Rituximab
BiologicalGiven IV
Other names: IDEC-C2B8, Chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, Rituxan
NCT Number: NCT01415752
RATIONALE: Monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Others interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as bendamustine hydrochloride, also work in different ways to kill cancer cells or stop them from dividing. Bortezomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Lenalidomide may stop the growth of mantle cell lymphoma by blocking blood flow to the cancer. It is not yet known whether giving rituximab together with bendamustine and bortezomib is more effective than rituximab and bendamustine, followed by rituximab alone or with lenalidomide in treating mantle cell lymphoma.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial studies rituximab, bortezomib, bendamustine, and lenalidomide in treating previously untreated older patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–120 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
The Moncton Hospital, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
Secondary
Laboratory
Quality of Life
Imaging
Residual Disease Assessment by Molecular and Flow Cytometric Techniques
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to mantle cell lymphoma International Prognostic Index risk score (low vs intermediate vs high). Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms.
Patients may undergo blood and bone marrow sample collection at baseline and during treatment for correlative studies.
Patients complete the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym), the FACT/GOG-Neurotoxicity scale (FACT/GOG-Ntx), FACT-Fatigue, and FACT-General questionnaires at baseline and periodically during study and follow up.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually for 10 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Step 1 (Induction) Inclusion Criteria:
Step 1 (Induction) Exclusion Criteria:
Step 2 (Maintenance) Inclusion Criteria:
Given IV
Other names: IDEC-C2B8, Chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, Rituxan
Given IV
Other names: bendamustine hydrochloride, CEP-18083, TREANDA, BENDEKA
Given IV or SC
Other names: MLN341, LDP-341, Velcade®
Given PO
Other names: IMiDTM compound CC-5013, Revlimid®
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, every 3 months for 2.5 years, every 6 months up to 10 years from end of treatment, and then annually up to 10 years and 6 months
PFS is defined as time from randomization to lymphoma progression or death. Progression is defined as:
Time frame: Assessed at registration to step 2, cycles 6, 12, 18, treatment completion, then every 3 months for 2.5 years, every 6 months up to 10 years from end of treatment, and then annually up to 10 years and 6 months
PFS is defined as time from Step 2 registration to lymphoma progression or death. Progression is defined as:
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 24 weeks (end of cycle 6)
Objective response is defined as either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).
CR is defined as disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease, and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.
PR is defined as:
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 24 weeks (end of cycle 6)
Complete response is defined as disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease.
Time frame: Assessed every 3 months for 2.5 years, every 6 months for years 2.5-5
OS is defined as the time from registration of Step 2 (maintenance) until death from any cause or last know alive. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of 5-year OS rate is reported.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 months for 2 years
Objective response is defined as either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).
CR is defined as disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease, and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.
PR is defined as:
Time frame: Assessed at baseline
Collection of paraffin embedded tissue for creation of tissue microarray
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, end of cycle 3, end of cycle 6, every 4 months during first year of maintenance, every 6 months during 2nd year of maintenance, and 12 months after completion of maintenance
Collecting and banking serum and blood mononuclear cells for future studies
Time frame: Assessed at baseline
Collection of formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue for future analysis of potential prognostic factors
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 30, 36, 48 and 60 months
FACT/GOG-Ntx subscale has 11 items and the score ranges from 0 to 44. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 30, 36, 48 and 60 months
FACIT-Fatigue scale has 14 items and the score ranges from 0 to 56. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 30, 36, 48 and 60 months
FACT-G subscale has 27 items and the score ranges from 0 to 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 30, 36, 48 and 60 months
FACT/GOG-Ntx subscale has 11 items and the score ranges from 0 to 44. FACT-G has 27 items and the score ranges from 0 to 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life for both scales.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 30, 36, 48 and 60 months
FACT-Lymphoma has 15 items and the score ranges from 0 to 60. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 30, 36, 48 and 60 months
FACT-Lymphoma has 15 items and the score ranges from 0 to 60. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 30, 36, 48 and 60 months
The overall health-related quality of life is evaluated using FACT-G. FACT-G subscale has 27 items and the score ranges from 0 to 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 months for 2 years and every 6 months for years 3-10 and then annually up to 15 years
Assessment of the proportion of patients up and down staging when FDGPET/CT is added to standard Ann Arbor staging will be performed.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 months for 2 years and every 6 months for years 3-10 and then annually up to 15 years
To assess the ability of pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT semi quantitative parameters including SUVmax and metabolic measurements to predict response rate and PFS.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 months for 2 years and every 6 months for years 3-10 and then annually up to 15 years
Among patients with interim FDG-PET/CT imaging, to assess the correlation of interim FDG-PET/CT imaging with response rate and PFS both during induction and consolidation therapy.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 months for 2 years and every 6 months for years 3-10 and then annually up to 15 years
To assess standard FDG-PET/CT metrics including SUVmax, tumor metabolic burden, total tumor burden, and association with pathology features (blastoid variant vs. other, and Ki67) in the setting of MCL.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 months for 2 years
To assess differences in overall and complete response rates when using Deauville vs. International Harmonization Project FDG-PET/CT interpretation criteria.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 months for 2 years and every 6 months for years 3-10 and then annually up to 15 years
To determine whether there is a correlation between FDG-PET/CT response and residual disease assessment by molecular and/or flow cytometric techniques
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and end of cycle 6
To determine whether the number of malignant cells in circulation predict the number of cells in marrow
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 months for 2 years
To determine whether the number of malignant cells in circulation/in marrow at the end of induction correlate with CR and 2 year PFS
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, end of cycles 3 and 6, every 4 months during 1st year of maintenance, every 6 months during 2nd year of maintenance and 12 months after completion of maintenance
Minimal residual disease (MRD) will be evaluated using blood samples and bone marrow samples collected on this study.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, end of cycles 3 and 6, every 4 months during 1st year of maintenance, every 6 months during 2nd year of maintenance and 12 months after completion of maintenance
MRD levels will be evaluated using two different methods, molecular techniques and flow cytometry. The difference in MRD levels between the two methods will be assessed.
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Network
Intergroup Randomized Phase 2 Four Arm Study In Patients ≥ 60 With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma Of Therapy With: Arm A = Rituximab+ Bendamustine Followed By Rituximab Consolidation (RB → R); Arm B = Rituximab + Bendamustine + Bortezomib Followed By Rituximab Consolidation (RBV→ R), Arm C = Rituximab + Bendamustine Followed By Lenalidomide + Rituximab Consolidation (RB → LR) or Arm D = Rituximab + Bendamustine + Bortezomib Followed By Lenalidomide + Rituximab Consolidation (RBV → LR)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05495464
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06852638
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Shanghai, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06854003
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03295240
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States
View Trial Details