iFuse
Procedureifuse will be implanted as described in section on the active comparator arm of the study.
Other names: SI Bone iFuse
NCT Number: NCT03507049
Sacroiliac joint fusion versus sham operasjon for treatment of sacroiliac pain. A prospective double blinded randomized controlled multicentre study.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me21 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Sacroiliac(SI) joint pain can lead to long-lasting severe pain and reduce physical function. It is shown to be the source of pain in 13-30% of patients with low back pain. Former surgical techniques had a high level of complications and low success rates. Newer mini-invasive surgical approaches have shown promising results in scientific studies. It is difficult to find an adequate control group for surgery as most patients already have tried conservative and alternative treatments without effect. A sham-designed study is the best alternative. This study is designed as a prospective randomized double blinded controlled mulitcenter trial. The investigators want to examine whether there is a difference in SI joint pain in patients operated with miniinvasive arthrodesis of the SI joint compared to a sham operated control group. Patients with SI joint pain are included. They will be randomized to either surgery with arthrodesis or sham surgery. Neither patient nor health personell who work with the patient after the surgery will know what has been done. The primary end point for the study is group difference in sacroiliac joint pain on the operated side after 6 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
A. Patient has pain at or close to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) with possible radiation into buttocks, posterior thigh or groin and can point with a single finger to the location of pain (Fortin Finger Test)
B. Patient has at least 3 of 6 physical examination maneuvers specific for SI joint pain:
C. Patient has improvement in lower back pain NRS of at least 50% of the pre injection NRS score after fluoroscopic controlled injection of local anesthetic into affected SI joint (including previous documented test <6 months ago)
Exclusion criteria
ifuse will be implanted as described in section on the active comparator arm of the study.
Other names: SI Bone iFuse
sham surgery will be performed as desrcribed in section on sham comparator.
Other names: Sham surgery
Quantitative sensory testing, cerebral MRI and functional MRI will be done to examine pain mechanism and activation in the central nervous system.
Time frame: 6 months
the primary endpoint is group difference in Numeric Rating Scale(NRS) pain-score on the operated side at six months postoperatively. Numeric rating scale is a pain-score scale from 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst possible pain.
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change from baseline Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain-score on the operated side at 3,6,12 and 24 months
Time frame: baseline,3 ,6 ,12 ,24 months
Change from baseline global NRS at 3,6,12 and 24 months
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 months
Change from baseline in non-operated side NRS at 3,6,12 and 24 months
Time frame: baseline, 3,6,12,24 months
Change from baseline leg pain NRS at 3,6,12,24 months
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months
Change in disability due to pelvic pain measured by Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) at 3,6,12,24 months
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 months
Change in disability due to pelvic pain measured by Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire(PGQ) at 3,6,12,24 months
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 months
Change in quality of life measured by EQ-5D at 3,6,12,24 months
Time frame: 12 months
Device breakage loosening or migration at 12 months judged by clinical symptoms and CT of the sacroiliac joint.
Time frame: 3,6,12,24 months
registration of any adverse events after procedure completed
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months
Change in compression test of the sacroiliac joint which is an objective clinical test. Outcome is negative or positive test dependent on whether pain is provoked or not in the sacroiliac joint.
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months
Change in Posterior Pelvic pain Provocation (P4) test of the sacroiliac joint which is an objective clinical test. Outcome is negative or positive test dependent on whether pain is provoked or not in the sacroiliac joint.
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months
Change in Palpation of long dorsal ligament as test of the sacroiliac joint which is an objective clinical test. Outcome is negative or positive test dependent on whether pain is provoked or not along the ligament.
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months
Change in Patricks (FABER) test of the sacroiliac joint which is an objective clinical test. Outcome is negative or positive test dependent on whether pain is provoked or not in the sacroiliac joint. .
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months
Change in active straight leg raise test(ASLR) of the sacroiliac joint which is an objective clinical test. Results are recorded on a grad 0 to 5, where not difficult at all = 0; minimally difficult = 1; somewhat difficult = 2; fairly difficult = 3; very difficult = 4; unable to do = 5.
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months
Change in Gaenslens test which is an objective clinical tests for the sacroiliac joint. Outcome is recorded as positive or negative test dependent on whether pain is provoked or not in the sacroiliac joint.
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months.
Patients will be tested with 6minute walk test to test ambulatory status. The test is performed by marking a distance equal to 50meters. The patient is instructed to walk back and forth between the marks as quickly and as many times as they manage in 6 minutes. The total distance walked is recorded.
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months.
Patients will be tested with Timed up and go, to test ambulatory status.Timed up and go test the time it takes the patient to get up from a Chair, walk 3 meters and back and be seated again.
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6,12, 24 months.
Patients will be asked to fill out standardized questionnaire on work status
Oslo University Hospital
Other
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Versus Sham Operation for Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain. A Prosepctive Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.
Acronym: SIFSO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04381208
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
Valencia, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05944861
Sacroiliac Joint Pain, Sacroiliac Joint Somatic Dysfunction
Ankara, Cankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05181579
Sacroiliac Joint Somatic Dysfunction
Ankara, Cankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05347537
Disability Physical, Neurologic Manifestations
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details