Afatinib Dimaleate
DrugGiven PO
Other names: (2E)-N-(4-((3-Chloro-4-fluorophenyl)amino)-7-(((3S)-tetrahydrofuran-3-yl)oxy)quinazolin- 6-yl)-4-(dimethylamino)but-2-enamide bis(hydrogen (2Z)-but-2-enedioate), BIBW 2992MA2, BIBW2992 MA2, Gilotrif
NCT Number: NCT02438722
This randomized phase II/III trial studies how well afatinib dimaleate with cetuximab works and compares it with afatinib dimaleate alone in treating patients with newly diagnosed stage IV or recurrent (has come back), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer. Afatinib dimaleate may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, may block tumor growth in different ways by targeting certain cells. It is not yet known whether afatinib dimaleate is more effective when given alone or with cetuximab in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Mercy Hospital Fort Smith, Fort Smith, Arkansas, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate if there is sufficient evidence to continue to the phase III component by comparing progression-free survival (PFS) between patients randomized to afatinib (afatinib dimaleate) in combination with cetuximab versus afatinib alone in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). (Phase II) II. To determine the efficacy of the combination of afatinib and cetuximab compared to afatinib alone as measured by overall survival (OS) in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. (Phase III)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the overall response rate (confirmed and unconfirmed, complete and partial responses) in the subset of patients with measurable disease treated with afatinib plus cetuximab compared to afatinib alone.
II. To assess the safety of each treatment arm when used in the first-line setting.
III. To compare time to treatment failure and time to treatment discontinuation between randomized to afatinib in combination with cetuximab versus afatinib alone.
TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To investigate the molecular mechanisms that confer benefit from afatinib and afatinib plus cetuximab by evaluating whether the presence of de novo EGFR T790M mutation or other molecular alterations in the pre-treatment tumor influence the clinical outcomes.
II. To quantitatively assess whether the ratio of sensitizing EGFR (EGFRs) mutation to EGFR T790M influences outcome and is altered during treatment.
III. To evaluate the frequency of known mechanisms of resistance to EGFR-directed therapies in the context of afatinib plus cetuximab and afatinib alone treatment.
IV. To identify potential novel predictors of benefit to afatinib plus cetuximab.
V. To identify potential new mechanisms of resistance to EGFR-directed therapies.
VI. To establish patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) from a subset of patients by re-biopsy at the time of progressive disease for drug testing and genomic analysis.
VII. To assess whether circulating tumor markers can be used as indicators of sensitivity and resistance to afatinib plus cetuximab and afatinib alone.
VIII. To determine whether the levels of EGFR protein by immunohistochemistry predict for benefit to afatinib plus cetuximab and afatinib alone.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients receive afatinib dimaleate orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-28 and cetuximab intravenously (IV) over 2 hours on days 1 and 15. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM II: Patients receive afatinib dimaleate as in Arm I. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 3 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Given PO
Other names: (2E)-N-(4-((3-Chloro-4-fluorophenyl)amino)-7-(((3S)-tetrahydrofuran-3-yl)oxy)quinazolin- 6-yl)-4-(dimethylamino)but-2-enamide bis(hydrogen (2Z)-but-2-enedioate), BIBW 2992MA2, BIBW2992 MA2, Gilotrif
Given IV
Other names: Chimeric Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibody, Chimeric MoAb C225, Chimeric Monoclonal Antibody C225, Erbitux, IMC-C225
Correlative studies
Time frame: Up to 3 years post registration
Percentage of participants still alive 2 years post registration.
KM estimate at 2 years is presented, Overall Survival assessed for a total of 3 years in order to calculate value.
Time frame: up to 3 years post registration
From date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration or death due to any cause.
Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of appropriate diameters of target measurable lesions over smallest sum observed, as well as an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease in the opinion of treating physician. Appearance of any new lesion/site. Death due to disease without prior documentation of progression and without symptomatic deterioration.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Percentage of participants with confirmed and unconfirmed, partial response and complete response to treatment Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST 1.1).
Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of appropriate diameters of all target measurable lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Time frame: up to 3 years post-registration
From date of registration to date of discontinuation of treatment or death due to any cause
Time frame: assessed up to 3 years post registration
From date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, early discontinuation of treatment, or death due to any cause.
Time frame: Duration of treatment and follow up until death or 3 years post registration
Routine Adverse Events are reported by CTCAE4.0. For serious adverse event reporting, we updated from CTCAE4.0 to CTCAE5.0. . Only adverse events that are possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug are reported.
Time frame: Baseline up to 3 years (after disease progression)
For each of these markers, a one-sample t-test (or Wilcoxon signed-rank test) will be used to test the null hypothesis that the absolute difference between the copy number after progression and the copy number in the pre-treatment specimen (or an appropriate transformation of the difference, determined after exploratory data analysis) is not equal to zero.
Time frame: Baseline up to 3 years (at progression)
To evaluate if EGFRs/EGFR T790M is lower at progression than in pre-treatment specimens among patients with results available for pre-treatment and progression, a one-sample t-test (or Wilcoxon signed-rank test) will be used to test the null hypothesis that the difference between the progression ratio and the pre-treatment ratio (or an appropriate transformation of the difference, determined after exploratory data analysis) is greater than zero in favor of the alternative that the difference is less than zero.
Time frame: Baseline
To evaluate the hypothesis that H-score positive status at baseline is associated with absolute difference in PFS (and OS) among patients randomized to receive afatinib dimaleate monotherapy a test of interaction will be performed at the 1-sided 20% level.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Tumor marker levels over time will be evaluated using a linear mixed model for continuous markers and using generalized estimating equations for binary markers. A landmark analysis will be used to evaluate the correlation between post-randomization biomarker values and PFS and OS (from the landmark timepoint) using a Cox proportional hazards model.
Time frame: Baseline
To evaluate if the presence of de novo T790M mutation is associated with primary resistance to afatinib dimaleate, PFS and OS will be compared between T790M mutation positive and negative patients randomized to the afatinib dimaleate monotherapy arm using a log-rank test..
Time frame: Up to 3 years
To evaluate if the ratio of EGFR sensitizing mutation to EGFR T790M mutation (EGFRs/EGFR T790M) among patients with T790M is predictive for afatinib dimaleate monotherapy, analyses will be performed in a similar fashion to the evaluation of T790M among patients with measurable T790M (which defines T790M). Cox regression will be used to assess the predictive association of the ratio in the afatinib dimaleate monotherapy arm with both OS and PFS
SWOG Cancer Research Network
Network
A Randomized Phase II/III Trial of Afatinib Plus Cetuximab Versus Afatinib Alone in Treatment-Naive Patients With Advanced, EGFR Mutation Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02206334
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02823990
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03049618
ALK Gene Mutation, BRAF Gene Mutation
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01737502
Adenocarcinoma, Adenocarcinoma of Lung
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details