Cetuximab
BiologicalGiven IV
Other names: Chimeric Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibody, Chimeric MoAb C225, Chimeric Monoclonal Antibody C225, Erbitux, IMC-C225
NCT Number: NCT03365882
This randomized phase II trial studies how well trastuzumab and pertuzumab work compared to cetuximab and irinotecan hydrochloride in treating patients with HER2/neu amplified colorectal cancer that has spread from where it started to other places in the body and cannot be removed by surgery. Monoclonal antibodies, such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab, may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cetuximab and irinotecan hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving trastuzumab and pertuzumab may work better compared to cetuximab and irinotecan hydrochloride in treating patients with colorectal cancer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Advance Oncology Center, Aguadilla, Puerto Rico
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the efficacy of trastuzumab and pertuzumab (TP) (Arm 1) in HER-2 amplified metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) by comparing progression-free survival (PFS) on TP compared to control arm (Arm 2) of cetuximab and irinotecan hydrochloride (irinotecan) (CETIRI).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the overall response rate (ORR), including confirmed complete and partial response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, in treatment Arms 1 and 2.
II. To evaluate the overall survival (OS) in treatment Arms 1 and 2. III. To evaluate the safety and toxicity of TP compared to CETIRI.
TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To estimate the rates of PFS, OS, and ORR in patients who crossover to TP (Arm 3) after disease progression on CETIRI.
II. To bank images for future retrospective analysis. III. To evaluate if HER-2/centromeric probe (CEP17) signal ratio and HER-2 gene copy number (GCN) are predictive of clinical efficacy for patients receiving TP versus CETIRI.
IV. To bank tissue and blood samples for other future correlative studies from patients enrolled on the study.
OUTLINE: Patients with HER2 gene amplification are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients receive pertuzumab intravenously (IV) over 30-60 minutes and trastuzumab IV over 30-120 minutes on day 1. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM II: Patients receive cetuximab IV over 60-120 minutes and irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 90 minutes on day 1. Courses repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with documented disease progression may optionally crossover to Arm I.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 3 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Given IV
Other names: Chimeric Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibody, Chimeric MoAb C225, Chimeric Monoclonal Antibody C225, Erbitux, IMC-C225
Given IV
Other names: Campto, Camptosar, Camptothecin 11, Camptothecin-11, CPT 11, CPT-11, Irinomedac, U-101440E
Correlative studies
Given IV
Other names: 2C4, 2C4 Antibody, MoAb 2C4, Monoclonal Antibody 2C4, Perjeta, rhuMAb2C4, RO4368451
Given IV
Other names: ABP 980, Anti-c-ERB-2, Anti-c-erbB2 Monoclonal Antibody, Anti-ERB-2, Anti-erbB-2, Anti-erbB2 Monoclonal Antibody, Anti-HER2/c-erbB2 Monoclonal Antibody, Anti-p185-HER2, c-erb-2 Monoclonal Antibody, HER2 Monoclonal Antibody, Herceptin, Herceptin Biosimilar PF-05280014, Herceptin Trastuzumab Biosimilar PF-05280014, MoAb HER2, Monoclonal Antibody c-erb-2, Monoclonal Antibody HER2, PF-05280014, rhuMAb HER2, RO0452317, Trastuzumab Biosimilar ABP 980, Trastuzumab Biosimilar PF-05280014
Central testing of HER-2 for eligibility
Time frame: Up to 3 years post randomization
To evaluate the efficacy of trastuzumab and pertuzumab (TP) in HER-2 amplified metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) by comparing progression-free survival (PFS) on TP compared to control arm of cetuximab and irinotecan (CETIRI). Progression-free survival is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of progression. Using RECIST 1.1, progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of appropriate diameters of target measurable lesions over smallest sum observed and an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm, unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease in the opinion of the treating physician, appearance of any new lesion/site, death due to disease without prior documentation of progression and without symptomatic deterioration (defined as, global deterioration of health status requiring discontinuation of treatment without objective evidence of progression), or death due to any cause.
Time frame: From baseline, through duration of treatment (once per cycle while on treatment), and every 8 weeks after treatment until progression, up to 3 years after the last accrual to registration step 2
To evaluate the overall response rate (ORR), including confirmed complete and partial response per RECIST 1.1, in the TP and CETIRI treatment arms. Overall response rate includes complete response(CR) and partial response(PR). Complete response is defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no related symptoms. Partial response is defined as a greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of appropriate diameters of all target measurable lesions for patients with at least one measurable lesion.
Time frame: from the date of the last accrual to registration step 2 to date of death due to any cause, up to 2 years
Percentage of participants still alive 2 years after the last accrual to registration step 2. Overall survival is defined as time from date of registration to date of death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive are censored at their last contact date.
Time frame: Duration of treatment and follow-up until death or 3 years post Step 2 Randomization.
Routine toxicities were evaluated according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0, and SAEs were evaluated according to CTCAE version 5.0. Only adverse events that are possibly, probably, or definitely related to study drug are reported.
SWOG Cancer Research Network
Network
S1613, A Randomized Phase II Study of Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab (TP) Compared to Cetuximab and Irinotecan (CETIRI) in Advanced/Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) With HER-2 Amplification
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02393755
Colon Adenocarcinoma, Colonic Diseases
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00096278
Colon Adenocarcinoma, Colonic Diseases
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05746195
Colon Adenocarcinoma, Colonic Diseases
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02368886
Colon Adenocarcinoma, Colonic Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details