Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06754592

Role of Dynamic Ultrasound in Assessment of Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic high-resolution ultrasonography in identifying various abnormalities of the shoulder impingement syndrome, especially the subacromial type, and to determine the added value of dynamic ultrasonography compared to static examination of such cases. Furthermore, we will compare these findings to MRI, which we regard as the standard in our cases.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Sohag university hospital

Sohag, Egypt

Location contact

Magdy M Amin, Professor

CONTACT

+201090801900

About this study

Patients with shoulder impingement syndrome often experience pain primarily in the anterior and lateral areas of the acromion, which can radiate to the lateral aspect of the mid-arm. This pain typically worsens at night and when lying on the affected side. Additionally, some patients may experience stiffness and weakness due to the pain.

When assessing a patient with signs of impingement, it is essential to evaluate the condition of the rotator cuff and the extent of any tears. This information allows surgeons to create an effective strategy for ongoing patient management.

Ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are effective tools for diagnosing rotator cuff disorders, especially when it comes to detecting full-thickness rotator cuff tears, due to their high sensitivity. However, their overall sensitivity for identifying partial rotator cuff tears and tendinopathy is lower. Impingement-related conditions, such as bursitis and changes or ruptures in tendons, can be visualized using a linear sonography.

Ultrasound (US) offers several advantages over MRI. One key benefit is that ultrasonography is a dynamic form of imaging, while MRI provides static images. US is also portable, better tolerated by patients, and allows for direct interaction with patients; this enables patients to point to the symptomatic area, which can enhance diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, ultrasound is less time-consuming, more cost-effective, and more readily available in secondary and tertiary care settings compared to MRI.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • male and female patients present with shoulder pain with positive clinical tests suggestive of shoulder impingement syndrome

Exclusion criteria

  • History of shoulder surgery, instability disorders, shoulder girdle fracture, radiation therapy to the shoulder, neoplastic lesions, and congenital anomalies of the shoulder. Patients having contraindications to perform MRI (Patients with electrically, magnetically, or mechanically activated implants, pacemakers, cochlear implants, or any metallic orthopedic implants) and claustrophobic patients).

Treatment and study plan

Ultrasound

Device

evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic high-resolution ultrasonography in identifying various abnormalities of the shoulder impingement syndrome, especially the subacromial type, and to determine the added value of dynamic ultrasonography compared to static examination of such cases. Furthermore, we will compare these findings to MRI

Other names: MRI

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison between Ultrasound findings and Magnetic Resonance Imaging findings in patients with clinical diagnosis of Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

    Time frame: Baseline

    Evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic high-resolution ultrasonography in identifying various abnormalities of the shoulder impingement syndrome and to compare these findings to MRI, which we regard as the standard in our cases

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Mohamed Z Ali

CONTACT

+201001119166

Robier I Ibrahim, Resident

CONTACT

[email protected]

+201112880380

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sohag University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jan 1, 2025
Registry last updated
Jan 1, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.