Kantonsspital St. Gallen
Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen, 9007, Switzerland
NCT Number: NCT02293590
Tight control of an adaptive concomitant treatment strategy after initiation of CZP will lead to an improved outcome of RA patients with an active disease despite DMARD treatment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen, 9007, Switzerland
Certolizumab pegol (CZP) is a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist which is marketed for the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (Keystone, 2008) when given in combination with methotrexate (MTX). CZP is a PEGylated Fab' fragment of humanized anti-TNF antibody with a high affinity for TNF.
RA is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease with multiple treatment strategies and combination therapies available including analgesia, anti-inflammatory drugs and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Previous trials have demonstrated positive results from the use of CZP but have compared its use to placebo in a fixed dose concomitant medication regime rather than using a more realistic dynamic treatment strategy normally employed in the clinical outpatient care of RA.
This trial is aimed at comparing the use of CZP in patients with moderate to severe RA when administered in conjunction with an intensive, adapted treatment strategy (Group A) versus a fixed-dosed program (Group B). CZP will be given in conjunction with MTX (a disease modifying anti-arthritic drug - or DMARD), steroidal therapy in the form of prednisolone and joint infiltrations of triamcinolone (another corticosteroid) and lidocaine (a pain therapy). Both treatment arms will include these concomitant medications but there will be an intensive adaptive approach adopted for the 'treat to target' population of Group A with a more fixed-dose approach set-out for Group B. Patients will be centrally randomized after screening to ensure a 50:50 ratio for both Groups in the study.
STUDY HYPOTHESIS
Tight control of an adaptive concomitant treatment strategy after initiation of CZP will lead to an improved outcome of RA patients with an active disease despite DMARD treatment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: Cimcia, Methoject, Lederlon, Leflunomid Gebro, Salazopyrin EN, Spiricort, Xyloneural
Time frame: 24 weeks
Efficacy rates as measured by the percentage of study participants achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) clinical response by the Week 24
Time frame: 8, 12, 18 and 24 weeks
Efficacy rates as measured by ACR20/50/70 at weeks 8, 12, 18 and 24 weeks to determine the % of treatment responders in each study Group over the study period.
Time frame: weeks 8, 12, 18 and 24
Efficacy rates as measured by patients achieving Low DAS is defined (LDAS) or a full clinical remission according to the EULAR at weeks 8, 12, 18 and 24 weeks. LDAS as a DAS-28 score of less than 3.2. The DAS-28 is defined by the number of tender and swollen joints calculated from 28 joints mainly from the upper limbs, the ESR and the patient's global assessment of disease activity.
Remission will be defined as a DAS-28 score of less than 2.6 and/or according to the Boolean definition of remission (Felson 2011): swollen joint count, tender joint count, patients' global assessment of disease activity, CRP (mg/dl) all ≤1*
Time frame: weeks 8, 12, 18 and 24
Efficacy rates as measured by the average number of weeks of treatment required for patients to reach remission of their RA. Clinical remission to be evaluated via the EULAR and DAS-remission criteria
Time frame: 24 weeks
Efficacy as calculated of the cumulative corticosteroid dose for patients completing the 24 week study period across the two treatment groupsCalculation of the cumulative corticosteroid dose for patients completing the 24 week study period across the two treatment groups
Time frame: 8, 12, 18 and 24 weeks
Safety as calculated by the occurrence of treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE, adverse events occurring after baseline of the study) across the two treatment groups
Time frame: 24 weeks
Efficacy analysis as analysed by a pharmacokinetic assessments are to be conducted at Visit 3/week 4 (day 28) and visit 7/Week 24 (Day 168 post initiation of CZP treatment)
Time frame: 24 weeks
Efficacy analysis as analysed two single timepoint anti-CZP antibody assessments are to be conducted at Visit 2/Week 0 and Visit 7/Week 24 (Day 168 post initiation of CZP treatment)
Rüdiger B. Müller
Other
An Open Label, Randomised Study to Compare the Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) Plus a Dynamic or Fixed Dose Treatment Strategy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis, a Phase II Study
Acronym: RICE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03649178
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03025308
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07715045
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT00055055
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details