Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01452802

Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) and Medical Management

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the HeartMate II (HM II) Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) support versus OMM in ambulatory NYHA Class IIIB/IV heart failure patients who are not dependent on intravenous inotropic support and who meet the FDA approved indications for HM II LVAD destination therapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Baptist Medical Center, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The HeartMate II (HM II) LVAD is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in destination therapy (DT) patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IIIB/IV symptoms.

The ROADMAP trial is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, controlled, observational study that is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of HM II LVAD support versus optimal medical management (OMM) in ambulatory NYHA Class IIIB/IV heart failure patients who are not dependent on intravenous inotropic support and who meet the FDA approved indications for HM II LVAD destination therapy. Subjects will be enrolled in one of two cohorts: OMM or LVAD. Together with the investigator, the subjects will decide which cohort to enter into at their baseline visit. This study will include experienced HM II LVAD implant centers as well as community centers that care for a large volume of heart failure patients. Study patients will be followed for up to 24 months post enrollment for survival, quality of life and functional status.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

The following are general criteria; more specific criteria are included in the study protocol:

Inclusion criteria

  • NYHA Class IIIB/IV (refer to Appendix IV for definitions)
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 25%
  • Not currently listed for heart transplantation, and not planned in next 12 months
  • On optimal medical management
  • Limited functional status as demonstrated by 6MWT <300 meters
  • At least:
  • One hospitalization for HF in last 12 months or
  • At least 2 unscheduled emergency room or infusion clinic visits (may include intravenous diuretic therapy, etc.) for HF in last 12 months

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of mechanical aortic or mitral valve, including planned conversion to bioprosthesis
  • Platelet count < 100,000/mi within 48 prior to enrollment
  • Any inotrope use within 30 days prior to enrollment
  • Inability to perform 6MWT for any reason
  • Any condition, other than heart failure, that could limit survival to less than 2 years
  • History of cardiac or other organ transplant
  • Existence of any ongoing mechanical circulatory support (including intraaortic balloon pump, temporary circulatory support devices, etc.) at the time of enrollment
  • Presence of active, uncontrolled, systemic infection
  • History of an unresolved stroke within 90 days prior to enrollment, or a history of cerebral vascular disease with significant (> 80%)extracranial stenosis
  • Contraindication to anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy
  • CRT or CRT-D within 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Coronary revascularization (e.g. CABG, PCI) within 3 months prior to enrollment

Treatment and study plan

HM II (HeartMate II LVAD)

Device

The HM II pump contains a single moving component, the rotor. The pump is implanted just below the left hemidiaphragm with the inflow attached to the apex of the left ventricle and the outflow graft anastomosed to the ascending aorta. Blood is pumped continuously throughout the cardiac cycle from the left ventricle to the aorta.

Other names: Left Ventricular Assist Device

OMM (Optimal Medical Management)

Drug

Optimal medical management per established heart failure guidelines for this subject population including ACE inhibitors, beta blockers and aldosterone antagonists 45 out of the last 60 days or an inability to tolerate neurohormonal antagonists.

Other names: Medical Management

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite of survival with improvement in Six Minute Hallway Walk Test distance from baseline of ≥ 75m.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Risk stratified subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint and temporal analysis of primary endpoint.

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

  2. Accuracy of prognostic survival risk models including Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) and HeartMate II Risk Score (HMRS)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6, 12, 18 and 24 months

  3. Actuarial survival and survival free of stroke: a) intent-to-treat; and b) as treated.

    Time frame: 24 months

  4. Survival in LVAD group free of pump replacement.

    Time frame: 24 months

  5. Quality of Life using the EQ-5D-5L Health Utility Index.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6, 12, 18 and 24 months

  6. Depression using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).

    Time frame: Baseline and 6, 12, 18 and 24 months

  7. Questionnaire on patient decisions related to LVAD therapy versus optimal medical management.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6, 12, 18 and 24 months

  8. Functional status using 6MWT distance and NYHA Classification

    Time frame: Baseline and 6, 12, 18 and 24 months

  9. Incidence of adverse events, rehospitalizations, days alive and not hospitalized.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Abbott Medical Devices

Industry

Collaborators

  • Thoratec Corporation

Registry information

Official study title

Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients

Acronym: ROADMAP

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Oct 17, 2011
Registry last updated
Jun 24, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.