Yongcheol Kim
Yongin, Gyeonggi-do, 16995, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT05776550
A Prospective Registry to assess the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Anaphylactic radial approach is now recognized as a basic technique in coronary artery procedures. The main advantage is increased stability due to the reduction of massive bleeding and increased patient comfort because it can move immediately after the procedure. The operator prefers access to the right radial artery because of the comfort of performing the procedure on the right side of the patient. However, the operator should frequently replace it with a left radial artery approach for various reasons, including 1) closure of the right radial artery, 2) difficulty accessing the coronary artery due to severe gambling of the radial artery, and 3) hemodialysis of the right radial artery.
As for prognosis, the left and right radial artery approaches are similar. However, the left radial artery approach is bound to experience anthropological discomfort in which the operator has to lean toward the patient. An easy solution is the approach from the anatomical left snuff box located on the back of the hand to the distal radial artery. Recently, the left snuffbox approach has been reported, and attempts are increasing in many countries. However, it is true that there is still a difference in diameter of the radial artery through the distant radial artery approach and concerns about percutaneous coronary intervention through this compared to the classical radial artery approach. Recent studies have published studies on the stability and effectiveness of distant radial artery approaches, but they are still small, and studies on specific subgroups are very scarce. Furthermore, data on the current status and performance in Korea so far is very scarce. Therefore, through this study, we would like to systematically collect and analyze data on the status and performance of the approach through the distant radial artery approach to find out the stability and effectiveness of various patient groups, treatment methods.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: through procedure completion, up to 24 hours
Success rate of examination and procedure
Time frame: through procedure completion, up to 24 hours
the success rate of the puncture
Time frame: through procedure completion, up to 24 hours
puncture time
Time frame: the first outpatient visit after discharge
complications of the puncture region
Yonsei University
Other
A Prospective Registry to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Access (SAFE-BOX)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07722884
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Efficacy
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07557966
Efficacy, Fluconazole
Tanta, El-Gharbia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07000669
Bilateral, Cataract Surgery
Tanta, El-Gharbia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04592640
Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy, Calcinosis
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
View Trial Details