Rheumatic Heart Disease School Project

Background

Acute rheumatic Fever (ARF) results from an autoimmune response due to molecular mimicry between the M-protein on the group A β-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS) cell membrane and cardiac myosin, and may lead through recurrent or sustained inflammation to Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD) (1). RHD is reported to affect over 15 million people worldwide and remains a major contributor to morbidity and premature death in the working age population in developing countries (2). Socioeconomic determinants such as poverty, overcrowding, and malnutrition have been related to RHD. The prevalence of ARF and RHD seems to be particularly high in Southeast Asia, the Western Pacific and Africa (3). Whereas heart murmurs detected on clinical examination may indicate clinically manifest RHD, echocardiographic screening revealed ten times higher prevalence rates of RHD among schoolchildren (4) and may help diagnose RHD at an earlier, "clinically silent" stage.

Patients with a past medical history of ARF or RHD are recommended secondary prevention with regular oral or intravenous administration of penicillin continued until early adulthood.

Even though preventive measures with penicillin are inexpensive and efficient, this strategy is difficult to effectuate in developing countries with limited access to health care resources.

A recent study proved that enrolling patients with ARF and RHD in a registry with close follow-up increases compliance to treatment and thus helps in reducing the cardiovascular sequelae associated with disease progression (5).

The prevalence of RHD among schoolchildren in urban and rural areas in Nepal is largely unknown, and risk factors associated with prognosis of the disease after receiving medical care at various stages of disease at diagnosis need to be determined. Moreover, the impact of screening using echocardiography, detecting RHD at an earlier, "clinically silent" stage of RHD on health resource utilization has to be determined.

Objective

Originally, three main inter-related objectives were to be pursued in three phases of the study: In the first phase using a cross sectional approach, the prevalence of clinical and subclinical RHD were to be investigated among a representative sample of schoolchildren from public and private schools in urban and rural areas. In the second phase, using a cohort study approach among those children diagnosed at different stages of RHD, clinical outcomes with regular medical surveillance were to be assessed (a), and clinical and social risk factors associated with prognosis of the disease after receiving medical care at various stages of disease at diagnosis were to be determined (b). A third phase was to integrate the prevalence rates from phase 1 and the clinical outcomes from phase 2 in a mathematical model to assess the impact of screening and RHD treatment on quality of life and health resource utilization.

On August 14 2013, the Nepal Health Research Council required the introduction of a control group in the design of the Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD) School Project. The original design included a random sampling stratified by urban versus rural location and public versus private status of schools, with a computer-generated random sequence used to determine which schools would be centrally selected during Phase 1 of the project to undergo screening for RHD. The original computer-generated random sequence was therefore used to determine which schools would be randomly selected as control schools which did not undergo the screening intervention during Phase 1, but would be selected for follow-up during Phase 2 of the project. This approach implicitly allowed for a cluster randomized comparison between intervention and control schools at follow-up in children aged 5 to 12 years at baseline, when phase 1 of the study took place.

Methods

The project will employ three types of study designs performed in sequential phases: a cross sectional study (part 1), a longitudinal cohort study (part 2) and an analysis of the impact of screening, secondary prevention and treatment on health resource utilization (part 3).

• Part 1: Cross-Sectional Survey Schoolchildren aged 5-16 years will be screened at selected schools in the Southeast area of Nepal. A follow-up examination will be performed in a subset of schools that underwent screening at baseline and in all control schools, allowing for a cluster randomized comparison at follow-up between schools that underwent screening at baseline and control schools in children aged 5 to 12 years at baseline.
• Part 2: Longitudinal Cohort Study Those children with documented history of ARF and/or RHD will be included into a prospective registry and receive secondary prevention will be followed on a regular basis.
• Part 3: Impact of Screening and Treatment of RHD The third phase will integrate the prevalence rates from phase 1 and the clinical outcomes from phase 2 in a mathematical model to assess the impact of screening and RHD treatment on health resource utilization.

Inclusion criteria

• Schoolchildren in Southeast Nepal aged 5-16 years
• Written informed consent by the principal of the school
• Passive consent from the parents

Exclusion criteria

• No formal exclusion criteria apply