Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05105789

Safe and Healthy Schools

This study will target Madison Metropolitan School District (MMSD) school children ages 4-19 and staff who have not had a previous positive COVID-19 test within the past 3 months. It will enroll children and adults for 1-3 days to explore whether serial "at-home" BinaxNOW testing is feasible and non-inferior to "at school" single PCR testing for the evaluation of symptomatic individuals with a negative initial BinaxNOW. It will also explore whether lollipop swabs are more acceptable and perform as well as nasal swabs with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

4 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Community Locations

Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States

About this study

Study Design: This is a quantitative community-based study, conducted in the K-12 setting with school children 4-19 years old, teachers, and staff.

If a participant's initial at-school BinaxNOW test is positive, then they will only complete the lollipop swab for PCR testing. They will NOT do the at-home BinaxNOW test.

If a participant's initial at-school BinaxNOW test is negative, then they will complete both the lollipop swab for PCR testing AND an at-home BinaxNOW test approximately 24 hours later.

If the participant is unwilling or unable to complete the at-home test, they will be presented with a lollipop swab only option.

Aim 1: The investigators will test the hypothesis that serial at-home BinaxNOW testing will be feasible and non-inferior to the single at-school PCR testing program. To do this, the investigators will distribute over-the-counter BinaxNOW antigen tests to volunteer families, and create a protocol to ensure families can perform and report test results accurately to the school.

Two key questions will be addressed:

  • Is 'at-home' BinaxNOW testing feasible for families?
  • Is serial 'at-home' BinaxNOW testing non-inferior to 'at-school' single PCR testing?

Aim 2: The investigators will test the hypothesis that lollipop swabs are more acceptable to individuals and PCR testing is non-inferior to performing PCR on nasal swabs. To test this hypothesis, the investigators will work with MMSD schools to incorporate a lollipop swab for PCR at the time a symptomatic student or staff receives a nasal swab for PCR that is part of the Department of Health Services (DHS) program.

Two key questions will be addressed:

  • Are lollipop swabs more acceptable to individuals when compared to nasal swabs?
  • Will lollipop swabs perform as well as nasal swabs with PCR-based testing?

Hypotheses to be tested:

  • Aim 1.1: "At-home" BinaxNOW testing will be feasible for families.
  • Aim 1.2: Serial "at-home" BinaxNOW testing is non-inferior to "at school" single PCR testing.
  • Aim 2.1: Lollipop swabs are more acceptable to individuals than nasal swabs.
  • Aim 2.2: Lollipop swabs will perform as well as nasal swabs with PCR-based testing.

Protocol Amendment 2/4/22 to expand the upper eligible age for children from 14 to 19 years and to recognize the potential supply chain limitations of BinaxNOW tests. If the study team does not have any BinaxNOW tests due to a supply shortage, the BinaxNOW procedures will be dropped and only the lollipop swab will be collected.

Protocol Amendment 5/16/22 extends the study timeline and adds a lollipop swab only option.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • school children ages 4-19
  • MMSD staff
  • have at least one symptom of COVID-19
  • have not had a positive COVID-19 test in the past 3 months
  • will undergo nasal PCR testing at an MMSD elementary school

Exclusion criteria

  • received a positive COVID-19 test in the past 3 months

Criteria for inclusion in the final study sample:

  • Aim 1. Symptomatic participants with a negative at-school BinaxNOW test and nasal PCR results who complete both the lollipop PCR and at-home BinaxNOW tests within 72 hours will be included in the final study sample.
  • Aim 2. Symptomatic participants who provide a lollipop swab that is successfully resulted.

Criteria for exclusion in the final study sample:

  • Aim 1
  • Missing nasal PCR result
  • Do not successfully complete an at-home BinaxNOW test within 72 hours of the at-school BinaxNOW test
  • Aim 2
  • Missing nasal PCR result
  • Missing lollipop PCR result

Treatment and study plan

BinaxNOW Test

Diagnostic Test

diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2

Other names: BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card

"Lollipop" swab

Diagnostic Test

A lollipop swab, is an oral swab to collect saliva, sucked on like a lollipop for 20 seconds.

Primary outcomes

  1. Standard Diagnostic Test Outcomes for BinaxNOW at Home Testing as Compared to Nasal Swab PCR

    Time frame: up to 2 days

    The primary diagnostic outcome measure will be the negative predictive value (NPV). The kappa values for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and NPV of the BinaxNOW at Home testing with respect to PCR nasal swab (gold standard) are reported here.

  2. Frequency Table of Gold-Standard Nasal Swab PCR vs Lollipop Swab PCR COVID-19 Test Results

    Time frame: up to 2 days

    Counts of negative and positive Nasal Swab vs. Lollipop Swab PCR COVID-19 tests with kappa statistical value.

  3. Standard Diagnostic Test Outcomes for Lollipop Swab PCR Testing as Compared to Nasal Swab PCR

    Time frame: up to 2 days

    The kappa values for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and NPV of the Lollipop Swab PCR with respect to PCR nasal swab (gold standard) are reported here.

  4. Number of Successfully Completed At-home Tests

    Time frame: up to 24 hours

    Feasibility of 'at-home' BinaxNOW testing will be determined by number of successfully completed at-home tests. At-home test taking will be monitored by study team remotely (via zoom or similar).

  5. Percent of Participants Who Answer 'Yes' When Asked if Lollipop Swabs Are More Acceptable Than Nasal Swabs

    Time frame: up to 1 day

    To address the acceptability of lollipop swabs vs nasal swabs, the study team will ask participants a binary question: Are lollipop swabs more acceptable to participants when compared to nasal swabs? Yes/No.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Nov 3, 2021
Registry last updated
May 22, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.