Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05787860

Ruxolitinib in Seborrheic Dermatitis

This study is an open-label prospective interventional trial that will assess the efficacy of ruxolitinib in the treatment of seborrheic dermatitis. It will also attempt to characterize the molecular immune profiles of patients with SD at week 0 and week 4, with comparison to baseline profiles in healthy control subjects.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

New York, 10029, United States

About this study

The study will include 25 adult patients with moderate-to-severe-SD as well as 20 age- and gender-matched healthy control subjects for comparison. The SD patients will have baseline clinical score of at least 6 using the SD Severity Score in Appendix 1, or an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of at least 3. Enrolled SD subjects will apply topical ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily for 4 weeks. They will return for visits at weeks 2, 4, and 6 following study treatment initiation for repeat clinical assessments, medication reviews, tape-strip, blood and urine sample collections, and monitoring for adverse events.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

For SD Subjects:

  • Male or female subjects ≥ 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent document.
  • Subject is able to understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent document prior to participation in any study assessments or procedures.
  • Subject is able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
  • Baseline SD score of IGA ≥ 3 with facial involvement
  • Subject agrees to discontinue all treatments for SD from screening through study completion aside from the study drug
  • Subject has failed an adequate course of treatment with at least one available therapy (topical antifungals or low-potency topical corticosteroids)
  • Subject is judged to be in otherwise good overall health as judged by the investigator, based on medical history, physical examination, and laboratory testing. (NOTE: The definition of good health means a subject does not have uncontrolled significant co-morbid conditions).
  • Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening and Baseline. While on the study drug and for at least 90 days after the last application of the study drug, male and female participants must be willing to take appropriate contraceptive measures to avoid pregnancy or fathering a child. FCBP who engage in activity in which conception is possible must use one of the approved contraceptive options described below:
  • Option 1: Any one of the following highly effective contraceptive methods: hormonal contraception (oral, injection, implant, transdermal patch, vaginal ring); intrauterine device (IUD); tubal ligation; or partner's vasectomy, OR:
  • Option 2: Male or female condom (latex condom or nonlatex condom NOT made out of natural [animal] membrane [for example, polyurethane]); PLUS one additional barrier method: (a) diaphragm with spermicide; (b) cervical cap with spermicide; or (c) contraceptive sponge with spermicide.

The female subject's chosen form of contraception must be effective by the time the female subject is enrolled into the study.

Inclusion criteria

For Control Subjects:

  • Male or female subjects ≥ 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent document.
  • Subject is able to understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent document prior to participation in any study assessments or procedures.
  • Subject does not currently have and does not have a history of SD.
  • Female of childbearing potential (FCBP) must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening and Baseline

Exclusion criteria

For SD Subjects:

The presence of any of the following will exclude a subject from enrollment:

  • SD clinical severity of IGA <3 and SD Severity Score <6.
  • Subjects with other skin diseases that would interfere with the study assessment in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Active bacterial, fungal, or viral skin infection within 2 weeks from study initiation.
  • Subject has clinically significant (as determined by the investigator) renal, hepatic, hematologic, intestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiovascular, neurological, psychiatric, immunologic, or other major uncontrolled diseases (e.g., malignancy, TB, HIV, HBV, HCV, thromboembolic events) that will affect the health of the subject during the study, or interfere with the interpretation of study results.
  • Subject has previously received treatment with oral or topical JAK inhibitors
  • Current other topical treatments (e.g., topical corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors) within 1 week of baseline
  • Use of systemic immunosuppressive medications, including, but not limited to, cyclosporine, systemic or intralesional corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, methotrexate, tacrolimus within 4 weeks of study initiation
  • Concurrent use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors within 7 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer). A list of CYP3A4 inhibiting medications can be found in Appendix 3.
  • History of adverse systemic or allergic reactions to any component of the study drug.
  • Current participation in any other study with an investigational medication
  • Subject who is pregnant or breast feeding

Exclusion criteria

For Control Subjects:

  • Active bacterial, fungal, or viral skin infection within 2 weeks from Screening/Baseline visit.
  • Subject has uncontrolled clinically significant (as determined by the investigator) renal, hepatic, hematologic, intestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiovascular, neurological, psychiatric, immunologic, or other disease.
  • Subject has previously received treatment with oral or topical JAK inhibitors
  • Current other topical treatments (e.g., topical corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors) within 1 week of baseline
  • Use of systemic immunosuppressive medications, including, but not limited to, cyclosporine, systemic or intralesional corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, methotrexate, tacrolimus within 4 weeks of study initiation
  • Current participation in any other study with an investigational medication
  • Subject who is pregnant or breast feeding

Treatment and study plan

Ruxolitinib 1.5% cream

Drug

topical ruxolitinib 1.5% cream twice daily for 4 weeks

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Investigator Global Assessment of 0 or 1 at Week 4

    Time frame: At end of Treatment, Week 4

    Number of Participants with Investigator Global Assessment of 0 or 1 at Week 4

    IGA Scale from 0-4

    Clear 0 No signs of SD

    Almost Clear 1 Just perceptible erythema and just perceptible scaling

    Mild 2 Mild erythema and mild scaling

    Moderate 3 Moderate erythema and moderate scaling

    Severe 4 Severe erythema and severe scaling

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Investigator Global Assessment From Baseline to Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

    IGA Scale from 0-4

    Clear 0 No signs of SD

    Almost Clear 1 Just perceptible erythema and just perceptible scaling

    Mild 2 Mild erythema and mild scaling

    Moderate 3 Moderate erythema and moderate scaling

    Severe 4 Severe erythema and severe scaling

  2. Mean Change in Seborrheic Dermatitis Severity Score

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 6

    Mean Change in seborrheic dermatitis severity score from baseline and week 4, baseline a d week 6 and week 4 and week 6

    SD Severity Score (the sum of the three clinical features for a total score ranging from 0-12), where higher scores indicate more severe outcomes.

    Scale 0-4 Erythema 0-4 Pruritus 0-4 (0 = absence, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = significant, 4 = severe)

  3. Mean Change in Seborrheic Dermatitis Severity Score for Scale

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 6

    Mean Change in seborrheic dermatitis severity score for Scale from baseline and week 4, baseline and week 6, week 4 and week 6

    Scale 0-4, where higher scores indicate more severe outcomes.

    (0 = absence, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = significant, 4 = severe)

  4. Change in Seborrheic Dermatitis Severity Score for Erythema

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 6

    Change in seborrheic dermatitis severity score for Erythema from baseline and week 4, baseline and week 6, week 4 and week 6

    Erythema 0-4, where higher scores indicate more severe outcomes.

    (0 = absence, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = significant, 4 = severe)

  5. Change in Seborrheic Dermatitis Severity Score for Pruritus

    Time frame: Baseline Week 4, and Week 6

    Change in seborrheic dermatitis severity score for Pruritus from baseline and week 4, baseline and week 6, week 4 and week 6

    Pruritus 0-4, where higher scores indicate more severe outcomes.

    (0 = absence, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = significant, 4 = severe)

  6. Frequency of Adverse Events

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  7. Duration of Adverse Events

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  8. Severity of Adverse Events

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Severity will be measured as a category (mild, moderate, or severe).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Other

Collaborators

  • Incyte Corporation

Registry information

Official study title

Characterizing the Molecular Cutaneous Phenotype of Seborrheic Dermatitis and Treatment Response to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Mar 28, 2023
Registry last updated
May 6, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.