Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07500818

Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Bronchoscopy for Cryobiopsy in the Diagnosis of Interstitial Lung Disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) often requires histopathological confirmation when high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings are inconclusive. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy has emerged as a less invasive alternative to surgical lung biopsy, but diagnostic yield remains variable and dependent on biopsy location and procedural precision.

Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) combined with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) may allow more precise navigation to target lung segments and potentially improve biopsy quality and diagnostic yield.

This multi-center, investigator-initiated randomized controlled trial will compare conventional bronchoscopy with 2D fluoroscopy guidance versus robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with CBCT guidance for transbronchial lung cryobiopsy in patients undergoing diagnostic evaluation for suspected interstitial lung disease.

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either conventional bronchoscopy or robotic-assisted bronchoscopy. In both groups, four cryobiopsies will be obtained from two lung lobes using a 1.7 mm cryoprobe (en-bloc removal for both study arms).

The primary endpoint is the rate of definitive histological diagnosis as determined by a blinded multidisciplinary ILD board.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Histopathologic evaluation remains a key component in the diagnosis of many interstitial lung diseases when radiological and clinical findings are inconclusive. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) has increasingly replaced surgical lung biopsy due to its lower morbidity, but diagnostic yield varies widely depending on procedural technique and sampling accuracy.

Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) offers improved catheter stability and precise navigation to peripheral lung regions. When combined with cone-beam CT (CBCT), RAB allows real-time confirmation of biopsy location, potentially improving sampling of diagnostically relevant lung parenchyma while avoiding bronchial structures.

However, the incremental diagnostic value of RAB combined with CBCT compared with conventional bronchoscopy using fluoroscopy guidance has not yet been evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.

This investigator-initiated trial aims to determine whether robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with CBCT improves the rate of definitive histological diagnosis compared with conventional bronchoscopy.

Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either:

  • Conventional bronchoscopy with fluoroscopy-guided cryobiopsy
  • Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with CBCT-guided cryobiopsy

In both arms, four biopsies will be obtained from two different lung lobes using a 1.7 mm cryoprobe.

Histological specimens will be evaluated by a blinded multidisciplinary ILD board.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Clinical suspicion of interstitial lung disease requiring histological confirmation
  • Non-diagnostic HRCT pattern (e.g. probable UIP or indeterminate pattern)
  • Candidate for transbronchial lung cryobiopsy
  • Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Definite UIP pattern on HRCT
  • Severe pulmonary hypertension
  • Severe hypoxemia contraindicating bronchoscopy
  • Coagulopathy or contraindication to biopsy
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy With Cone-Beam CT Guidance

Procedure

Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy using a shape-sensing robotic platform with cone-beam CT confirmation of biopsy location. Four cryobiopsies will be obtained from two lung lobes using a 1.7 mm cryoprobe.

Conventional Bronchoscopy With Fluoroscopy Guidance

Procedure

Flexible bronchoscopy with 2D fluoroscopy guidance. Four cryobiopsies will be obtained from two lung lobes using a 1.7 mm cryoprobe.

Primary outcomes

  1. Histological Diagnosis

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Rate of Definitive Histological Diagnosis

Secondary outcomes

  1. Biopsy Size

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Mean cross-sectional area of cryobiopsy specimens measured in mm².

  2. Tissue Composition of Biopsies

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Percentage composition of biopsy specimens including:

    • Lung parenchyma
    • Bronchial tissue
    • Bronchiolar tissue
  3. Safety Composite

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours post procedure

    Composite safety endpoint including:

    • Clinically significant bleeding
    • Pneumothorax requiring intervention
    • Transfer to intensive care unit

Other outcomes

  1. Radiation Exposure

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Total radiation dose measured as dose-length product (DLP) or equivalent fluoroscopy dose.

  2. Procedure Duration

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Total procedure time measured from bronchoscope insertion to bronchoscope removal.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Thomas Gaisl, MD MPH PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+41762318339

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Zurich

Other

Collaborators

  • Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Switzerland
  • University Hospital, Zürich

Registry information

Official study title

Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Bronchoscopy for Cryobiopsy in the Diagnosis of Interstitial Lung Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Acronym: RAB-ILD-RCT

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Mar 30, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 30, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.