Rheos® Baroreflex Hypertension System
DeviceElectrical activation of the Carotid Baroreflex
NCT Number: NCT00442286
The purpose of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the Rheos system in subjects with hypertension that are resistant to treatment with at least three anti-hypertension agents, one of which is a diuretic.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hanover, Germany
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Electrical activation of the Carotid Baroreflex
Time frame: 6 months post-activation
Compare Group A (Rheos® Device On ) versus Group B (Rheos® Device Off) via a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, super-superiority design for proportion of subjects that achieve at least a 10 mm Hg drop in systolic blood pressure at Month 6 compared to Month 0, with a superiority margin of 20%.
Time frame: 12 months post-activation
Compare the sustained response in SBP Month 12 in Group A ( Rheos® Device On ) responders at Month 6 to an objective performance criterion of 65%. A sustained response to therapy required the reduction from Month 0 to Month 12 to be at least 10 mmHg and to remain at least 50% of that seen at Month 6.
Time frame: 30 days post implant
Compare the serious procedure- or system-related adverse event-free rate for events occurring within 30 days of implant to a pre-specified objective performance criterion of 82% set based on historical literature on implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) and pacemakers.
Note: The purpose of this outcome measure was to evaluate the effect of having the device implanted, not to compare the outcomes between the two treatment groups. Therefore, both groups were analyzed as a single cohort.
Time frame: 12 months-post activation
Compare the event-free rate for all major hypertension-related and serious device-related adverse events occurring between 30 days post-implant and the Month 12 visit, to a pre-specified objective performance criterion of 72% based on similar implantable devices such as defibrillators and resynchronization devices.
Note: The purpose of this outcome measure was to evaluate the effect of having the device implanted, not to compare the outcomes between the two treatment groups. Therefore, both groups were analyzed as a single cohort.
Time frame: 6 months post-activation
Compare Group A (Rheos® Device On ) versus Group B (Rheos® Device Off) therapy-related adverse event-free rates via a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, non-inferiority design for therapy-related serious adverse events occurring between 30 days post-implant and the Month 6 visit. The non-inferiority margin was 15%.
CVRx, Inc.
Industry
Rheos® Pivotal Trial: Rheos™ Baroreflex Hypertension Therapy System
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02439775
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05820295
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06380322
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Fort Carson, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06961981
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
View Trial Details