The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
NCT Number: NCT02991456
The purpose of this phase 2 study is to assess the efficacy and patient satisfaction of oral rolapitant plus ondansetron vs. oral ondansetron monotherapy in malignant glioma (MG) patients receiving standard of care radiation (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) therapy. This is a randomized phase 2 trial of rolapitant plus ondansetron vs. ondansetron monotherapy for the prevention of chemo-radiation induced nausea and vomiting in primary MG subjects receiving RT and concomitant multi-dose TMZ.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
All eligible subjects should receive a planned total dose of 54-60 gray (GY) of radiation and 75 mg/m2 of TMZ daily for a total of six weeks. Patients will be randomized to receive one of two antiemetic treatment sequences: sequence A that involves administration of ondansetron alone for 3 weeks followed by a single dose of rolapitant (day 22) plus daily ondansetron for 3 weeks or sequence B that involves a single dose of rolapitant (day 1) plus daily ondansetron for 3 weeks followed by 3 weeks of daily ondansetron alone. The study has one primary endpoint: complete response (CR) rate. Participation in this study may result in reduced chemo-radiation induced nausea and vomiting, however, risks include the common side effects of rolapitant including decreased appetite, neutropenia, dizziness, dyspepsia, urinary tract infection, stomatitis, and anemia.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
single 180 mg dose by mouth
Other names: Varubi
8 mg by mouth daily
Other names: Zofran
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 2
The Complete Response rate is defined as the proportion of participants with no emetic episode or the use of rescue medication during the first two weeks of radiation therapy and concomitant Temozolomide. The Complete Response rate will be assessed via the modified Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Antiemesis Tool (MAT).
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 2
The Complete Response rate is defined as the proportion of participants with no emetic episode or the use of rescue medication during the first two weeks of radiation therapy and concomitant Temozolomide. The Complete Response rate will be assessed via the modified Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) MAT and nurse notes if MATs are missing.
Time frame: Weeks 1-6
The number of participants who prefer rolapitant plus ondansetron over ondansetron alone, as determined by response to the question with "Which nausea medication regimen was I most satisfied with?"
Time frame: Weeks 1-3
Mean effectiveness scores at week 3 using the 9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) patient satisfaction survey. The effectiveness subscale score was computed from the 3 items corresponding to effectiveness. The resulting effectiveness score is measured from 0-100 with higher scores corresponding to higher effectiveness.
Time frame: Weeks 1-3
Mean convenience scores at week 3 using the 9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) patient satisfaction survey. The convenience subscale score was computed from the 3 items corresponding to convenience. The resulting convenience score is measured from 0-100 with higher scores corresponding to higher convenience.
Time frame: Weeks 1-3
Mean overall satisfaction scores at week 3 using the 9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) patient satisfaction survey. The overall satisfaction subscale score was computed from the 3 items corresponding to overall satisfaction. The resulting overall satisfaction score is measured from 0-100 with higher scores corresponding to higher overall satisfaction.
Time frame: Weeks 4-6
Mean effectiveness scores at week 6 using the 9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) patient satisfaction survey. The effectiveness subscale score was computed by summing the 3 items corresponding to effectiveness. The resulting effectiveness score is measured from 0-100 with higher scores corresponding to higher effectiveness.
Time frame: Weeks 4-6
Mean convenience scores at week 6 using the 9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) patient satisfaction survey. The convenience subscale score was computed from the 3 items corresponding to convenience. The resulting convenience score is measured from 0-100 with higher scores corresponding to higher convenience.
Time frame: Weeks 4-6
Mean overall satisfaction scores at week 6 using the 9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) patient satisfaction survey. The overall satisfaction subscale score was computed from the 3 items corresponding to overall satisfaction. The resulting overall satisfaction score is measured from 0-100 with higher scores corresponding to higher overall satisfaction.
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 2
The cRIN-CR rate is defined as the proportion of participants who did not use rescue medication for nausea. The cRIN-CR rates were assessed via the modified Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Antiemesis Tool (MAT).
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 2
The cRIN-CR rate is defined as the proportion of participants who did not use rescue medication for nausea. The cRIN-CR rates were assessed via the modified Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Antiemesis Tool (MAT) and nurses notes if MATs were missing.
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 2
The cRIV-CR rate is defined as the proportion of participants without use of rescue medication for vomiting. The cRIV-CR rates were assessed via the modified Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Antiemesis Tool (MAT).
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 2
The cRIV-CR rate is defined as the proportion of participants without use of rescue medication for vomiting. The cRIV-CR rates were assessed via the modified Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Antiemesis Tool (MAT) and nurse notes if MATS are missing.
Time frame: Weeks 1-6
The cRIN-CR rate is defined as the proportion of participants who did not use rescue medication for nausea. The cRIN-CR rates were assessed via the modified Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Antiemesis Tool (MAT).
Time frame: Weeks 1-6
The cRIV-CR rate is defined as the proportion of participants without use of rescue medication for vomiting. The cRIV-CR rates were assessed via the modified Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Antiemesis Tool (MAT).
Time frame: Weeks 1-3
Percentage of participants who adhered to ondansetron treatment for more than 21 days during weeks 1-3.
Time frame: Weeks 4-6
Percentage of participants who adhered to ondansetron treatment for more than 21 days during weeks 4-6.
Time frame: 8 weeks
The proportion of participants with grade 3, 4 or 5 adverse events (severe, life-threatening, or fatal) possibly, probably or definitely related to administration of Rolapitant or Ondansetron. Adverse events will be collected from start of treatment through the end of the two-week period following chemoradiation (or until 30 days after the last dose of rolapitant is given in Sequence A). CTCAE version 4 was used to grade adverse events.
Duke University
Other
Phase II Randomized Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Patient Satisfaction, and Compliance of the Oral Combination of Rolapitant (Varubi®) Plus Ondansetron vs. Ondansetron Monotherapy in Malignant Glioma Patients Receiving Radiotherapy (RT) and Concomitant Temozolomide
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01450826
Glioma, Nausea
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05676294
Nausea, Pathologic Processes
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06899217
Abdominal Pain, Digestive System Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07038551
Constipation, Nausea
Toyohashi, Aichi-ken, Japan
View Trial Details