Tennessee Clinical Research Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37215, United States
NCT Number: NCT04032977
To compare the safety and efficacy profile of PN40082 versus Restylane Silk Injectable Gel with 0.3% lidocaine (Restylane Silk) for lip augmentation in approximately 158 subjects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Nashville, Tennessee, 37215, United States
The objective of the study is to compare the safety and efficacy profile of PN40082 versus Restylane Silk Injectable Gel with 0.3% lidocaine (Restylane Silk) for lip augmentation. Approximately 158 subjects will be randomized at approximately 7 sites in this is a double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical study of subjects seeking lip augmentation. Subjects meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized 1:1 to treatment with either PN40082 or Restylane Silk. The Evaluating Investigator will be blinded to the treatment. Injections of the study device will be performed by an unblinded Treating Investigator.
At each visit, the blinded Evaluating Investigator evaluations and subject evaluations of the treated areas will be performed and recorded. Visits and telephone contacts will occur at:
Visit 1 / Week 0 (Day 1) - baseline and treatment
Evaluations include:
Lip Fullness Grading Scale (LFGS) (Overall lip fullness considering both lips together, fullness of the upper lip and fullness of the lower lip) Perioral lines at rest severity scale (POL) (Overall perioral lines at rest severity considering both lips together, perioral lines at rest severity of the upper lip and perioral lines at rest severity of the lower lip) Patient Global Aesthetic Improvement (pGAI) Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement (iGAI) Safety will be assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) at all study visits
Other Safety Evaluations include:
Lip Function Lip Sensation
Other evaluations include:
Investigator Ease of Use Assessment Swelling Assessment Subject Satisfaction with Lips Assessment Subjects participation will be approximately 6 months and the study is estimated to last 20 months from first subject first visit to last subject last visit.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
To provide a 1-point improvement in the lip fullness grading scale score of subjects with very thin or thin lips or subjects with Fitzpatrick IV, V or VI to improve the LFGS score by 1 for 1 or both lips
To provide a 1-point improvement in the lip fullness grading scale score of subjects with very thin or thin lips or subjects with Fitzpatrick IV, V or VI to improve the LFGS score by 1 for 1 or both lips
Time frame: Visit 1 baseline to Visit 3 Month 2, 56 days
The Lip Fullness Grading Scale is a 5 point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) up to 4 being full lips (better outcome)
Time frame: Visit 1 baseline to Visit 3 Month 2, 56 days
Percent of subjects with Lip Fullness treatment success (responder: overall LFGS based on the Blinded Evaluating Investigator Assessment) at Visit 3/Month 2 where responder is defined as a subject with at least a 1-grade increase from baseline on the LFGS post augmentation The lip fullness grading scale is a 5 point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) to 4 being full lips (better outcome)
Time frame: Visit 1 baseline to Visit 4 Month 3, 84 days
Percent of responders with Perioral Lines Treatment Success overall on the POL severity scale at Visit 4/Month 3 (defined as a subject demonstrating ≥ 1-point improvement, i.e., decrease in severity, from baseline. The Perioral Lines at rest severity scale is a 4 point rating scale with 0 = None, a mouth with no perioral lines (better outcome) to 3 = Severe, being a mouth with many deep lines or crevices (worse outcome)
Time frame: Visit 1 baseline to Visit 4 Month 3, 84 days
The lip fullness grading scale is a 5 point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) to 4 being full lips (better outcome)
Time frame: Visit 1 baseline to Visit 5 Month 6, 168 days
The lip fullness grading scale is a 5 point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) to 4 being full lips (better outcome)
Prollenium Medical Technologies Inc.
Industry
A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of PN40082 for Lip Augmentation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06961305
Aesthetic, Lip Augmentation
Katowice, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT05342753
Lip Augmentation
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06858007
Lip Augmentation
Timișoara, Timiș County, Romania
View Trial DetailsNCT04540913
Lip, Lip Augmentation
Bradenton, Florida, United States
View Trial Details