Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05898074

Role of Novel RADA16 Hydrogel in Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery

The purpose of this study is to specifically evaluate the effectiveness of PuraGel, a RADA16 polypeptide hydrogel, in expediting post-operative healing and re-mucosalization of the nasoseptal flap harvest site during endoscopic skull base surgery and the impact on patient and sinonasal morbidity.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

About this study

Briefly, multiple agents exist and have been long-studied in endoscopic sinus and septal surgery, which include non-absorbable agents and biodegradable, absorbable synthetic agents including extracellular matrix (ECM) based compounds and synthetic biopolymers. The goal of these agents has often been to reduce sinonasal crusting, postoperative bleeding, and synechia formation. With advancements in postoperative adjuncts, many options now exist for postoperative sinonasal packing including medicated products such as steroid-impregnated stents and chitosan-based absorbable packs.

Lastly, with respect to intra-operative adjuncts designed to foster healing in the postoperative period, PuraGel, a RADA16 polypeptide hydrogel, was identified as an ECM-based solution, which aids in wound healing, adhesion prevention, and hemostasis at the completion of the case. In hydrogel format, this agent forms a synthetic matrix that serves as a scaffold for mucosal healing while serving as a mechanical barrier on tissue surfaces, thereby limiting scarring. To date, there have been no studies evaluating the role of this gel-based compound in the postoperative period in endoscopic skull base surgery.

Thus, amongst all of these agents that have been previously studied to some degree in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery, there has been limited study on their role in endoscopic skull base surgery and utility in reducing sinonasal morbidity in the postoperative setting. Therefore, our goal was to investigate and compare the impact of varying sinonasal agents in the nasal cavity following endoscopic skull base surgery. We hypothesize that the absorbable, ECM-based gel compound (PuraGel) demonstrates an improvement on postoperative healing rate and sinonasal crusting with reduced patient morbidity and improved patient comfort when compared to non-absorbable agents.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is 18 years of age or older
  • Patient is undergoing endoscopic endonasal approach for the management of a skull base tumor or cerebrospinal fluid leak. Nasoseptal Flap must be harvested.
  • Patient is undergoing surgery via bi-nostril approach requiring bilateral surgical dissection of the nasal cavity in approach to the skull base

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient has evidence of radiographic baseline sinus disease consistent with acute or chronic rhinosinusitis (including nasal polyposis, prior septal perforation) on pre-operative CT sinus
  • Patient has had prior sinonasal surgery or has undergone sinonasal radiation treatment
  • Patient has a known coagulation disorder or immune deficiency.

Treatment and study plan

Non-Absorbable Packing (Silastic Splint)

Device

Participant will have silastic splint applied to nasoseptal flap harvest site

PuraGel (RADA16) Hydrogel

Device

Participant will have PuraGel (RADA16) Hydrogel applied to the nasoseptal flap harvest site

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Modified Lund-Kennedy nasal endoscopy score

    Time frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks following surgery.

    Modified Lund-Kennedy nasal endoscopy score to rate mucosal edema, nasal crusting, and scarring. This will be double blinded (video endoscopy will be performed and scoring will be performed by non-operative surgeon, blinded to the intervention group). This scoring will address wound healing, adhesion formations. Scoring will be performed at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks following surgery. The timing of these assessments is based on the routine postoperative follow-up schedule. No additional appointments will be made for the purposes of this study. We will be looking at the change in this score over time.

    Minimum would be 0. Maximum would be 10. Higher score means worse outcome. The un-abbreviated title is Modified Lund-Kennedy nasal endoscopy score.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient-reported pain

    Time frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks following surgery.

    Patient-reported pain visual analog scale during postoperative debridement of the main nasal cavity. Minimum score is 1 (reflecting no pain) and the maximum score is 10 (reflecting extreme amount of pain).

    Minimum would be 0. Maximum would be 10. Higher score means worse outcome. The un-abbreviated title is Patient-reported pain visual analog scale.

  2. subjective QOL score

    Time frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks following surgery.

    Postoperative, subjective QOL score with the validated Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12 (ASK-12) at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks postoperatively.

    Minimum would be 0. Maximum would be 72. Higher score means worse outcome. The un-abbreviated title is Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12.

  3. Endoscopic grading of mucosalization

    Time frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks following surgery.

    Likert scale of mucosalization of the nasal septum graded by blinded reviewer via nasal endoscopy video

    Minimum would be 0. Maximum would be 10. Higher score means worse outcome. The un-abbreviated title is Likert scale of mucosalization.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Satyan Sreenath, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

(317) 944-0457

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Indiana University

Other

Collaborators

  • 3-D Matrix UK Ltd.

Registry information

Official study title

Novel Application of RADA16 Hydrogel in Reducing Sinonasal Morbidity After Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 12, 2023
Registry last updated
Apr 9, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.