the beta cell function. There are several theoretical advantages to this approach. In addition to lowering blood glucose, the urinary glucose excretion results in loss of calories and weight reduction and the associated osmotic diuretic effect can aid in lowering blood pressures.6,7 Numerous studies have demonstrated a favorable risk benefit ratio of empagliflozin as monotherapy8 as well as add-on therapy to other hypoglycemic agents.9,10,11,12 They also have additional cardiovascular benefits with several studies documenting a reduction in mortality.13,14 Moreover, the sodium glucose co-transporters also demonstrated a reduction in the onset and worsening of nephropathy and preservation of renal function.15 This effect is not restricted to empagliflozin alone, as other drugs in the class have also demonstrated this benefit.16 Empagliflozin with its novel mechanism of action has its own set of side effects. Increased urinary glucose losses lead to a higher proportion of urinary tract infections and genital tract infections. This has been evidenced in various studies.17 The osmotic diuresis that benefits in lowering blood pressures at one end, also predisposes the patients to volume depletion.Empagliflozin, one of the three drugs from this class, approved by the FDA for treatment of type 2 diabetes. According to the recent ADA and the EASD guidelines, they have become an essential component of the algorithm recommended for managing type 2 diabetes.18 The recently published consensus statement by the South Asian Federation of Endocrine Societies has incorporated sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes as monotherapy in patients who are intolerant to or have any contraindication to metformin therapy. Additionally, drugs belonging to this class are also recommended as combination therapy with other oral hypoglycemic agents as well as insulin.19 Empagliflozin, however, has not been studied in the Pakistani population as yet. The main aim of this study is to establish the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in optimum control of blood sugar in type 2 diabetes. This is the first study of its kind being performed in the Pakistani population.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pakistani muslim male / female, type 2 diabetic patient having age from 18 years to 75 years
  • Patient who give informed consent voluntarily
  • BMI ≤45 kg/m2
  • Glycosylated hemoglobin of 7 - ≤10%

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who are on empagliflozin treatment
  • Indication of liver disease, defined by serum levels of either alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase above 3 times upper limit to normal
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 mL /min /1.73m2
  • History of recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) and/or past 3 months' history of UTI and its treatment
  • Patients with positive urine culture for UTI at the time of screening
  • Patients who have been admitted to the hospital in the past 3 months for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state
  • Patients with past 3 months' history of fungal infection and its treatment
  • History of blood dyscrasias or any disorders causing haemolysis or unstable red blood cell
  • History of benign prostate hyperplasia
  • Any acute coronary syndrome, stroke and/or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the previous 3 months
  • Any contraindication for patients to Biguanides, Sulfonylureas, DPP-IV inhibitors, SGLT-2 Inhibitors
  • Treatment with anti-obesity drugs or any other treatment leading to unstable body weight
  • Patients with past 6 weeks treatment history with systemic steroids or thyroid hormones or any other uncontrolled endocrine disorder except T2DM
  • Pre-menopausal women who are nursing or pregnant or are of childbearing potential and not practicing an acceptable method of birth control
  • Any other clinical condition that would jeopardize patients safety while participating in this study

Treatment and study plan

Empagliflozin

Drug

Group A: Empagliflozin 10/25 mg once daily with or without antidiabetic drugs

Other names: Group A

Usual Care Group

Drug

Group B: usual care group but without Empagliflozin with adjustment of therapy as the standard of care

Other names: Group B

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants reported adverse events

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Number of participants reported adverse events such as Hypoglycemic events, Hypotension, Dehydration, Urinary tract infection, Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Fungal infection or any other

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frequency of participants achieved HbA1c level <7%

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Frequency of participants achieved HbA1c level <7%

  2. Frequency of participants achieved FBS level within normal range

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Frequency of participants achieved FBS level within normal range

Other outcomes

  1. Number of participants reduces weight during the therapy

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Number of participants reduces weight during the therapy or mean reduction in weight overtime

  2. Number of participants reduces BMI level as per WHO Asian classification during the therapy

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Number of participants reduces BMI or mean reduction in BMI overtime

  3. Number of participants reduces Waist circumference during the therapy

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Number of participants reduces Waist circumference or mean reduction in BMI overtime

  4. Number of participants changes systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure during the therapy

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Number of participants reduces systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure or mean reduction in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure overtime

  5. Number of participants changes LDL level and HDL Level during the therapy

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Number of participants reduces LDL level and HDL Level or mean reduction in LDL level and HDL Level overtime

  6. Mean score of diabetes mellitus quality of life

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    The instrument provides an overall scale score, as well as two subscale scores for 1) satisfaction with treatment, 2) adherence with Self Care Regimen. 15 Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale and are of two general formats.One format asks about the frequency of negative impact of diabetes itself or of the diabetes treatment and provides response options from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time). The second format asks about satisfaction with treatment and quality of life and is scored from 1 (very satisfied) to 5 (very dissatisfied). Higher scores on DQOL items and subscales are, therefore, negatively valenced, indicating problem frequency or dissatisfaction.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Getz Pharma

Industry

Registry information

Acronym: SAFE-PAK

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Dec 11, 2020
Registry last updated
Dec 11, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.