Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03192813

Safety and Efficacy Comparison Of Two TAVI Systems in a Prospective Randomized Evaluation II

Current care randomized clinical trial comparing the CE marked Symetis ACURATE neo™ Aortic Bioprosthesis and ACURATE TF™ Transfemoral Delivery System with the CE marked Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R TAVI system (or any future CE-marked CoreValve versions).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

75 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established and valuable treatment option for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and at high surgical risk for aortic valve replacement. The use of TAVI is rapidly expanding worldwide and its indications are widening into intermediate and lower risk populations. However, device comparisons by use of randomized trials are scarce in particular for newer generation transcatheter valves.

The Symetis ACURATE neo™, a self-expanding transcatheter valve delivered via transfemoral access, is a second-generation device that gained CE mark approval in June 2014.

The SCOPE-II trial will compare the safety and performance of the Symetis ACURATE neo™ with the self-expanding Medtronic Evolut R system, a widely used and well-established transcatheter heart valve, which obtained CE mark in 8NOV2006 and HAS approval on 13JAN2015.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis defined by a mean aortic gradient > 40 mmHg or peak jet velocity > 4.0 m/s or an aortic valve area (AVA) < 1cm2 or AVA indexed to body surface area (BSA) of <0.6 cm2/m2
  • Patient is symptomatic (heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class > I, angina or syncope)
  • Patients are considered at high risk for mortality with conventional surgical aortic valve replacement as assessed by a Heart Team consisting of a cardiologist and surgeon or as confirmed by a logistic EuroSCORE I > 20% and / or STS score > 10%.
  • Aortic annulus diameter ranging from 21 to 26mm and perimeter rage from 66 - 81.7mm , based on ECG-gated multi-slice computed tomographic measurements. Findings of TTE, TEE and conventional aortography should be integrated in the anatomic assessment.
  • Arterial aorto-iliac-femoral axis suitable for transfemoral access as assessed by conventional angiography and/or multi-detector computed tomographic angiography (access vessel diameter ≥ 6mm)
  • Patient understands the purpose, the potential risks as well as benefits of the trial and is willing to participate in all parts of the follow-up
  • Patient age 75 years or older
  • Patient has given written consent to participate in the trial

Exclusion criteria

  • Severely reduced left ventricular (LV) function (ejection fraction <20%)
  • Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in aortic and/or mitral position
  • Participation in another trial, which would lead to deviations in the preparation or performance of the intervention or the post-implantation management from this protocol
  • Severe coagulation conditions
  • Inability to tolerate anticoagulation therapy
  • Contraindication to contrast media or allergy to nitinol
  • Active infection, including endocarditis
  • Congenital aortic stenosis or unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve
  • Non-valvular aortic stenosis
  • Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
  • New or untreated echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation
  • Non-calcific acquired aortic stenosis
  • Severe eccentricity of calcification
  • Anatomy not appropriate for transfemoral implant due to size, disease and degree of calcification or tortuosity of the aorta or ilio-femoral arteries
  • Severe mitral regurgitation

Treatment and study plan

Symetis ACURATE neo™ transfemoral TAVI system

Device

Symetis ACURATE neo™ transfemoral TAVI system: Support frame made of nitinol, supra-annular processed tri-leaflet porcine pericardial valve and an outer skirt to mitigate paravalvular regurgitation (manufactured by Symetis SA, Ecublens, Switzerland).

Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R TAVI System

Device

Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) System (or any future CE-marked Corevalve versions): The support frame is manufactured from nitinol, which has multilevel, self-expanding properties and is radiopaque. The bioprosthesis is manufactured by suturing valve leaflets and a skirt from porcine pericardium into a tri-leaflet configuration (manufactured by Medtronic CoreValve LLC, Santa Ana, USA).

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite of all-cause mortality or stroke rates

    Time frame: 1 year

    The primary objective is to compare the composite of all-cause mortality or stroke rates at 1 year (powered for non-inferiority).

Secondary outcomes

  1. New permanent pacemaker rate

    Time frame: 30 days

    The first secondary objective is to compare the new permanent pacemaker rate at 30 days (powered for superiority).

  2. All cause mortality at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

    All cause mortality

  3. Stroke at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

    Stroke

  4. Valve malpositioning at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

    Valve malpositioning

  5. Peri-procedural myocardial infarction at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

    Peri-procedural myocardial infarction

  6. Cardiac Tamponade at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

    Cardiac Tamponade

  7. Implantation of multiple valves (TAV-in-TAV deployment) at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

    Implantation of multiple valves (TAV-in-TAV deployment)

  8. Annular rupture/dissection at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

    • Annular rupture/dissection
  9. Left ventricular perforation at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

    • Left ventricular perforation
  10. Conversion to open heart surgery at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

    • Conversion to open heart surgery
  11. Intra-procedural mortality (during index procedure)

    Time frame: Procedurally

    • Intra-procedural mortality (during index procedure)
  12. Procedural mortality (up to 72 hours after procedure)

    Time frame: Procedurally and up to 72 hours post-procedurally

    • Procedural mortality (up to 72 hours after procedure)
  13. Mortality (cardiac/non-cardiac) at 30 days and 1 year

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year

    • Mortality (cardiac/non-cardiac)
  14. All stroke (disabling/non disabling) at 30 days and 1 year

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year

    • All stroke (disabling/non disabling)
  15. Composite of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 30 days and 1 year

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year

    • Composite of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke
  16. Hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsened congestive heart at 30 days and 1 year

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year

    • Hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsened congestive heart failure
  17. Life-threatening/major bleeding at 30 days and 1 year

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year

    • Life-threatening/major bleeding (BARC 3b or more)
  18. Myocardial infarction at 30 days and 1 year

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year

    • Myocardial infarction
  19. Valve related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure at 30 days and 1 year

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year

    • Valve related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure (BAV, TAVI or SAVR)
  20. Endocarditis at 30 days and 1 year

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year

    • Endocarditis
  21. Valve thrombosis at 30 days and 1 year

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year

    • Valve thrombosis
  22. New AV-conduction disturbances at 30 days and 1 year

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year

    • New AV-conduction disturbances (LBBB only)
  23. New pacemaker implantation at 1 year

    Time frame: 1 year

    • New pacemaker implantation at 1 year
  24. Any arrhythmia resulting in hemodynamic instability or requiring therapy at 30 days and 1 year

    Time frame: 30 days and 1 year

    Any arrhythmia resulting in hemodynamic instability or requiring therapy

  25. VARC-2 combined endpoints at 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

    Composite of device success, early safety, clinical efficacy and time-related valve safety

  26. Time-related valve safety at 1 year

    Time frame: 1 year

    Time-related valve safety

  27. Echocardiographic endpoint (1)

    Time frame: Post-procedurally [day 1 to 7], at 30 days, 1 year

    • Structural valve deterioration
  28. Echocardiographic endpoint (2)

    Time frame: Post-procedurally [day 1 to 7], at 30 days, 1 year

    • Prosthetic aortic valve stenosis
  29. Echocardiographic endpoint (3)

    Time frame: Post-procedurally [day 1 to 7], at 30 days, 1 year

    • Patient prosthesis mismatch
  30. Echocardiographic endpoint (4)

    Time frame: Post-procedurally [day 1 to 7], at 30 days, 1 year

    • Aortic regurgitation (grading), proportion of more than mild regurgitation
  31. Echocardiographic endpoint (5)

    Time frame: Post-procedurally [day 1 to 7], at 30 days, 1 year

    • Intended valve performance: No prosthesis mismatch, mean aortic valve gradient <20 mmHg or peak velocity <3 m/s, without moderate or severe prosthetic valve aortic regurgitation.
  32. Echocardiographic endpoint (6)

    Time frame: Post-procedurally [day 1 to 7], at 30 days, 1 year

    • Systolic LV ejection fraction
  33. Echocardiographic endpoint (7)

    Time frame: Post-procedurally [day 1 to 7], at 30 days, 1 year

    • LV diastolic function
  34. Echocardiographic endpoint (8)

    Time frame: Post-procedurally [day 1 to 7], at 30 days, 1 year

    • Left atrial volume
  35. Echocardiographic endpoint (9)

    Time frame: Post-procedurally [day 1 to 7], at 30 days, 1 year

    • Right ventricular (RV) dimension and function
  36. Echocardiographic endpoint (10)

    Time frame: Post-procedurally [day 1 to 7], at 30 days, 1 year

    • Right atrial (RA) area
  37. Echocardiographic endpoint (11)

    Time frame: Post-procedurally [day 1 to 7], at 30 days, 1 year

    • RV/RA-ratio and estimated systolic pulmonary arterial pressure

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ceric Sàrl

Industry

Collaborators

  • Symetis SA

Registry information

Official study title

Safety and Efficacy Comparison Of Two TAVI Systems in a Prospective Randomized Evaluation II: A Randomized, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial Evaluating Safety and Clinical Efficacy of the Symetis ACURATE Neo Compared to the Medtronic Evolut R Bioprosthesis in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Acronym: SCOPE II

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jun 20, 2017
Registry last updated
Jun 11, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.