Laboratoires Théa
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France
NCT Number: NCT02017327
Primary objective:
The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of Monoprost® versus Lumigan® 0.01% and Lumigan® 0.03% Unit Dose in term of safety with respect to the assessment of conjunctival hyperaemia in the worse eye at Day 84.
The conjunctival hyperaemia will be scored using the MacMonnies photographic scale (0 to 5).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
3.1 Hyperaemia = Grade (2) or (3) or (4) following the photographic MacMonnies scale.
And 3.2.1 Presence of at least 2 symptoms with a level of severity ≥ 1 (= mild or moderate or severe) among the following 5 symptoms: irritation/burning, itching, tearing, eye dryness sensation, foreign body sensation.
And/Or 3.2.2 Presence of at least 2 signs with a level of severity ≥ 1 (= mild or moderate or severe) among the following 3 signs: superficial punctate keratitis, blepharitis, eyelid skin darkness.
Exclusion criteria
Systemic/non ophthalmic/ exclusion criteria
Specific exclusion criteria for women
Monoprost®: Latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic preparation is a sterile unpreserved oil-based solution for topical ophthalmic use. It is supplied in 0.30 ml single use polyethylene containers. The batch numbers and reanalysis dates will be stated in the certificate of analysis.
Other names: Latanoprost 0.005%
Lumigan® 0.01%: Bimatoprost eye drop solution is supplied in 3 ml multidose container.
Other names: Bimatoprost 0.1mg/ml
Lumigan® 0.03% Unit Dose: Bimatoprost eye drop solution is supplied in 0.4 ml single use low density polyethylene (LDPE) containers.
Other names: Bimatoprost 0.3mg/ML
Time frame: Day 84
The primary endpoint is the change from baseline of conjunctival hyperaemia assessed on MacMonnies' 6 point ordinal scale, in the worse eye at the D84 visit. The primary statistical hypothesis tested is that Monoprost® is superior to Lumigan® 0.03% Unit Dose with regard to this primary endpoint, i.e. that in the worse eye the decrease from baseline in the MacMonnies 6 point ordinal scale is greater in the Monoprost® treated group than in the Lumigan® 0.03% Unit Dose group at the Day 84 visit.
The conjunctival hyperaemia will be scored using the "McMonnies" photographic scale (0 to 5). The minimum score is 0 corresponding to a low hyperaemia and the maximum score is 5 corresponding to a higher hyperaemia.
The Rows represent the number of participants with a change from Baseline to D84 corresponding to
Laboratoires Thea
Industry
Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Monoprost® in Comparison With Lumigan® 0.01% and Lumigan® 0.03% Unit Dose, in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension, Stabilized by Lumigan® 0.01% With Ocular Surface Intolerance
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06144918
Eye Diseases, Glaucoma
Glendale, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04830397
Eye Diseases, Glaucoma
Albany, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05022004
Eye Diseases, Glaucoma
Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India
View Trial DetailsNCT04742283
Eye Diseases, Glaucoma
Chandler, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details