UNC Lineberger
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
NCT Number: NCT05722847
This study explores whether supportive care interventions that might reduce rehospitalization could be implemented and feasible, in subjects within a high-risk group of subjects with newly diagnosed hospitalized advanced lung cancer (ALC).
This study screened 50 subjects from health records and consented to 15 of these screened subjects. These 15 subjects responded to PRO questionnaires.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Subjects will be considered high risk if they have small cell histology, longer than 8 days hospitalization, high comorbidity, emergency department use or hospitalization in the previous 6 months, prescription of a wheelchair on hospital discharge, or Black and/or Hispanic race. Supportive care interventions such as navigation and palliative care will be recommended for this group.
All hospitalized subjects with newly diagnosed ALC will be offered web- or telephone-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) symptom monitoring for 90 days following hospital discharge if they provide consent. Medical record evaluation of consented subjects will provide data for risk assessment and the high-risk group definition. Healthcare utilization including emergency department visits, hospitalizations, outpatient palliative care, and cancer treatment received will be compared.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
for Patient Participants:
For PROs only
Exclusion criteria
for Patient Participants:
Inclusion criteria
for Health Care Provider Participants:
Time frame: Up to 5 days
The success of the risk-based stratification system implementation- contacted will be determined by the ratio of subjects who were contacted to the whole group is equal to or higher than 70%, in the high-risk group.
Time frame: Up to 5 days
The success of the risk-based stratification system implementation- referred will be determined by the ratio of subjects who were referred to the whole group is equal to or higher than 70%, in the high-risk group.
Time frame: Up to 16 days
The success of the risk-based stratification system implementation- navigation will be determined by the ratio of subjects who received guidance to the whole group is equal to or higher than 70%, in the high-risk group.
Time frame: Up to 16 days
The success of the risk-based stratification system implementation - palliative care will be determined by the ratio of subjects who received palliative care to the whole group is equal to or higher than 70%, in the high-risk group.
Time frame: Up to 90 days
The time to receipt of outpatient palliative care will be defined as the time between the date of palliative care and hospital discharge based on the high-risk and low-risk groups.
Time frame: Up to 180 days
Acceptability of the supportive care intervention will be assessed by the percentage of subjects who attend supportive care consultations as determined through electronic health records ( EHR) review.
Time frame: Up to 90 days
Acceptability of the risk stratification system time to complete for providers will be assessed by the time to complete risk stratification per subject.
Time frame: Up to 90 days
Acceptability of the risk stratification system time to complete the thoracic oncology clinical team will be assessed by the perceived usefulness to the thoracic oncology clinical team
Time frame: Up to 90 days
Implementation of patient reported outcomes (PRO)-based symptom monitoring will be determined by the percentage of eligible subjects who complete weekly PROs and the percentage of concerning symptoms reported to the clinical team of more than 70.
Time frame: Up to 90 days
Implementation of PRO-based symptom monitoring will be determined by the percentage of concerning symptoms reported to the clinical team.
Time frame: Up to 90 days
Acceptability of PRO-based symptom monitoring to subjects will be measured by the percentage of eligible subjects who agree to participate in the patient-reported outcome report (PRO) system (success: >66%).
Time frame: Up to 90 days
Acceptability of PRO-based symptom monitoring to the clinical team will be determined by the percentage of concerning symptoms resulting in action by any member of the clinical team.(success: >75% reporting somewhat useful, useful, or very useful).
Time frame: Up to 90 days
Acceptability of PRO-based symptom monitoring to the clinical team will be determined by the percentage of concerning symptoms perceived usefulness to the thoracic oncology clinical team (success: >75% reporting somewhat useful, useful, or very useful).
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Other
Development of an Enhanced Risk Stratification System for Patients With Hospital-diagnosed Advanced Lung Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00340405
Lung Cancer, Lung Diseases
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03117946
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Neoplasms
Besançon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05832008
Adherence, Patient, Behavior
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06084208
Lung Cancer, Lung Diseases
Nijmegen, Netherlands
View Trial Details