Pumitamig
DrugIntravenous infusion
Other names: BNT327, BMS-986545, PM8002
NCT Number: NCT06712355
This is a Phase III, multisite, randomized, double-blinded study to investigate pumitamig (BNT327) combined with chemotherapy (etoposide/carboplatin) compared to atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy (etoposide/carboplatin) for the treatment of participants with previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
There are two stages in this study: Stage 1 will have two treatment arms and one control arm, and Stage 2 will have a treatment arm and a control arm. The control arms in Stages 1 and 2 are the same.
Each stage of the study consists of a screening period (up to 21 days), an induction period followed by a maintenance period (until confirmed disease progression, intolerable toxicity, participant withdrawal, study termination or up to 2 years [whichever occurs first]), and a follow-up (FU) period for all participants (2 safety FU visits and survival FU visits).
In Stage 1, eligible participants will be randomized (1:1:1) to the arms. In Stage 2, participants will then be randomized (1:1) to the arms. The randomization will be stratified based on the following factors:
Participants will be allowed to switch to cisplatin if carboplatin is not tolerated at the investigator's discretion.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria apply.
Intravenous infusion
Other names: BNT327, BMS-986545, PM8002
Intravenous infusion
Intravenous infusion and capsules
Intravenous infusion
Time frame: Up to approximately 46 months
OS defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.
Time frame: Up to approximately 46 months
PFS defined as the time from randomization to first objective tumor progression (progressive disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 [RECIST v1.1]), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: Up to approximately 46 months
ORR defined as the proportion of participants in whom a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (based on investigator's assessment per RECIST v1.1) is observed as best overall response with confirmation.
Time frame: Up to approximately 46 months
DOR defined as the time from onset of objective response (confirmed CR or PR based on investigator's assessment per RECIST v1.1) to first occurrence of objective tumor progression (progressive disease per RECIST v1.1) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: At 6, 12, and 18 months
Time frame: At 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment to the 90-Day Follow-up Visit
TEAEs graded according to (US) National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0
Time frame: From first to last dose of study treatment, i.e., up to 2 years
Time frame: Up to approximately 46 months
Global health status/QoL scale ranges in score from 0 to 100 with a high scale score representing a higher response level (e.g., high score for global health status/QoL is high QoL: high score for symptom scale/item is high symptomatology or problems).
Time frame: Up to approximately 46 months
Physical functioning scale ranges in score from 0 to 100 with a high scale score representing a higher response level (e.g., high score for functional scale is high/healthy level of functioning).
Time frame: Up to approximately 46 months
Multi-item coughing scale ranges in score from 0 to 100 with a high score representing a high level of symptomatology or problems.
Time frame: Up to approximately 46 months
Multi-item shortness of breath scale ranges in score from 0 to 100 with a high score representing a high level of symptomatology or problems.
Time frame: Up to approximately 46 months
Single item coughing up blood ranges in score from 0 to 100 with a high score representing a high level of symptomatology or problems.
Time frame: Up to approximately 46 months
The FACT-G - Item GP5 (Version 4) is a single-item summary measure of the overall impact of treatment toxicity, based upon its association with the number and degree of AEs in clinical studies, rated on a 5-point Likert scale ("not at all" to "very much") with a recall period of past 7 days. A high score represents high level of problems.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
BioNTech SE
Industry
A Phase III, Multisite, Double-blinded Randomized Trial of BNT327 in Combination With Chemotherapy (Etoposide/Carboplatin) Compared to Atezolizumab in Combination With Chemotherapy (Etoposide/Carboplatin) in Participants With First-line Extensive-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06217757
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05068232
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05092412
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05484583
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
View Trial Details