Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00896532

Romosozumab (AMG 785) in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density

The primary objective was to determine the effect of treatment with romosozumab versus placebo at month 12 on the percent change from baseline in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine in postmenopausal women with low bone density.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

This study included a 24-month treatment phase followed by rerandomization to a 12-month extension phase with denosumab or placebo, followed by a 12-month retreatment phase with romosozumab, followed by a 24-month follow-on phase with zoledronic acid or no intervention.

  • 24-month Romosozumab Treatment Phase (months 1 to 24): Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio to receive 1 of 5 double-blind dosing regimens of romosozumab or placebo or open-label alendronate (ALN) or open-label teriparatide (TPTD) for the first 12 months of the study. At month 12, participants in the romosozumab and placebo groups continued their assigned treatment for an additional 12 months, participants in the TPTD group ended study participation, and participants in the ALN group transitioned to receive romosozumab 140 mg subcutaneously (SC) every month (QM) for an additional 12 months (months 12 to 24).
  • 12-month Denosumab Extension Phase (months 24 to 36): At the end of the 24-month romosozumab treatment phase, eligible participants were randomized 1:1 within their original treatment group to receive either denosumab or placebo every 6 months (Q6M) for 12 months.
  • 12-month Romosozumab Retreatment Phase (months 36 to 48): From months 36 to 48, participants initially randomized to romosozumab or placebo received romosozumab 210 mg SC QM. Participants who initially received ALN ended their participation at month 36 and were not retreated with romosozumab.
  • 24-month Follow-on Phase (months 48 to 72): At month 48, participants received 1 dose of zoledronic acid 5 mg intravenously or no intervention for an additional 24 months.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ambulatory, postmenopausal women, aged ≥ 55 to ≤ 85
  • Low BMD measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and assessed by the central imaging vendor (equivalent to T-scores between -2.0 and -3.5)

Exclusion criteria

  • History of vertebral fracture, or fragility fracture of the wrist, humerus, hip or pelvis after age 50
  • Untreated hyper- or hypothyroidism
  • Current hyper- or hypoparathyroidism, hypo- or hypercalcemia
  • Elevated transaminases
  • Significantly impaired renal function
  • Positive for: human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis-C or hepatitis-B surface antigen
  • Malignancy
  • History of solid organ or bone marrow transplants
  • Use of agents affecting bone metabolism
  • Contraindicated or intolerant of alendronate therapy
  • Contraindicated or intolerant of teriparatide therapy

Inclusion criteria

for the 12 month extension phase (Month 24 to 36):

  • Normocalcemia at or after the Month 21 visit but before the Month 24 study visit

Exclusion criteria

for the 12 month extension phase (Month 24 to 36)

  • Incidence of a clinical vertebral fracture or fragility fracture of the wrist, humerus, hip or pelvis during the initial 24 month treatment phase of the study
  • A BMD loss of ≥ 7.0% from baseline at any time up to the Month 18 visit of the initial 24-month treatment phase
  • Malignancy
  • History of osteonecrosis of the jaw
  • Use of proscribed medication during the initial 24 month treatment phase
  • Contraindicated or intolerant of denosumab therapy

Inclusion criteria

for the 12 month re-treatment phase (Month 36 to 48)

  • Albumin adjusted serum calcium of the most recent blood draw at or after the Month 30 visit but before the Month 36 study visit. Calcium repletion is permitted and central laboratory analysis of albumin adjusted serum calcium may be repeated before the Month 36 study visit
  • Participation in Group A or B during initial 24 month treatment phase
  • Subject has reached M36 of the study
  • Appropriate written informed consent must be obtained

Exclusion criteria

for the 12 month re-treatment phase (Month 36 to 48)

  • New malignancy
  • Use of proscribed medication during the 12 month extension phase

Inclusion criteria

for the 24 month follow-on phase (Month 48 to 72) General inclusion criteria for participation

  • Subject has reached month 48 of the study
  • Appropriate written informed consent must be obtained Inclusion criteria for assignment to the no intervention group
  • During the 24 month AMG 785 treatment phase, subject was assigned to any AMG 785 treatment group
  • During the 12 month denosumab extension phase, subject was assigned to the denosumab treatment group Exclusion for the 24 month follow-on phase (Month 48 to 72)
  • New malignancy
  • Use of proscribed meds during the 12 month re-treatment phase
  • Partial informed consent withdrawal and discontinuation of investigational product at any time up to month 48 visit
  • Incidence of a clinical vertebral fracture or fragility fracture of the wrist, humerus, hip or pelvis during the initial 24 month treatment phase of the study
  • BMD T-score of ≤ -2.5 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck based on local read of the DXA scans at month 48
  • Intolerance to zoledronic acid

Treatment and study plan

Placebo to Romosozumab

Drug

Administered by subcutaneous injection QM or Q3M.

Alendronate

Drug

Administered orally once a week

Other names: Fosamax

Teriparatide

Drug

Teriparatide 20 μg administered by subcutaneous injection once a day

Other names: Forsteo

Romosozumab

Drug

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Other names: AMG 785, EVENITY™

Denosumab

Drug

Denosumab 60 mg administered by subcutaneous injection Q6M

Other names: Prolia®

Placebo to Denosumab

Drug

Administered by subcutaneous injection Q6M

Zoledronic acid

Drug

Zoledronic acid 5 mg administered intravenously

Other names: Aclasta

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD at the Lumbar Spine

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent Change From Baseline at Month 6 in BMD at the Lumbar Spine

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

    Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.

    Percent change from baseline to month 6 was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the percent change from baseline to month 6 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, and baseline BMD value, machine type, geographic region, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, visit, treatment (categorical) and interaction of treatment and visit as the independent variables.

  2. Percent Change From Baseline at Month 6 in BMD of the Total Hip

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

    Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.

    Percent change from baseline to month 6 was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the percent change from baseline to month 6 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, and baseline BMD value, machine type, geographic region, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, visit, treatment (categorical) and interaction of treatment and visit as the independent variables.

  3. Percent Change From Baseline at Month 6 in BMD of the Femoral Neck

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

    Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.

    Percent change from baseline to month 6 was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the percent change from baseline to month 6 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, and baseline BMD value, machine type, geographic region, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, visit, treatment (categorical) and interaction of treatment and visit as the independent variables.

  4. Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD of the Total Hip

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.

    Percent change from baseline to 12 months in BMD was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the percent change from baseline to month 12 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, and baseline BMD value, machine type, geographic region, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, visit, treatment (categorical) and interaction of treatment and visit as the independent variables.

  5. Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD of the Femoral Neck

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.

    Percent change from baseline to 12 months in BMD was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the percent change from baseline to month 12 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, and baseline BMD value, machine type, geographic region, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, visit, treatment (categorical) and interaction of treatment and visit as the independent variables.

  6. Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD of the Distal Radius

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.

    Percent change from baseline in distal radius BMD was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the percent change from baseline to Month 12 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, baseline BMD value, machine type, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, treatment (categorical) and geographic region as the independent class variables.

  7. Percent Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type 1 N-telopeptide (P1NP)

    Time frame: Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12

    Percent change from baseline in the bone turnover marker (BTM) P1NP was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the natural logarithm of the ratio of BTM (follow-up versus baseline) as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment (categorical), interaction of treatment and visit and the natural logarithm of the baseline BTM as the independent variables; outcomes were then transformed back to percent change from baseline.

  8. Percent Change From Baseline in Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX)

    Time frame: Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12

    Percent change from baseline in the bone turnover marker (BTM) CTX was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the natural logarithm of the ratio of BTM (follow-up versus baseline) as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment (categorical), interaction of treatment and visit and the natural logarithm of the baseline BTM as the independent variables; outcomes were then transformed back to percent change from baseline.

  9. Percent Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin

    Time frame: Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12

    Percent change from baseline in the bone turnover marker (BTM) osteocalcin was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the natural logarithm of the ratio of BTM (follow-up versus baseline) as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment (categorical), interaction of treatment and visit and the natural logarithm of the baseline BTM as the independent variables; outcomes were then transformed back to percent change from baseline.

  10. Percent Change From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)

    Time frame: Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12

    Percent change from baseline in the bone turnover marker (BTM) BSAP was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the natural logarithm of the ratio of BTM (follow-up versus baseline) as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment (categorical), interaction of treatment and visit and the natural logarithm of the baseline BTM as the independent variables; outcomes were then transformed back to percent change from baseline.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Amgen

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Multi-dose Phase 2 Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of AMG 785 in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2016
First posted
May 11, 2009
Registry last updated
Sep 22, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.