PET CT
DeviceEvery patient undergoing a PET CT at the time of diagnosis of muscle invasive bladder cancer from January 2005 to December 2017 in Bordeaux (Institut Bergonié and University Hospital).
NCT Number: NCT04053101
Bladder cancer is the seventh cause of cancer mortality in France. Overall survival is poor, between 45 and 50% at 5 years.
Optimal staging of lymph nodes and metastasis is crucial for treatment decision of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
Guidelines do not recommend FDG-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Computed Tomography (CT), but rather CT for lymph node and metastatic staging, despite its low accuracy. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing PET CT for localized MIBC in two centers, to help define the utility of PET CT in this setting.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
Background:
Bladder cancer is the second most frequent genito-urinary cancer, and the seventh cause of cancer mortality in France. Overall survival is poor, between 45 and 50% at 5 years. Curative treatment of muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma localized to the bladder includes cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by radical cystectomy with lymph nodes dissection. Nonetheless, surgery indications depend on pre-operative staging regarding nodes and metastatic involvement.
Computed Tomography (CT) scan is the reference imaging study for loco-regional and metastatic staging. Lymph node involvement evaluation is based on morphologic criteria only. Its sensitivity lies between 30 and 53% and its specificity between 67 and 91%. Yet, optimal node staging is crucial for therapeutic decision.
FDG-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) CT, using both morphologic and functional criteria, could help for node staging in muscle invasive bladder cancer assessment, especially by detecting infracentimetric involved lymph nodes. Moreover, it could be useful for detecting distant metastasis.
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of the PET CT for lymph node staging and to determine the rate of treatment modification according to PET CT results Methods: Retrospective study based on the medical records of every patient undergoing a PET CT at the time of diagnosis of MIBC from 01/2005 to 12/2017 in Bordeaux (Bergonie Institute and University Hospital). PET CT could have been done before any treatment (PET 1) and/or after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and before surgery (PET 2).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Every patient undergoing a PET CT at the time of diagnosis of muscle invasive bladder cancer from January 2005 to December 2017 in Bordeaux (Institut Bergonié and University Hospital).
Time frame: 16 weeks after inclusion
Performance sensitivity of FDG-PET CT for LN staging on diagnosis of MIBC (before and after NAC and before cystectomy and LN dissection).
Gold standard : pathological results (complete response vs no complete response).
Comparison of PET-CT TNM staging between patients with and patients without a Pathological Complete Response.
Sensitivity rate : count of participants with complete response as per FDG-PET divided by count of participants with pathoplogical complete response
Time frame: Date of pathological results, up to 20 weeks after inclusion
Performance specificity of FDG-PET CT for LN staging on diagnosis of MIBC (before and after NAC and before cystectomy and LN dissection).
Gold standard : pathological results (complete response vs no complete response).
Comparison of PET-CT TNM staging between patients with and patients without a Pathological Complete Response Specificiity rate : count of participants with NO complete response as per FDG-PET divided by count of participants with NO pathoplogical complete response
Institut Bergonié
Other
Acronym: TEP-Vessie
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03773666
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03294304
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03732677
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04960709
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Orange, California, United States
View Trial Details