Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06142643

Safety and Effectiveness Clinical Evaluation of Injectable Medical Devices Viscol

Evaluation of safety and performance of HA based injectable device for skin quality improvement

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

35 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Kylane Laboratoires

Plan-les-Ouates, 1228, Switzerland

About this study

The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of the device used one month (M1) after treatment using clinical evaluation of the global aesthetic improvement (GAIS) rated by an independent investigator.

The secondary objectives of the study are to collect data on:

  • the effectiveness four months (M4) after treatment.
  • the effectiveness on the improvement of facial skin quality by objective measurements of skin biomechanical parameters using Cutometer® and skin hydration using Moisturemeter®.
  • subject's satisfaction and subject's opinion on aesthetic improvement.
  • the injector's satisfaction on the injection quality.
  • the safety using clinical evaluation of the Injection Site Reactions (ISR).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy Subject.
  • Sex: male or female.
  • Age: between 35 and 70 years.
  • Subject seeking an improvement for HA skin quality improvement product.
  • Subject with BMI <30.
  • Subject whose weight did not fluctuate in the last 6 months and who agrees to keep a stable weight during the study.
  • Subject having given his/her free, express, and informed consent.
  • Subject psychologically able to understand the information related to the study, and to give their written informed consent.
  • Subject registered with a social security scheme.
  • Women of childbearing potential should use a contraceptive method considered effective since at least 12 weeks and throughout the study

Exclusion criteria

In terms of population

  • Pregnant or nursing woman or planning a pregnancy during the study.
  • Subject who had been deprived of their freedom by administrative or legal decision or who is under guardianship.
  • Subject in a social or sanitary establishment.
  • Subject suspected to be non-compliant according to the investigator's judgment.
  • Subject having received a total of 6.000 euros as compensations for their participation in clinical research in the last 12 months, including their participation in the present study.
  • Subject enrolled in another study or whose non-enrollment period is not over.
  • Subject with scar(s), mole(s), hair or any other lesion on the studied zones which might interfere with the evaluation (tattoo, permanent make-up…). In terms of associated pathology
  • Subject suffering from a severe or progressive disease or any other pathology that may interfere with the evaluation of the study results and/or subject safety.
  • Subject with known history of or suffering from autoimmune disease and/or immune deficiency.
  • Subject suffering from active disease such as inflammation, infection, tumours, inflammatory and/or infectious cutaneous disorders (herpes, acne, rosacea, porphyria …) in the 6 months before screening visit.
  • Subject with a history of streptococcal disease or an active streptococcus infection.
  • Subject prone to develop inflammatory skin conditions or having tendency to bleeding disorders

Treatment and study plan

Dermal Filler Device

Device

Injection of the device by investigators according to the IFU

Primary outcomes

  1. Performance at 1 Month Investigator Overall VISCOL Range

    Time frame: 1 month

    Primary endpoint was the percentage of subjects having an improvement of the zone treated with the overall FILLGEL range of devices, in all the indications, as assessed by the independent investigator, one month after treatment, using the GAIS (subjects with a GAIS "improved", "much improved" or "very much improved"). This proportion of responders was compared to a theoretical proportion of 60%.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Performance at 4 Months Investigator Overall VISCOL Range

    Time frame: 4 months

    Percentage of responders (subjects with a GAIS "improved", "much improved" and "very much improved") for the whole VISCOL range.

  2. Percentage of Indications With Response: GAIS Investigator Overall VISCOL Range

    Time frame: 1 month & 4 months

    Responder rate for the whole indication of VISCOL range at M1 and M4- GAIS investigator (N=95 indications).

    Percentage of responders (subjects with a GAIS "Very Much Improved", "Much Improved" or "Improved") for the whole VISCOL range as assessed by an independent investigator.

  3. Performance at 1 & 4 Months Subject Overall VISCOL Range

    Time frame: 1 month, 4 months

    Percentage of responders for the whole VISCOL range as assessed by the subject. This percentage of responders was compared to a theoretical proportion of 60%

  4. Percentage of Indications With Response: GAIS Subject Overall VISCOL Range

    Time frame: 1 month & 4 months

    Responder rate for the whole indication of VISCOL range at M1 and M4- GAIS subject (N=95 indications) Percentage of responders (subjects with a GAIS "Very Much Improved", "Much Improved" or "Improved") for the whole VISCOL range as assessed by the subject.

  5. Percentage of Responder With Response: GAIS Investigator by Indication Overall VISCOL Range

    Time frame: 1 month & 4 months

    Responder rate for the whole VISCOL range by indication at M1 and M4- GAIS combined score (investigator and subjects) (N=95 indications).

    It represents the percentage of responders (subjects with a GAIS "Very Much Improved", "Much Improved" or "Improved") for the whole VISCOL range by indication as assessed by the subject as well as by the investigator.

  6. Injector Satisfaction Questionnaire Viscol

    Time frame: D0 (Immediatly after injection)

    Distribution of each item of the questionnaire answered by the injectors. For each item of the injector questionnaire, the percentage of answers "very satisfied" and satisfied were computed as "Satisfied" and the percentage of answers "Neither satisfied" ,or "dissatisfied", "dissatisfied" and "very dissatisfied" were computed as Dissatisfied.

    The measure reported is the percentage of participants who were "Satisfied".

  7. Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire Viscol

    Time frame: 1 month, 4 months

    Distribution of each item of the questionnaire answered by the subjects injected with Viscol. For each item of the subject questionnaire, the percentage of answers "totally agree" and "agree" were computed as "Agree" and the percentage of answers "Neither agree and disagree",or "disagree" and "totally disagree" and "very dissatisfied" were computed as "Disagree".

    The measure reported is the percentage of participants who "Agree".

  8. Percentage of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events

    Time frame: 6 months

    Percentage of participants who experienced at least one Adverse Event (AE), Adverse Device Effect (ADE), and/or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kylane Laboratoires

Industry

Collaborators

  • Eurofins Dermscan Pharmascan

Registry information

Official study title

Safety and Effectiveness Clinical Evaluation of Range of Injectable Medical Devices Viscol in Aesthetic Treatment

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Nov 21, 2023
Registry last updated
Aug 27, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.