Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04121767

Safety and Efficacy of Edoxaban in Thoracoscopic Ablation

The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of edoxaban and warfarin for prevention of stroke during a 6-month follow up after total thoracoscopic ablation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Samsung Medical Center

Seoul, 135-710, South Korea

About this study

In Korea, 5% of patients older than 65 years and 10% of patients older than 80 have a history of atrial fibrillation (AF), which is often associated with sudden death and stroke. Medication and percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation are commonly used treatment modalities. Pharmacotherapy is primarily symptomatic treatment; moreover, the effect of conversion to a normal rhythm is minimal, and mainly aimed at stabilizing heart rate. Catheter ablation is associated with a high incidence of recurrence in chronic AF, and it is difficult to treat left atrial appendage, thereby preventing discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy post procedure. Thoracoscopic ablation is known to be a less invasive and more effective modality to treat patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. However, anticoagulation therapy is mandatory in the early postoperative period due to intracardiac thromboembolism associated with atrial stunning despite conversion to a sinus rhythm and resection of the left atrial appendage. Further investigation would be required to assess the efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants such as edoxaban compared to that of warfarin for stroke prevention during the early postoperative period (6 months) after a thoracoscopic procedure. The need to maintain a constant level of blood coagulation and the potential development of complications such as hemorrhages are drawbacks associated with the use of warfarin. While novel oral anticoagulants such as edoxaban do have a role in atrial fibrillation, data regarding their effectiveness and incidence of complications after arrhythmia surgery do not exist. In this study, we will compare warfarin and edoxaban with respect to safety and efficacy, after they are used for 6 months following thoracoscopic ablation in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 years or older (not exceed 80 years old).
  • Elective thoracoscopic ablation.
  • Presence of atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal, persistent, long-standing persistent).

Exclusion criteria

  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
  • History of pulmonary tuberculosis.
  • Other cardiac comorbidities including valvular disease, coronary artery disease.
  • Congenital heart anomalies except for atrial septal defect.
  • Known, clinically important anemia or thrombocytopenia.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Malignancy.
  • Intracardiac mass or thrombus
  • Life expectancy less than 1 year.

Treatment and study plan

Edoxaban

Drug

oral edoxaban 60mg once daily for 3 months

Other names: Savaysa

Warfarin

Drug

oral warfarin once daily for 3 months according to prothrombin time

Other names: Coumadin

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative stroke

    Time frame: 6 months

    Number of patients showing thromboembolic neurologic complication after thoracoscopic ablation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative bleeding

    Time frame: 6 months

    Number of patients showing bleeding events due to anticoagulation after thoracoscopic ablation

  2. Postoperative pericarditis

    Time frame: 6 months

    Number of patients showing pericarditis requiring readmission after thoracoscopic ablation

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Samsung Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Safety and Efficacy of Edoxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients Undergoing a Thoracoscopic Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Oct 10, 2019
Registry last updated
Aug 3, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.