Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01388244

Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation Study (ROSE)

The Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation Study (ROSE) is a randomised population-based study, including 20,904 Danish women aged 65-80 years, investigating the effectiveness of a two-step screening programme for osteoporosis, using a questionnaire based on FRAX® followed by DXA-scan of those at highest risk. Further, the study is expected to provide knowledge about cost-effectiveness, patient preferences and acceptance of screening programme to prevent fractures

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Dept. of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital

Odense, 5000, Denmark

About this study

Osteoporosis is highly prevalent especially in postmenopausal women. Approximately 46 % of all women will suffer at least one osteoporotic fracture after the age of 50. The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) recommend screening with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in all women aged 65 years and above regardless of risk factors. Nevertheless, the use of clinical risk factors has been shown to enhance the risk-gradient and accuracy of fracture risk prediction. The FRAX risk assessment score was derived from large population-based cohorts and validated in separate validation cohorts. Its use as a risk assessment tool is endorsed by WHO, but no prospective studies examining the effect of a screening programme using a combination of FRAX and DXA in a two-step manner have been performed previously.

35,000 women aged 65-80 years were selected at random from the population in the Region of Southern Denmark and -before inclusion-randomised to either a screening group or a control group. As first step, a self- administered questionnaire regarding risk factors for osteoporosis based on FRAX® was issued to both groups. As second step, subjects in the screening group with a 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures ≥15 % were offered a DXA scan. Patients diagnosed with osteoporosis from the DXA scan were advised to see their GP and discuss pharmaceutical treatment according to Danish National guidelines.

The primary outcome is incident clinical fractures as evaluated through annual follow-up using the Danish National Patient Registry. The secondary outcomes are cost-effectiveness, participation rate and patient preferences. The aim of the ROSE study is to investigate the effectiveness of a two-step population based osteoporosis screening programme using FRAX® based on self-administered questionnaire to select women for DXA followed by the standard osteoporosis treatment according to national guidelines and delivered by GPs in the Region of Southern Denmark. Secondary aims are to clarify whether the screening programme is cost-effective and to assess the patients' preferences, experience and acceptance of the screening programme. Moreover, sub-studies allow assessment of the effectiveness of FRAX® alone or combined with individual clinical risk factors in the prediction of fractures and the impact of socioeconomic factors for participation and outcome.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women
  • Age 65-80 years
  • Inhabitants of the Region of Southern Denmark

Exclusion criteria

  • Self-reported use of antiosteoporotic treatment and a diagnose of osteoporosis
  • Unability to give informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Screening

Other

Screening by risk factor assessment (FRAX) followed by DXA

Other names: DXA scan

Control

Other

Observation by use of register data

Primary outcomes

  1. The effect of screening for osteoporosis with a two-step programme involving FRAX risk score followed by DXA for the prevention of hip fracture and other osteoporosis-related fracture events

    Time frame: Three years follow-up on average

    Comparison of register data concerning hospitalizations for primarily hip fracture between the intervention and control group as a whole. Power calculations suggest three years of followup on average, but this time frame could be increased if participation falls short.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cost-effectiveness / cost-utility of a two-step screening programme.

    Time frame: Three years follow-up on average

    Comparison of register-based health related costs due to antiosteoporotic medications combined with generated costs due to hospitalizations for osteoporosis-related fractures. Follow-up time is defined by the primary outcome measure

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Odense University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
  • University of Southern Denmark

Registry information

Acronym: ROSE

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jul 6, 2011
Registry last updated
Nov 2, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.