Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04383249

Routine Pathological Examination of Hernia Sac; Is it a Workload or Necessary?

Routine microscopic examination of the hernia sac is controversial. While some centers do not recommend a routine microscopic examination in inguinal hernias in adult patients, they recommend them in abdominal wall hernias. The investigators aimed to discuss the pathology results and unexpected histopathological findings who underwent abdominal wall and inguinal hernia operation in the light of the literature.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Dr. Ersin Arslan Training and Resource Hospital

Gaziantep, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

The hernia is defined as the passage of an organ or tissue from one anatomical region to another. Hernia sacs are sent to the pathology department, although there is a difference between clinics. Routine microscopic examination of the hernia sac is controversial. While some centers do not recommend a routine microscopic examination in inguinal hernias in adult patients, they recommend them in abdominal wall hernias. Here, the investigators aimed to discuss the pathology results and unexpected histopathological findings who underwent abdominal wall and inguinal hernia operation in the light of the literature. Patients who have operated hernia and sent hernia sac for histopathological examination were retrospectively screened. Emergency and elective operated patients were included. Hernia repairs without pathology were excluded from the study. Patients' gender, age, operation notes, and pathology results were analyzed. Pathology results were analyzed in two groups as expected findings and unexpected findings. In our study, the probability of encountering an unexpected pathological result was found to be quite low in the pathological evaluation of the hernia sac. Although it may cause additional workload and cost, all hernia sacs should be sent to routine pathological examination. The investigators believe that making savings in these areas through further investigation after the decision of the pathologist.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Emergency operated patients
  • Elective operated patients

Exclusion criteria

  • Hernia repairs without pathology examinations

Treatment and study plan

Pathology result

Diagnostic Test

Pathology result of the hernia sac

Primary outcomes

  1. unexpected finding

    Time frame: 2 or 3 week

    rate of unexpected result

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Dr. Ersin Arslan Education and Training Hospital

Other Gov

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
May 12, 2020
Registry last updated
May 12, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.