Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT03507049

Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Versus Sham Operation for Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain

Sacroiliac joint fusion versus sham operasjon for treatment of sacroiliac pain. A prospective double blinded randomized controlled multicentre study.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Sacroiliac(SI) joint pain can lead to long-lasting severe pain and reduce physical function. It is shown to be the source of pain in 13-30% of patients with low back pain. Former surgical techniques had a high level of complications and low success rates. Newer mini-invasive surgical approaches have shown promising results in scientific studies. It is difficult to find an adequate control group for surgery as most patients already have tried conservative and alternative treatments without effect. A sham-designed study is the best alternative. This study is designed as a prospective randomized double blinded controlled mulitcenter trial. The investigators want to examine whether there is a difference in SI joint pain in patients operated with miniinvasive arthrodesis of the SI joint compared to a sham operated control group. Patients with SI joint pain are included. They will be randomized to either surgery with arthrodesis or sham surgery. Neither patient nor health personell who work with the patient after the surgery will know what has been done. The primary end point for the study is group difference in sacroiliac joint pain on the operated side after 6 months.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 21-70 at time of screening
  • Patient with suspected SIJ pain for >6 months or >18 months for pregnancy induced pelvic girdle pain.
  • Diagnosis of the SI joint as the primary pain generator based on ALL of the following:

A. Patient has pain at or close to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) with possible radiation into buttocks, posterior thigh or groin and can point with a single finger to the location of pain (Fortin Finger Test)

B. Patient has at least 3 of 6 physical examination maneuvers specific for SI joint pain:

  • Compression
  • Posterior Pelvic Pain Provocation test - P4 (Thigh Thrust)
  • Palpation of the long dorsal ligament
  • Patrick's test (Faber)
  • Leg Raise (ASLR )
  • Geanslens test

C. Patient has improvement in lower back pain NRS of at least 50% of the pre injection NRS score after fluoroscopic controlled injection of local anesthetic into affected SI joint (including previous documented test <6 months ago)

  • Baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of at least 30%
  • Baseline lower back pain score of at least 5 on 0-10 point NRS
  • Patient should have tried adequate forms of conservative treatment with little or no response.
  • Patient has signed study-specific informed consent
  • Patient has the necessary mental capacity to participate and is physically able to comply with study protocol requirements.
  • Patients with unilateral or bilateral pain can be included in the study if they clearly can differentiate between the two sides. It is the most painful side that will be included and randomized to SIJ fusion or sham surgery in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe low back pain due to other causes, such as lumbar disc degeneration, lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spondylolisthesis, lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar facet degeneration, and lumbar vertebral body fracture.
  • Sacroiliac pathology caused by auto-immune disease (e.g. ankylosing spondylitis) and/or neoplasia (e.g. benign or malignant tumor) and/or crystal arthropathy
  • History of recent (<1 year) fracture of the pelvis with documented malunion, non-union of sacrum or ilium or any type of internal fixation of the pelvic ring.
  • Spine surgery during the past 12 months.
  • Previously diagnosed or suspected osteoporosis (defined as prior T-score <-2.5 or history of osteoporotic fracture)
  • Documented osteomalacia or other metabolic bone disease
  • Any condition or anatomy that makes treatment with the iFuse Implant System infeasible
  • Patients with prior successful fusion to the contra lateral side are exluded from the study.

Treatment and study plan

iFuse

Procedure

ifuse will be implanted as described in section on the active comparator arm of the study.

Other names: SI Bone iFuse

sham group

Procedure

sham surgery will be performed as desrcribed in section on sham comparator.

Other names: Sham surgery

fMRI study

Radiation

Quantitative sensory testing, cerebral MRI and functional MRI will be done to examine pain mechanism and activation in the central nervous system.

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary outcome measure - Numeric Rating Scale operated side

    Time frame: 6 months

    the primary endpoint is group difference in Numeric Rating Scale(NRS) pain-score on the operated side at six months postoperatively. Numeric rating scale is a pain-score scale from 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst possible pain.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Baseline NRS

    Time frame: baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months

    Change from baseline Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain-score on the operated side at 3,6,12 and 24 months

  2. Global NRS

    Time frame: baseline,3 ,6 ,12 ,24 months

    Change from baseline global NRS at 3,6,12 and 24 months

  3. NRS on non-operated side

    Time frame: baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 months

    Change from baseline in non-operated side NRS at 3,6,12 and 24 months

  4. NRS leg pain

    Time frame: baseline, 3,6,12,24 months

    Change from baseline leg pain NRS at 3,6,12,24 months

  5. Oswestry disability index (ODI)

    Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months

    Change in disability due to pelvic pain measured by Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) at 3,6,12,24 months

  6. Pelvic girdle questionnaire

    Time frame: baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 months

    Change in disability due to pelvic pain measured by Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire(PGQ) at 3,6,12,24 months

  7. Quality of life (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 months

    Change in quality of life measured by EQ-5D at 3,6,12,24 months

  8. Device breakage, loosening or migration on CT of the sacroiliac joint

    Time frame: 12 months

    Device breakage loosening or migration at 12 months judged by clinical symptoms and CT of the sacroiliac joint.

Other outcomes

  1. Adverse events

    Time frame: 3,6,12,24 months

    registration of any adverse events after procedure completed

  2. Change in Compression test of the sacroiliac joint

    Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months

    Change in compression test of the sacroiliac joint which is an objective clinical test. Outcome is negative or positive test dependent on whether pain is provoked or not in the sacroiliac joint.

  3. Change in Posterior Pelvic Pain Provocation (P4) test of the sacroiliac joint

    Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months

    Change in Posterior Pelvic pain Provocation (P4) test of the sacroiliac joint which is an objective clinical test. Outcome is negative or positive test dependent on whether pain is provoked or not in the sacroiliac joint.

  4. Change in Palpation of long dorsal ligament as test of the sacroiliac joint

    Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months

    Change in Palpation of long dorsal ligament as test of the sacroiliac joint which is an objective clinical test. Outcome is negative or positive test dependent on whether pain is provoked or not along the ligament.

  5. Change in Patricks (FABER) test of the sacroiliac joint

    Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months

    Change in Patricks (FABER) test of the sacroiliac joint which is an objective clinical test. Outcome is negative or positive test dependent on whether pain is provoked or not in the sacroiliac joint. .

  6. Change in active straight leg raise test (ASLR) of the sacroiliac joint

    Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months

    Change in active straight leg raise test(ASLR) of the sacroiliac joint which is an objective clinical test. Results are recorded on a grad 0 to 5, where not difficult at all = 0; minimally difficult = 1; somewhat difficult = 2; fairly difficult = 3; very difficult = 4; unable to do = 5.

  7. Change in Gaenslens test

    Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months

    Change in Gaenslens test which is an objective clinical tests for the sacroiliac joint. Outcome is recorded as positive or negative test dependent on whether pain is provoked or not in the sacroiliac joint.

  8. 6 minute walk test to record ambulatory status

    Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months.

    Patients will be tested with 6minute walk test to test ambulatory status. The test is performed by marking a distance equal to 50meters. The patient is instructed to walk back and forth between the marks as quickly and as many times as they manage in 6 minutes. The total distance walked is recorded.

  9. Timed up and og test to record ambulatory status

    Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months.

    Patients will be tested with Timed up and go, to test ambulatory status.Timed up and go test the time it takes the patient to get up from a Chair, walk 3 meters and back and be seated again.

  10. Work status

    Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months.

    Patients will be asked to fill out standardized questionnaire on work status

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Oslo University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Karolinska University Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Versus Sham Operation for Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain. A Prosepctive Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.

Acronym: SIFSO

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2030
First posted
Apr 24, 2018
Registry last updated
Jul 11, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.