Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
NCT Number: NCT03702582
This prospective, randomized, active-controlled, parallel arm study compares the safety and financial benefits of arterial thromboembolism prophylaxis with Warfarin vs. Rivaroxaban (A novel oral anticoagulant) in patients with new onset atrial fibrillation after sternotomy for cardiac operations.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
New onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is a common occurrence following cardiac surgery, occurring in 20-30% of patients post-operatively. Historically, Vitamin K antagonist therapy with Warfarin has been the treatment of choice for prophylaxis against stroke and systemic arterial thromboembolism in NOAF. Warfarin inhibits the Vitamin K dependent factors involved in both the intrinsic and extrinsic coagulation cascades, thus decreasing systemic clotting. However, Warfarin therapy comes with many challenges including prolonged titration, tedious monitoring requirements and in some cases, increased bleeding risk.
The limitations associated with Warfarin may be mitigated by using new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) like Rivaroxaban which have no routine monitoring requirements. Rivaroxaban is a direct inhibitor of Factor Xa, a central reactant in both the intrinsic and extrinsic coagulation cascades. Studies in non-operative patients with atrial fibrillation have shown that Rivaroxaban is non-inferior to Warfarin for stroke prophylaxis with similar risk profiles. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety and financial cost of these two drugs when used for the management of new onset atrial fibrillation that occurs after cardiac operations.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Anticoagulant drug that works via direct inhibition of factor Xa. FDA approved for prophylaxis against stroke in non-valvular atrial fibrillation
Other names: Xarelto, Database of Molecules (PubChem CID): 6433119
Anticoagulation drug that works via inhibition of vitamin K dependent clotting factors. FDA approved for prophylaxis against stroke in atrial fibrillation
Other names: Coumadin, Database of Molecules (PubChem CID): 54678486
Time frame: Up to 6 months following the cardiac operation
Length of inpatient stay in days from time of departure from the operating room
Time frame: Up to 30 days after discharge from the initial postoperative hospitalization
Major bleeding defined as re-operation or other therapeutic intervention for bleeding (including but not limited to colonoscopy, upper endoscopy and urologic procedures for hematuria), development of any intracranial bleeding, cessation of study drug for bleeding concerns, reversal of study drug for bleeding concerns and/or new transfusion requirement > 2 units of blood after drug administration
Time frame: Up to 30 days after discharge from the initial postoperative hospitalization
Rates of cerebrovascular accident including stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA)
Time frame: Up to 30 days after discharge from the initial postoperative hospitalization
Rates of non-neurological systemic arterial embolism involving any organ system
Time frame: Up to 30 days after discharge from the initial postoperative hospitalization
Occurrence of pathologic venous thrombo-embolism including DVT and PE
Time frame: Up to 30 days after discharge from the initial postoperative hospitalization
Minor bleeding defined as blood transfusions <= 2 units or drop in hemoglobin greater 3g/dL following administration of study drugs
Time frame: Up to 30 days after discharge from the initial postoperative hospitalization
Participants will be administered the EUROQOL-5D-3L (5 dimensions, 3 levels) questionnaire to derive an estimate of the health state. This is comprised of a 5 questions survey and a single visual analog scale highlighting perceived health levels
For the 5 questions survey, each question related to mobility, selfcare, mood, pain and/or functionality is answered on a three point scale with higher number representing worse outcomes. The entire dataset is used to generate a health state based on the unique pattern of answers. These health states are then compared against standardized country-based value sets which provide an assessment of quality of life based on societal preferences.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after discharge from the initial postoperative hospitalization
Participants will be administered the EUROQOL-5D-3L (5 dimensions, 3 levels) questionnaire to derive an estimate of the health state. This is comprised of a 5 questions survey and a single visual analog scale highlighting perceived health levels
For the 5 questions survey, each question related to mobility, selfcare, mood, pain and/or functionality is answered on a three point scale with higher number representing worse outcomes. The entire dataset is used to generate a health state based on the unique pattern of answers. These health states are then compared against standardized country-based value sets which provide an assessment of quality of life based on societal preferences.
The visual analog scale is single answer between 0 and 100 representing the patient's perception of their health state. 0 represents the worst health imaginable and 100 represents the best.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after discharge from the initial postoperative hospitalization
Participants will be administered the PACT-Q2 questionnaire which is comprised of a convenience subscale and a satisfaction subscale.
For the convenience subscale, each of 13 questions is answered on a 1-5 rating scale with higher numbers representing worse outcomes. A sub-scale score is generated by inverting the score from each element and calculating the sum. Range on the inverted scale is 13 - 65. Higher scores represent better outcomes.
For the satisfaction subscale, each of 7 questions is answered on a 1-5 rating scale with higher numbers representing better outcomes. The total score on this subscale is generated by adding up scores from all elements. Range on this subscale is 7-35. Higher scores represent better outcomes.
A composite score is generated by adding up scores from both subscales and recalibrating on a 0-100 scale by adding the scores together and applying the formula: COMPOSITE SCORE=100×(Sum-20)/80. Higher scores represent more favorable outcomes.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Other
Trial of New Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin for Post Cardiac Surgery Atrial Fibrillation
Acronym: NEW-AF
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05635864
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT05809596
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04068727
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04590898
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details