Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01297491

Safety and Efficacy of BKM120 in Patients With Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

The purpose of this two-stage phase II study is to assess the efficacy of BKM120, as measured by determining the progression free survival (PFS), in patients with pretreated metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) that exhibits PI3K pathway activation. BKM120 will be investigated in two groups of NSCLC patients according to the histology of the cancer: squamous and non-squamous.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Novartis Investigative Site, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically confirmed NSCLC with activated PI3K pathway
  • Progressive disease after prior systemic antineoplastic treatment(s) for advanced NSCLC
  • Archival or fresh tumor biopsy must be available for profiling
  • Measurable and/or non-measurable disease as per RECIST 1.1 criteria
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2
  • Adequate organ function as assessed by laboratory tests

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient has received previous treatment with PI3K inhibitors
  • Patient with squamous NSCLC has received more than one line of chemotherapy treatment for metastatic disease; patient with non-squamous NSCLC has received more than two lines of systemic antineoplastic treatment for metastatic disease
  • Uncontrolled or symptomatic CNS metastases
  • Concurrent use of any other approved or investigational antineoplastic agent
  • Radiotherapy ≤ 28 days prior to starting study drug
  • Major surgery within 28 days prior to starting study drug
  • History of clinically significant cardiac dysfunction, mood disorders, or poorly controlled diabetes mellitus
  • Current treatment with medication that has a known risk to prolong the QT interval or inducing Torsades de Pointes
  • Impairment of gastrointestinal (GI) function
  • Chronic treatment with steroids or another immunosuppressive agent.
  • Concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical condition
  • Currently receiving Warfarin or another coumarin derivative
  • Known history of HIV infection
  • Sensory neuropathy with functional impairment (CTC grade 2 neuropathy, regardless of causality)
  • Pregnancy, lactation, or breastfeeding
  • Woman of child-bearing potential

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Treatment and study plan

BKM120

Drug

Buparlisib was supplied as 10mg or 50mg capsules. It was administered on a continuous once daily dosing schedule at a dose of 100 mg. The patient was dosed on a flat scale of mg/day and not adjusted to body weight or body surface area.

Other names: Buparlisib

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate as Per Investigator Local Review Measured Using RECIST 1.1 of Patients at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    PFS rate was defined as the percentage of participants who were progression free at 12 weeks. Participants were considered as a "success" for PFS rate evaluated at 12 weeks if they presented an overall response at their 2nd post-baseline tumor assessment.The enrollment into the study in either histology group would stop for futility if a PFS rate <50% at 12 weeks was observed.

    No statistical analysis was planned for this primary outcome. The results of the primary objective was based on the data from the interim analysis that took place at the cut off dates: 10-Apr-2013 for non-squamous and 08-Jan-2014 for squamous group.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS) Using Kaplan-Meier Estimates

    Time frame: Every 8 weeks up to 24 months

    OS was defined as the time from start of study drug (Stage 1) until death from any cause. If a patient was not known to have died, survival was censored at the date of last contact.

  2. Overall Response Rate (ORR) Based on Investigator Assessment

    Time frame: Every 6 weeks up to 24 months

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Complete response was defined as disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. Partial response was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Analyses of response rates were performed based on investigators' assessments (as per RECIST 1.1 criteria). ORR included all patients with and without measurable disease at baseline.

  3. Disease Control Rate (DCR)

    Time frame: Every 6 weeks up tp 24 months

    DCR defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of CR or PR or stable disease (SD). Complete response was defined as disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. Partial response was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for PD.

    Analyses of response rates were performed based on investigators' assessments (as per RECIST 1.1 criteria). DCR included all participants with and without measurable disease at baseline.

  4. Time to Response (TTR)

    Time frame: Every 6 weeks up to 24 months

    TTR for a participant was defined as the time from the first treatment date to the date of first documented confirmed CR or PR evaluation. The date of event was defined as the date of response that was first determined and not using the date the response was confirmed.

  5. Duration of Response (DoR)

    Time frame: Every 6 weeks up to 24 months

    DoR was defined as the elapsed time between the date of first documented CR or PR response (not the date of confirmed response) and the following date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

An Open Label Two-stage Study of Orally Administered BKM120 in Patients With Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Activated PI3K Pathway

Acronym: BASALT-1

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Feb 16, 2011
Registry last updated
Mar 11, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.