Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05644236

Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Mouth Wash(Glister Mouth Wash): Pilot Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to examine the efficacy of mouthwash containing 0.045% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) on oral health-related parameters] in [healthy conditions]. The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

* [ Trial 1: effect of immediate-use mouthwash containing CPC vs. non-CPC] * [Trial 2: effect of concentrated-use mouthwash containing CPC vs. non-CPC] Participants will be treated by mouth wash 3 times a day for 4-weeks If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare CPC containing mouthwash group and sham mouthwash groups treated with non CPC-containing mouthwash to see the effect of CPC on plaque index, mouth smell, gingival index and tongue coating index.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

Wŏnju, Ganwon-do, 26426, South Korea

About this study

2.1. Participants In all, 100 subjects were recruited to this clinical study according to the following inclusion criteria: i) Healthy male or female; ii) presence of >20 existing teeth (the number of remaining teeth); iii) no severe pathological soft tissue conditions, periodontitis, or extensive dental plaque; iv) Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (PI) of over 1.5 and Loe & Silness Gingival Index (GI) of over 1.5; vi) able to perform oral care/hygiene tasks on his/her own; vii) voluntary participation; and viii) willing to comply with the test protocol. Participants were excluded if they had any kind of visible or known disease requiring prophylactic antibiotic use.

2.2. Study design This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial, and the intervention was gargling with the OR twice daily. The participants were randomly divided into four groups: control 1 (C1) (n=19), immediate-use CPC (IUC) (n=16), control 2 (C2) (n=19), and concentrated-use CPC (CUC) groups (n=19). Both C1 and C2 received ORs without CPC, whereas the experimental groups IUC and CUC received CPC ORs of different formulations (Amway Korea Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea). Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are analyzed according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle and the per-protocol (PP) approach. ITT aims to assess the experimental design and PP analysis investigates the effect of receiving an assigned treatment. The participants underwent dental scaling before starting the intervention. Ethical approval was granted by the Institutional Research Ethics Review Board, Yonsei University, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital (IRBN CR321058) 2.3. Intervention After obtaining baseline information and randomizing the participants into two groups, dental scaling was performed, followed by clinical treatment. The participants were instructed to gargle twice daily for 7 days. All the participants were instructed not to eat or drink anything for at least 4 hours before the experiment. Oral hygiene, such as gargling and tooth brushing, was prohibited for 8 hours before the visit.

2.4. Measurment of H2S and methyl mercaptan, Quigley-Hein plaque index, Gingival Index,Tongue Coating Index.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy male or female;
  • presence of >20 existing teeth (the number of remaining teeth);
  • no severe pathological soft tissue conditions, periodontitis, or extensive dental plaque;
  • Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (PI) of over 1.5 and Loe & Silness Gingival Index (GI) of over 1.5; • able to perform oral care/hygiene tasks on his/her own;
  • voluntary participation; and viii) willing to comply with the test protocol.

Exclusion criteria

  • They excluded if they had any kind of visible or known disease requiring prophylactic antibiotic use.

Treatment and study plan

mouthwash

Other

After obtaining baseline information and randomizing the participants into two groups, dental scaling was performed, followed by clinical treatment. The participants were instructed to gargle twice daily for 7 days. All the participants were instructed not to eat or drink anything for at least 4 hours before the experiment. Oral hygiene, such as gargling and tooth brushing, was prohibited for 8 hrs before the visit.

Other names: Glister mouthwash

Primary outcomes

  1. hydrogen sulfide(H2S) and methyl mercaptan(CH3SH)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    in the pretreatment versus post-treatment comparisons of the groups, levels of H2S (p < 0.01) and CH3SH (p < 0.01) were reduced significantly in cpc-containing mouthwash group (immediate-use and concentrated-use mouthwash) comparing non-CPC containing sham mouthwash.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quigley-Hein plaque index

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    the PI had decreased in all groups (Figure 3A). However, the IUC group showed significant antiplaque effects compared with the C1 group (p < 0.05). Improvement in periodontal health was seen 14 days after treatment, which was not observed in the CUC group (Figure 3B). Since OR without CPC also improved periodontal health, we further examined the group on day 28 of the trial. In addition, after 28 days, the CUC group showed antiplaque effects (p < 0.05). Overall, the IUC showed superior antiplaque activity and faster periodontal health-promoting effects than the CUC and control formulations.

Other outcomes

  1. Gingival index

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    the highest increase in gingival health was observed 28 days after IUC administration (p < 0.05) (Figure 4A). Similar to the results for the PI, we did not observe significant changes in the gingival health of the C1 and C2 groups. As expected, gingival health improved significantly in the CUC group compared to in the C2 group, which was observed on study days 14 and 28 (Figure 4B).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Dec 9, 2022
Registry last updated
Dec 9, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.