Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00539240

Role of Pain Modulation in GERD Patients Who Failed Standard Dose PPI

The purpose of this project is to compare the efficacy (how successful) 1) standard-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (rabeprazole 20 mg once daily) (a medication that completely blocks the stomach from producing acid) plus low dose tricyclic antidepressant (nortriptyline 50mg) (TCA); 2) double-dose PPI (rabeprazole 20 mg twice a day); to 3) standard-dose PPI (rabeprazole 20mg once daily) and placebo (an inactive substance, like a sugar pill) to determine the relative symptom resolution and health-related quality of life in gastroesophageal reflux disease (a disease characterized by a burning sensation (heartburn) behind the breast bone caused by a backflow of stomach contents into the esophagus) (GERD) patients who fail standard-dose PPI and you will be randomly assigned (similar to flipping a coin) to one of the three groups.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2 / Phase 3

Primary location

Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Tucson

Tucson, Arizona, 85723, United States

About this study

Failure of standard dose PPI to control GERD symptoms has been increasingly encountered in clinical practice (both primary care and sub-specialties) and has become one of the most challenging therapeutic dilemmas in GERD management. It has been estimated that up to 30% of the patients receiving PPI once daily will continue to report typical GERD symptoms [1]. Presently, increasing the PPI dose has been the standard of care in these patients [2]. However, success in relieving refractory GERD symptoms with such a therapeutic approach has been extremely limited, resulting in frustration of both the patient as well as the health care provided. Furthermore, patients who fail PPI will continue to seek medical attention and may undergo a variety of invasive or non-invasive tests, and thus consume already limited health care resources. Recent advancement in the understanding of the diverse composition of the different GERD groups as well as symptom generation has led to the recognition of alteration in pain perception as an important contributing factor for PPI failure in some and the presence of non-acid related stimuli in others [3].

This study will clarify for the first time the role of pain modulation in patients who failed standard dose of PPI. The clinical experience with doubling the PPI dose, which is the current standard of care, has been very limited and relatively disappointing. Additionally, this study may identify the group of PPI failure patients that may benefit from doubling the dose of PPI and the group that will benefit more from adding a pain modulator. This study is timely, has never been performed and addresses a prevalent emerging clinical dilemma in GI as well as primary care clinics.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Currently being treated with a PPI, but continue to experience GERD symptoms (such as heartburn) at least 2 times per week.

Exclusion criteria

  • Known allergy or intolerance to TCA
  • History of serious arrhythmia or use of anti-arrhythmics
  • History of seizures
  • Subjects with significant co-morbidity, e.g., cardiovascular, respiratory, urogenital, renal, gastrointestinal, hepatic, hematological, endocrine, neurologic or psychiatric
  • With evidence or history of drug abuse within the past 6 months
  • Erosive esophagitis, esophageal ulceration, peptic stricture, Barrett's esophagus or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus on endoscopy
  • History of esophagogastric surgery
  • Gastric or duodenal lesions (ulcer, tumor, etc.)
  • Women who are pregnant or of childbearing age who are not on contraception
  • Patients who are unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
  • Insulin dependent diabetes

Treatment and study plan

Rabeprazole 20mg, placebo dinner and bedtime

Drug

Breakfast study medication - Rabeprazole 20mg, matching placebo at dinner , Placebo for tricyclic antidepressant at bedtime

Other names: AcipHex

Rabeprazole 20 mg two times, Placebo at bedtime

Drug

Breakfast & Dinner study medication - Rabeprazole, placebo for tricyclic antidepressant at bedtime

Other names: Aciphex

Rabeprazole 20mg,placebo dinner ,Low dose Tricyclic Antidepressant

Drug

Rabeprazole (Breakfast) study medication, dinner placebo medication, tricyclic antidepressant at bedtime

Other names: Nortriptyline and Aciphex

Primary outcomes

  1. Daytime Heartburn, Number of Days in Week Symptoms Intensity Score < 3 (Better)

    Time frame: Symptom control after 6 weeks of treatment

    the number of days with Symptom Intensity Score < 3 (better) for daytime heartburn during week 6 as compared to baseline

  2. Nighttime Heartburn, Number of Days in Week Symptom Activity Score <3 (Better) in Week 6 Compared to Baseline

    Time frame: Symptom control after 6 weeks of treatment

    the number of days with Symptom Intensity Score < 3 (better) for nighttime heartburn during week 6 as compared to baseline

  3. Acid Regurgitation, Number of Days in Week Symptoms Intensity Score < 3 (Better)

    Time frame: Symptom control after 6 weeks of treatment

    the number of days with Symptom Intensity Score < 3 (better) for acid regurgitation during week 6 as compared to baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health Related Quality of Life

    Time frame: end of study

    SF-36 Physical Component Score (higher number better quality of life), is a measure of overall physical quality of life distinct from mental health. The range is 0 - 100. It has been adjusted to US national norms so that a score of 50 corresponds to the national mean.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

US Department of Veterans Affairs

Fed

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2011
First posted
Oct 4, 2007
Registry last updated
Aug 18, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.