Robotic TruST-Postural Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy

The mFRT measures proactive postural control during maximum reaching distance. It is a valid and reliable tool in CP; and it discriminates GMFCS levels.

The PSST will be performed before and after interventions to monitor sitting control progression in both TruST- and control-intervention groups. The investigators have several motivations that rationalize this customized measurement. It: 1) is age-appropriate, 2) is goal-oriented, 3) directly measures sitting based on trunk control improvements, 4) is responsive to capture sitting workspace area increases, and 5) offers data with a straightforward functional interpretation.

The BBT examines manual dexterity. The child moves the maximum number of blocks (2.5cm2), one at a time, between the compartments of a partitioned box within 60s. B&B is sensitive to post-intervention changes with the more- and less-affected hand. Arm displacement and grasping will be analyzed with Datavyu. An instruction manual has been created to standardize video-coding procedures and define the reaching variables. Grasping will be defined from the moment the hand contacts the block to the time this is lifted from the surface. Arm displacement will be defined from end of grasping to block release. Reaching performance will be the summation of grasping and arm displacement. Two coders will be used to determine video-coding reliability.

The GMFM-IS determines the gross motor function of children with CP-A: lying and rolling, B: sitting, C: crawling, D: standing and E: walking, running & jumping. It is an abbreviated and validated version of the GMFM-66. It includes an algorithm with three critical items to decide which one of four item sets is most appropriate to assess motor function and obtain a GMFM-66 score. GMFM has been shown to be valid, reliable, and responsive to change in CP. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is 0.8-1.6 for medium effect size and 1.3-2.6 for large effect size.

The COPM will be used to investigate perceived parent- and child-based goals, and preferences that are specific to motor impediments in seated posture and reaching abilities that restrict participation. COPM can detect clinical important differences across time and above the MCID of 2 points.

The PEM-CY is a valid and reliable tool to measure participation-home, school and community-including environmental factors. PEM-CY can capture post-intervention changes in each of its dimensions in children with physical disabilities.

The theoretical framework, reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity of the SP&R-co has been validated in CP. It targets children with moderate-to-severe CP within a play-oriented framework. Similar to the SATCo, the SP&R-co follows a segment-by-segment approach to assess quantitatively sitting control across static, active, proactive (via bimanual and unimanual reaches), and reactive dimensions. Responsiveness has not been addressed, but the standard error measurement of each SP&R-co dimension are available.

We will follow the seated postural framework validated in the SP&R-co to capture motor improvements in the next tasks: (1) Static Seated Task: Postural orientation and balance in sitting during 10s. (2) Active Seated Task: Simultaneous control of the trunk and head rotations when the child visually follows an object to the right and left at a 90° angle. (3) Proactive Seated Task: Sitting control via anticipatory and compensatory postural adjustments during direction-specific reaches straight and 45° to the right and left.

The SATCo is a valid and reliable test in CP. The evaluator offers support at various trunk segments (shoulders, axillae, inferior angle of scapulae, on lower ribs, below lower ribs, and pelvis) to measure trunk control across 3 dimensions: static (during 5s), proactive (visually following an object), and reactive (postural responses to nudges). The score is from 1 (no head control) to 8 (full trunk control). Test responsiveness has not been established but studies show potential to identify trunk balance improvements in each of the tested trunk segments.