Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02514330

Running Slopes and Power Performance

The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of interval session running at high intensity with 1% or 10% gradient on the height of the drop jump. The cinematic variables concentric phase, eccentric and contact time were compared after the running session in both conditions in order to explain possible changes in the jump performance. The investigators theorize that the lower eccentric overload in the running to 10% inclination promotes higher deleterious effect on power performance of the lower limbs

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Physical training programs are typically composed of activities directed to the development of different valences usually stimulated in the same session. When aerobic activities of long duration prior isokinetic strength exercises, isotonic, or explosive, deleterious effects seem to be induced on performance of these valences. These short and long-term changes in muscle strength and power would be directly associated with repetitive eccentric loads that characterize the endurance running. Gradual increases in the running slope were inversely associated with a proportional reduction in the eccentric loads, which in turn would result in less muscle damage to intra and extrafusal fibers. So, the change in the slope of the race would emerge as an optional way to neutralize the competitive effect on the power performance. The research consisted of five visits. At the initial visit was conducted familiarization to vertical drop jump, and immediately after, the determination of VO2max values and their associated speed (vVO2max). The second visit was a new familiarization for the vertical drop jump followed immediately determining the Time to exhaustion performance in vVO2max (100% of VO2Max). Two jumps were performed on each of the three selected heights (20, 30 and 40 cm) were used in the experimental sessions and control only the height associated with the highest performance. In subsequent visits (third to fifth), participants performed three maximum jumps before and about 10 min after the following conditions: high intensity Interval running a 10% gradient (C10%), 1% grade (C1%) and control condition (CON).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • age: 18 at 45 years
  • no cardiovascular or metabolic problems
  • minimum level of aerobic activity recommended by American College of Sports Medicine

Exclusion criteria

  • no joint or muscle injuries
  • no use ergogenic or anabolic resources

Treatment and study plan

Interval Training at 1% incline

Other

Six stimuli were performed to exhaustion. The vertical drop jump strategy (height and kinematics) served to establish the magnitude of the concurrent effect

Other names: HIIT at 1%, High Intensity Interval Training at 1%

Interval Training at 10% incline

Other

Six stimuli were performed to exhaustion. The vertical drop jump strategy (height and kinematics) served to establish the magnitude of the concurrent effect.

Other names: HIIT at 10%, High Intensity Interval Training at 10%

Primary outcomes

  1. Kinematic of Height Jump

    Time frame: up to 1 month

    the same group (N=25) of subjects performed the experimental procedure in the last three sessions aiming to achieve the highest performance in all three conditions

Secondary outcomes

  1. Kinematic of Concentric Phase

    Time frame: up to 1 month

    the same group of subjects performed the experimental procedure in the last three sessions

  2. Kinematic of Excentric Phase

    Time frame: up to 1 month

    the same group of subjects performed the experimental procedure in the last three sessions

  3. Kinematic of Contact Time

    Time frame: up to 1 month

    the same group of subjects performed the experimental procedure in the last three sessions

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Concurrent Effect of Running in Different Slopes on Power Performance

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Aug 3, 2015
Registry last updated
Aug 3, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.