Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01174823

Safety and Efficacy of Bepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution in Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis Patients

The purpose of this study is to study the safety and efficacy of bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution in allergic conjunctivitis patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

12 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Irvine, California, 92618, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects 12 years of age and older with 2-year history of allergic conjunctivitis

Exclusion criteria

  • No active ocular or nasal infection

Treatment and study plan

bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution

Drug

sterile ophthalmic solution

placebo comparator ophthalmic solution

Drug

sterile ophthalmic solution

Primary outcomes

  1. Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) - Mean Change in Total Score

    Time frame: Baseline, 14 days

    Responses to questions relating to symptoms and daily activities in the RQLQ were provided for 28 questions encompassing the 7 major domains of activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional state. Each response to an RQLQ question was provided on a scale of 0-6 units, where 0 = not troubled/none of the time and 6 = extremely troubled/all of the time. The minimum total score was 0 units and the maximum total score was 42 units, with higher score indicating decreased quality of life due to rhinoconjunctivitis.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Reflective Ocular Itching Scores Over the Treatment Period

    Time frame: Baseline, 14 days

    Ocular itching was graded on a 4-point scale (0-3 units; 0=Absent, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe) twice daily in the Screening Diary (Day -7 to Day -1) and the Subject Diary (Day 0 prior to first dose through Day 13).

  2. Mean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Instantaneous Ocular Redness Scores Over the Treatment Period

    Time frame: Baseline, 14 days

    Ocular redness each was graded on a 4-point scale (0-3 units; 0=Absent, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe) twice daily in the Screening Diary (Day -7 to Day -1) and the Subject Diary (Day 0 prior to first dose through Day 13).

  3. Mean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Proportion of Tearing Episodes Over the Treatment Period

    Time frame: Baseline, 14 days

    Individual nasal symptoms and ocular itching and redness each were graded on a 4-point scale (0-3 units; 0=Absent, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe) BID in the Screening Diary (Day -7 to Day -1) and BID in the Subject Diary (Day 0 prior to first dose through Day 13). Tearing was scored from Day 0 as either absent or present at the same time as nasal and other ocular symptoms were graded. The proportion of participants was calculated and then then average of the proportions.

  4. Mean Change From Baseline for Twice Daily (BID) Averaged Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores Over the Treatment Period

    Time frame: Baseline, 14 days

    Individual nasal symptoms of rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing each were each graded on a 4-point scale (0-3 units; 0=Absent, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe) twice daily in the Screening Diary (Day -7 to Day -1) and the Subject Diary (Day 0 prior to first dose through Day 13). The minimum Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) was 0 units and the maximum TNSS corresponding to multiple individual nasal symptoms scored as severe was 12 units

  5. Global Therapeutic Response Rating - Participant Assessed

    Time frame: 14 days

    Participants were asked if they felt that they had experienced improvement in allergy symptoms after therapy. Participant assessed global therapeutic response rating: categories that the participant could select were 'no change', 'slight improvement', 'improved', or 'marked improvement'.

  6. Global Therapeutic Response Rating - Investigator Assessed

    Time frame: 14 days

    Investigators were asked if they felt that the participant had experienced improvement in allergy symptoms after therapy. Investigator assessed global therapeutic response rating: categories that the investigator could select were 'no change', 'slight improvement', 'improved', or 'marked improvement'.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Industry

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Aug 4, 2010
Registry last updated
Sep 14, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.