Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02462486

Safety and Efficacy of Abicipar Pegol in Participants With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

This is a safety and efficacy study of abicipar pegol in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Save Sight Institute, University of Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration in at least 1 eye
  • Best corrected visual acuity of 20/40 to 20/320 in the study eye
  • Best corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or better in the non-study eye

Exclusion criteria

  • History of vitrectomy, macular surgery, or glaucoma surgery in the study eye
  • Cataract or refractive surgery in the study eye within the last 3 months

Treatment and study plan

Abicipar Pegol

Drug

Abicipar pegol intravitreal injection.

Other names: AGN-150998

ranibizumab

Drug

Ranibizumab intravitreal injection.

Other names: Lucentis®

Sham Procedure

Other

Sham injection.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Stable Vision at Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

    Stable vision was defined as vision loss of fewer than 15 letters in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) from baseline. BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The percentage of participants with a BCVA loss of fewer than 15 letters are reported. Study eye was defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both the eyes met all of the entry criteria, the eye with worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected. If BCVA values for both eyes were identical then participant had to select the non-dominant eye, or else right eye was selected as study eye.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

    BCVA was measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis was used. Study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both the eyes met all of the entry criteria, the eye with worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected. If BCVA values for both eyes were identical then participant had to select the non-dominant eye, or else right eye was selected as study eye.

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) in the Study Eye at Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

    CRT was assessed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), a non-invasive diagnostic system that provides high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. SD-OCT is performed in the study eye after pupil dilation. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from baseline indicates worsening. Study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both the eyes met all of the entry criteria, the eye with worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected. If BCVA values for both eyes were identical then participant had to select the non-dominant eye, or else right eye was selected as study eye. MMRM analysis was used.

  3. Percentage of Participants With BCVA Gain of More Than 15 Letters From Baseline in the Study Eye at Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

    BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The percentage of participants with a BCVA gain of more than 15 letters are noted. Study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both the eyes met all of the entry criteria, the eye with worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected. If BCVA values for both eyes were identical then participant had to select the non-dominant eye, or else right eye was selected as study eye.

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) Composite Score at Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

    NEI-VFQ-25 consists of 25 vision-targeted questions that represent 11 vision-related quality of life subscales and one general health item. Responses of individual participants were recorded as scores that ranged between 0 (worst) to 100 (best vision related function) with higher scale indicating better vision. Overall composite score is then calculated by averaging over all 11 vision-targeted subscale scores, excluding general health score. Overall composite score was calculated based on mean of non-missing subscales. Study eye: eye that meets entry criteria. If both eyes met all of entry criteria, eye with worse BCVA at baseline (day 1) was selected. If BCVA values for both eyes were identical then participant had to select non-dominant eye, or else right eye was selected as study eye. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. MMRM analysis was used.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Allergan

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Safety and Efficacy of Abicipar Pegol (AGN-150998) in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (SEQUOIA Study)

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2019
First posted
Jun 4, 2015
Registry last updated
Jul 30, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.