Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05942092

ROLL Versus Magnetic Seed for Preoperative Localization of Non-palpable Breast Lesion: Comparison Between Techniques.

Nowadays, Breast Conservative Surgery (BCS) is the standard of care for patients affected by early breast lesions. Screening programmes led to an increase of impalpable breast lesion detection rates. These patients are often eligible for BCS and an accurate preoperative localization technique for the detection of the lesion is required in order to guarantee a safe surgical excision.

The primary goal of BCS is to obtain a complete resection of the tumor with disease-free surgical margins. The presence of tumor on surgical margins on postoperative histological examination of the specimen increases the risk of local recurrence and it requires a surgical re-excision. For all these reasons different techniques for localization of occult breast lesions have been developed over time. Since '70s, the wire guided localization (WGL) technique has represented the gold standard technique; however, it has several limitations such as wire migration or fracture and patient's referred discomfort related to wire placement. Other techniques have been proposed such as the ROLL and magnetic seeds.

The ROLL consists of the injection of a radioactive substance into the breast lesion and the localization during surgery is allowed by using a handheld gamma probe. Limitations of this technique are represented by the need of radioactive injection the day before surgery with subsequent longer hospitalizations and the possible spread of the radioactive substance into breast tissue leading to larger resections.

The latest technological evolution is represented by magnetic seeds, small devices deployed into the lesion even up to more than 30 days before surgery and identified with a specific magnetic probe during surgery.

Currently there are several studies of comparison between the WGL and the more modern techniques. All of these data claim the effectiveness of the new "wire-free" methodics ensuring a safe surgical resection with tumor-free margins and, in some cases, a better aesthetic result.

Studies of comparison between the modern techniques are limited. There is no scientific evidence of the superiority of magnetic seeds compared to ROLL.

The aim of this retrospective study is to compare ROLL with magnetic seed to assess their efficacy in the localization of non-palpable breast lesions.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA

Pavia, Lombardy, 27100, Italy

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patients between 18 and 85 years who underwent to breast conservative surgery for non-palpable occult breast lesions;
  • Intraoperative localization of breast lesion with ROLL or magnetic seed;
  • Preoperative diagnosis on histology or cytology of borderline lesion (B3 or C3) or malignant lesion (B4-B5 or C4-C5).

Exclusion criteria

  • B2 or C2 at preoperative needle breast biopsy or fine needle breast aspiration.
  • Breast tumor localization with clip for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Treatment and study plan

breast conserving surgery

Procedure

Breast conserving surgery after lesion's localization with ROLL or magnetic seed

Primary outcomes

  1. Free-surgical margins

    Time frame: 6 months

    Number of surgical procedures in which surgical margins are tumor disease-free ("no ink on tumor" for invasive cancer and margin of 2 mm for in situ-carcinoma).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Excess breast resection

    Time frame: 6 months

    Excess breast resection calculated by the "calculated resection ratio" (CRR=total resection volume/optimal resection volume)

  2. Surgery time

    Time frame: 6 months

    Surgery duration

  3. Hospitalization's days

    Time frame: 6 months

    Number of hospitalization's days

  4. Complications

    Time frame: 6 months

    Complications occurred after biopsy or surgery

  5. Reintervention

    Time frame: 6 months

    Reintervention rates

  6. Follow up

    Time frame: 5 years after enrollment

    5-years follow-up outcomes

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Retrospective Multicentric Clinical Study Comparing Radioguided Occult Lesion Localization (ROLL) and Magnetic Seed in the Intraoperative Localization of Non-palpable Breast Lesions During Breast Conservative Surgery.

Acronym: SEED01

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jul 12, 2023
Registry last updated
Jun 23, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.