Brock University
St. Catharines, Ontario, L2S3A1, Canada
NCT Number: NCT07070388
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate four-weeks of an upper limb robotic intervention for persons with Multiple Sclerosis. Participants completed a resistive and adaptive robotic training intervention whereby participants trained three times weekly for four consecutive weeks.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
St. Catharines, Ontario, L2S3A1, Canada
Nine individuals with Multiple Sclerosis participated and were placed into two groups based that either trained their self-reported less affected limb (indirect training group; N=4) or trained their self-reported more affected limb (direct training group; N=5).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
For the robotic training sessions, a haptic wrist robot known as the Wristbot was used (ReWing, Genova, Italy). The training protocol consisted of an eccentric contraction-based exercise. Participants trained 3x per week for 4 consecutive weeks for approximately 25-mins per session.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and immediately post intervention (Week 4)
Participants were asked to complete one trial of a maximum grip test (Baseline Evaluation Instruments). Held with a straight arm, 45° abduction by the side and hand/wrist neutral, participants were asked to squeeze the handle as hard as possible for 3 seconds and grip force (Newton) was recorded.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and immediately post intervention (Week 4)
the participant's arm was fully extended and rested on the table, and participants were instructed to exert force at the wrist joint (F/E, RD/UD) as hard as they could against the stationary load cell that rested on the metacarpophalangeal joints (Model: BG 500, Mark-10 Corporation, New York, USA). Two maximal exertions were completed and the largest value was recorded.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and immediately post intervention (Week 4)
Participants were positioned in the same position as the training. By moving the end-effector with their wrist, participants tracked a moving icon around a Lissajous-curve. Participants were instructed to follow the icon as closely as possible. The target icon moved at a velocity of 20 °/s and 5 total laps were completed. Tracking and figural error were calculated as measures of performance.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and immediately post intervention (Week 4)
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and immediately post intervention (Week 4)
functional clinical assessment of the upper limb
Michael Holmes
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03963375
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02511028
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07175792
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Diepenbeek, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT07726667
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Gaziantep, Gaz, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details