Hôpital Cochin
Paris, 75014, France
NCT Number: NCT02807103
Phase III, comparative, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind and superiority research, comparing rituximab-based regimen with conventional therapeutic strategy for the induction of remission in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA).
Patients with newly diagnosed or relapsing EGPA will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive:
* Experimental therapeutic strategy based on the use of rituximab (experimental group) * Conventional therapeutic strategy based on Five-Factor Score (FFS)-assessed disease severity (comparative group)
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Paris, 75014, France
Systemic vasculitides are inflammatory diseases of blood vessels, among which anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) are often severe with life-threatening manifestations or complications. AAV include granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA, formerly Churg-Strauss syndrome).
Cytotoxic drugs and glucocorticoids have been the standard of care for remission induction for nearly five decades. This regimen improved the outcome of severe AAV from death to a strong likelihood of disease control and temporary remission. However, a remission is not obtained in all patients with this combination of drugs, and most patients experience disease flares requiring repeated treatment with associated significant morbidity and mortality.
In 2 prospective controlled trials, rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, was shown to be non inferior to cyclophosphamide to induce remission with an acceptable safety profile in patients with systemic GPA and MPA. However, patients with EGPA were not included in these trials and rituximab has not been evaluated prospectively to induce remission in this disease which pathogenesis is complex and not only restricted to ANCA responsibility.
In patients with EGPA, overall survival is good when treatment is stratified according to prognostic factors (Five Factor Score) but long-term outcome is not so good since relapses occur in more than 40% of patients, leading to high cumulative morbidity and damage. In small retrospective studies, rituximab seems promising as a remission-induction agent in patients with EGPA, independently from the ANCA status.
The trial detailed here is the first prospective trial evaluating rituximab as induction-remission treatment for EGPA.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
1 g intravenous pulse at day1 and day15
Other names: Mabthera
intravenous pulses at day1 and day15
Other names: nacl
intravenous 9 pulses : 600 mg/m2 at days 1, 15 and 29, and then 500 mg-fixed dose at days 50, 71, 92, 113, 134 and 155.
Other names: endoxan
intravenous 7 pulses : at days 29, 50, 71, 92, 113, 134 and 155.
Other names: Nacl
Time frame: 180 days
Time frame: 180 days
expressed as adverse events according to the CTCAE toxicity grading system per patient-year for the following adverse events combined: death (all causes), grade 2 or higher leukopenia or thrombocytopenia, grade 3 or higher infections, hemorrhagic cystitis, malignancies, venous thromboembolic events, hospitalization resulting either from the disease or from a complication due to the study treatment, infusion reactions (within 24 hours of infusion) that result in the cessation of further infusions
Time frame: 360 days
expressed as adverse events according to the CTCAE toxicity grading system per patient-year for the following adverse events combined: death (all causes), grade 2 or higher leukopenia or thrombocytopenia, grade 3 or higher infections, hemorrhagic cystitis, malignancies, venous thromboembolic events, hospitalization resulting either from the disease or from a complication due to the study treatment, infusion reactions (within 24 hours of infusion) that result in the cessation of further infusions
Time frame: 180 days
To measure the corticosteroid dose and to compare the corticosteroid sparing effect of rituximab versus conventional therapy
Time frame: 360 days
To measure the corticosteroid dose and to compare the corticosteroid sparing effect of rituximab versus conventional therapy
Time frame: 180 days
Time frame: day 180 and day 360
Time frame: day 180 and day 360
Time frame: 180 days
to evaluate functional disability
Time frame: 360 days
to evaluate functional disability
Time frame: 180 days
to evaluate quality of life
Time frame: 360 days
to evaluate quality of life
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Other
Evaluation of Rituximab-based Regimen Compared to Conventional Therapeutic Strategy For Remission Induction In Patients With Newly-Diagnosed or Relapsing Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis. Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Study
Acronym: REOVAS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03482479
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis, Aortic Arch Syndromes
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06512883
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis, Autoimmune Diseases
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07444567
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis, Asthma
View Trial DetailsNCT02593565
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis, Aortic Arch Syndromes
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial Details