Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200032, China
NCT Number: NCT07662863
The main goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a new targeted cancer drug called sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) works to treat cancer while causing less nerve damage in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who have progressed on or could not tolerate previous treatment such as enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) or disitamab vedotin plus toripalimab (DVT).
The main question it aims to answer is: Does sac-TMT lower the risk of getting severe nerve damage, as measured together by doctors, machines, and the participants?
Researchers will compare sac-TMT to alternative MMAE-based ADC drugs (switching to a different MMAE-based ADC after the first one stopped working) to see if sac-TMT causes less nerve damage while still effectively treating the cancer. A small group of participants who had to stop their previous MMAE-based ADC treatment because of nerve damage will also receive sac-TMT to learn if the drug is safe for their nerves.
Participants will:
1. Receive either sac-TMT or another MMAE-based ADC drug 2. Have regular physical exams by a doctor to check their nerves 3. Have machine tests to measure how well their nerves work 4. Answer survey questions about their pain, numbness, and daily activities
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200032, China
Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is associated with a poor prognosis, and traditional platinum-based chemotherapy offers limited clinical benefit with significant toxicity. In recent years, the emergence of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has transformed the treatment landscape of mUC. Nectin-4-directed enfortumab vedotin (EV) and HER2-directed disitamab vedotin (DV) have demonstrated breakthrough survival benefits in multiple pivotal clinical studies. EV plus pembrolizumab (EVP) and DV plus toripalimab (DVT) have been approved and are increasingly adopted as first-line treatments for mUC, with growing utilization in Chinese clinical practice.
However, as patient survival extends, the long-term safety profile of ADCs has become a major clinical challenge. Both EV and DV utilize MMAE as their cytotoxic payload, a potent microtubule- targeting agent. Non-specific uptake of these ADCs may lead to the release of MMAE within peripheral nerves, potentially causing microtubule dysregulation. By interfering with microtubule dynamics and inhibiting microtubule-dependent axonal transport, MMAE is thought to contribute to the development of peripheral neuropathy. Clinical data indicate that EV and DV cause a high incidence of peripheral neuropathy. Numbness, pain, and motor dysfunction significantly impair patients' activities of daily living (ADLs). Given the absence of effective prophylactic or therapeutic agents for peripheral neuropathy, clinical management is currently limited to dose reductions or complete treatment discontinuation, which will inevitably diminish anti-tumor efficacy.
Sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) is a novel TROP2-directed ADC delivering a topoisomerase I (Topo-I) inhibitor payload. This payload induces DNA double-strand breaks within the cell nucleus, completely avoiding interference with the cytoskeletal microtubule system. This mechanistic difference fundamentally eliminates the biological basis for axonal transport blockade. Preliminary data from the Phase 1/2 MK-2870-001/KL264-01 study showed that sac-TMT achieved an overall objective response rate (ORR) of 31% and a median overall survival (OS) of 12.1 months in previously treated mUC patients, demonstrating a favorable efficacy profile. Notably, no typical drug-related peripheral neurotoxicity events were observed, highlighting a neuroprotective advantage.
The SPARE-UC-01 study is a head-to-head, Phase II clinical trial to compare the neurotoxicity and anti-tumor efficacy of sac-TMT versus sequential MMAE-based ADC therapy. The study targets a population that has progressed on or is intolerant to prior EVP or DVT. By comparing sac-TMT to the sequential use of alternative MMAE-based ADCs, the research aims to provide an evidence-based sequential treatment strategy. The study utilizes an integrated evaluation system designed to quantitatively capture the spectrum of neurotoxicity. This includes investigator-assessed NCI-CTCAE v5.0 scoring of Peripheral Neuropathy Progression Rate (PNPR), instrument-based nerve conduction studies (NCS), and patient- reported quality-of-life outcomes (PROs). Such a three-dimensional paradigm ensures that both structural nerve damage and functional disability are accurately documented. In view of the substantial population of patients who undergo discontinuation of MMAE-ADCs due to cumulative neurotoxicity, an observational cohort has been established within this study. This cohort aims to characterize the clinical utility of sac-TMT in these patients. Given that its payload does not target the microtubule system, sac-TMT is expected to provide effective treatment without introducing additional neurotoxicity.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Cohort A/B: Baseline peripheral neuropathy (PN) Grade 0-1 (per NCI-CTCAE v5.0) with stable nerve function confirmed by Nerve Conduction Study (NCS) during screening.
Cohort C (Observational): Baseline PN Grade 2, or a history of PN > Grade 2 where the investigator deems the patient unsuitable for MMAE-based ADC treatment.
Exclusion criteria
4.0 mg/kg intravenously administered on Day 1 every 2 weeks.
Other names: sac-TMT, SKB264, MK-2870
EV (Enfortumab Vedotin): 1.25 mg/kg administered intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 of every 4 weeks.
DV (Disitamab Vedotin): 2.0 mg/kg administered intravenously on Day 1 of every 2 weeks.
Other names: EV, DV
4.0 mg/kg intravenously administered on Day 1 every 2 weeks.
Other names: sac-TMT, SKB264, MK-2870
Time frame: From randomization up to the end of treatment (approximately 24 months).
The PNPR is defined as the proportion of participants who experience their first occurrence of treatment-emergent peripheral neurotoxicity of Grade 2 or higher from the time of randomization until the end of treatment.
Neurotoxicity severity is graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0, a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from Grade 1 (mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only) to Grade 5 (death related to adverse event). Higher grades indicate worse outcomes (i.e., more severe neurotoxicity).
The difference in PNPR between treatment arms will be analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test, adjusted for stratification factors specified in the protocol.
Time frame: Baseline, and at protocol-specified time points (including the time of first occurrence of Grade ≥2 neurotoxicity symptoms) during the treatment period, up to approximately 24 months.
The NCS percentage change is calculated as the relative change in electrophysiological parameters from baseline to each post-baseline assessment. The formula used is: [(Post-baseline Value - Baseline Value) / Baseline Value] × 100%.
Time frame: From randomization up to the end of treatment (approximately 24 months).
Cumulative Neurotoxicity Burden (CNB) quantifies total peripheral neurotoxicity exposure, incorporating both severity and duration. Neurotoxicity grades are assigned using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0, a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from Grade 1 (mild) to Grade 5 (death); higher grades indicate worse outcomes.
Two complementary CNB metrics are calculated:
Higher values of both metrics indicate worse outcomes. Between-arm comparisons will use mixed-effects models adjusted for stratification factors.
Time frame: From randomization up to the end of treatment (approximately 24 months), assessed at baseline and at protocol-specified time points.
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), a 30-item validated cancer- specific questionnaire comprising 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain), 6 single-item symptom assessments, and a global health status/quality of life scale. All scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. For functional scales and the global health status/QoL scale, higher scores indicate better functioning or better quality of life (better outcomes). For symptom scales and single items, higher scores indicate a higher level of symptom burden (worse outcomes). Mean changes from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale scores will be compared between treatment arms using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM), adjusted for stratification factors.
Time frame: From randomization up to the end of treatment (approximately 24 months), assessed at baseline and at protocol-specified time points.
Patient-reported peripheral neuropathy symptoms are assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20-item module (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20), a validated 20-item instrument designed to specifically capture sensory, motor, and autonomic symptoms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = "Not at all" to 4 = "Very much"). Raw scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate a higher level of peripheral neuropathy symptom burden (worse outcomes).
Mean changes from baseline in EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 sensory, motor, and autonomic subscale scores will be compared between treatment arms using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM), adjusted for stratification factors.
Time frame: From randomization up to the end of treatment (approximately 24 months).
The proportion of participants who achieve a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) based on RECIST v1.1.
Time frame: From randomization up to the end of treatment (approximately 24 months).
The proportion of participants with CR, PR, or Stable Disease (SD) maintained for at least 6 weeks.
Time frame: From randomization up to the end of treatment (approximately 24 months).
The time from randomization to the first disease progression (per RECIST v1.1) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: From randomization up to the end of treatment (approximately 24 months).
The time from randomization to death from any cause.
Time frame: From randomization up to the end of treatment (approximately 24 months).
The time from the first documented CR or PR until the first documented disease progression or death.
Time frame: From randomization up to the end of treatment (approximately 24 months).
Assessment of AEs graded by NCI-CTCAE v5.0 including incidence, type, severity, duration, and relationship to study drug.
Time frame: Baseline, and at protocol-specified time points during treatment (including the time of first occurrence of Grade ≥2 neurotoxicity symptoms), up to approximately 24 months.
Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is a blood-based biomarker of neuronal axonal injury. Elevated sNfL levels reflect ongoing axonal damage and have been validated as a biomarker for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and other neurodegenerative conditions.
sNfL concentration is measured in serum using a quantitative single-molecule array (Simoa) immunoassay. Results are reported in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). Higher sNfL levels indicate greater axonal injury (worse neurological outcomes).
Outcomes assessed include: (1) absolute sNfL concentration at each time point, (2) change from baseline in sNfL concentration, and (3) fold change in sNfL from baseline. Between-arm comparisons will be performed using mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) on log-transformed values.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Shanshan Wang
CONTACT
Yao Zhu
CONTACT
Fudan University
Other
A Randomized, Open-label, Phase II Study Evaluating the Neurotoxicity and Efficacy of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (Sac-TMT) Versus MMAE-based ADCs in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: The SPARE-UC-01 Trial
Acronym: SPARE-UC-01
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07492628
Bladder Cancer, Carcinoma
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05544552
Advanced Solid Tumor, Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04200963
Advanced Cancer, Advanced Solid Tumor
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06469229
Bladder Cancer, Carcinoma
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial Details