United States, Massachusetts
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, 02467, United States
NCT Number: NCT05133739
This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, blinded evaluator, multicenter, between subjects clinical study to identify whether RHA4 is non-inferior to a comparator device for treatment of midface volume deficiency 8 weeks after the last treatment (initial or touch-up).
At Screening, the treating investigator (TI) and the Blinded Live Evaluator (BLE) will evaluate independently the subject's midface using the validated 5-grade Teoxane Midface Volume Deficit Scale (TMVDS) for eligibility of the subject for the study. The BLE will establish a pretreatment score for assessment of effectiveness.
If the assessments of the TI and the BLE are the same or differ exactly by 1 point of the scale, the difference will be considered acceptable. The TI and the BLE need to agree that the subject meets the eligibility criterion (TMVDS grade 2 to 3). If the subject is eligible, the BLE's assessment will be used for the Baseline of the primary endpoint.
Eligible subjects will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio at Screening to receive RHA4 or comparator product.
The TI will administer the fillers, and if necessary, subjects will receive a touch-up treatment with the same product that they received on Visit 1, 4 weeks after the initial treatment to optimize the results. If the touch-up treatment is administered, the subject will be asked to come to the site for an additional visit 4 weeks after the touch-up injection.
Subjects will be followed for 52 weeks after their last treatment (initial treatment or touch-up), at which point, they will be offered re-treatment with RHA® 4, regardless of their original treatment, provided that the TI deems the treatment to be appropriate and the subject agrees. Reasons for not administering the re-treatment will be documented.
The subject will then be followed for an additional 12 weeks before exiting the study. If the subject or the TI declines re-treatment, this visit (52 weeks after the last treatment) will be considered the study Exit visit.
For subjects with re-treatment, the Exit visit will be 12 weeks after the re-treatment.
The TI will conduct safety and effectiveness evaluations at each study visit, which will occur: at 4 weeks after the initial and touch-up treatment, 8, 24, and 52 weeks after the last treatment, and after re treatment or until all treatment-related ongoing adverse events (AEs) have resolved or resolved with sequelae as per TI judgment or if follow-up is no longer possible.
A follow-up telephone call for safety will be performed 3 days after each treatment.
Subjects will report their common treatment responses (CTRs) in a subject diary for 30 days after each injection. The diary will also include a list of selected AEs potentially associated with injection of dermal fillers for subjects to report if applicable. All efforts should be made by the TI to schedule the applicable visits to allow completion of the CTR diary.
A BLE will conduct assessments of effectiveness during the study, including assessment of the primary endpoint 8 weeks after the last treatment.
The BLE will be blinded to allocation to groups (RHA4 group or comparator product group).
Furthermore, to ensure that they remain blinded and unbiased when making their assessments throughout the study, the BLE, TI, and subjects will not be allowed to refer to each other's effectiveness assessments. All subjects will be instructed to not discuss their study treatment, AEs, or CTRs with the BLE.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me22 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, 02467, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
RHA® 4 is a sterile, biodegradable, biocompatible, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenized gel implant. It consists of cross-linked hyaluronic acid produced by fermentation of Streptococcus equi bacteria, formulated to a concentration of 23 mg/mL and 0.3% w/w lidocaine in a physiologic buffer.
Up to 3.0 mL injected per cheek (subcutaneous and/or supraperiosteal layer). Touch-up treatment provided at 4 weeks (up to 3.0 mL per cheek).
Comparator product is sterile, biodegradable, colorless gel of hyaluronic acid generated by Streptococcus species of bacteria, chemically crosslinked with BDDE.
Up to 3.0 mL injected per cheek (subcutaneous and/or supraperiosteal layer). Touch-up treatment provided at 4 weeks (up to 3.0 mL per cheek).
Time frame: 8 weeks after the last treatment
A change in the TMVDS ≥1 grade compared to pretreatment will be considered clinically meaningful.
In order to confirm sensitivity 8 weeks after the last treatment: the proportion of responders with a ≥1-grade point on the TMVDS scale for Comparator product 8 weeks after the last treatment when compared to Baseline must be ≥70%.
The TMVDS is a validated 5-point scale for assessing midface volume deficit. Possible scores range from 0 (Absent) to 4 (Very Severe).
Time frame: Week 24, 52 after last treatment, week 12 after re-treatment
A change in the TMVDS ≥1 grade compared to pre-treatment will be considered clinically meaningful.
The TMVDS is a validated 5-point static scale for assessing midface volume deficit. Possible scores range from 0 (Absent) to 4 (Very Severe).
Time frame: Week 8, 24, 52 after last treatment, week 12 after re-treatment
he Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) is a subjective, balanced, 5-point dynamic scale assessing cosmetic improvement.
Possible scores range from "much improved", "improved", "no change", "worse", to "much worse".
Time frame: Change from Baseline at Weeks 8, 24, 52 after last treatment,12 weeks after re-treatment
The FACE-Q measures the experience and outcomes of aesthetic facial procedures from the patient's perspective.
The FACE-Q questionnaire is composed of 5 questions with a score linked to answers (1 being "Very Dissatisfied" and 4 being "Very Satisfied").
To calculate the FACE-Q score, outcomes from all 5 questions were pooled, data were transformed so that higher scores reflected a superior (positive) outcome, and adapted to a scale of 100 units (i.e. worst/lowest score = 0, best/highest score = 100).
Time frame: Change from Baseline at Weeks 8, 24, 52 after last treatment and 12 week after re-treatment.
The FACE-Q measures the experience and outcomes of aesthetic facial procedures from the patient's perspective.
The FACE-Q questionnaire is composed of 5 questions with a score linked to answers (1 being "Very Dissatisfied" and 4 being "Very Satisfied").
To calculate the FACE-Q score, outcomes from all 5 questions were pooled, data were transformed so that higher scores reflected a superior (positive) outcome, and adapted to a scale of 100 units (i.e. worst/lowest score = 0, best/highest score = 100).
Time frame: Week 8, 24, 52 after last treatment, week 12 after re-treatment
The Subject Satisfaction Scale is a subjective, balanced, 5-point scale assessing subject satisfaction with study treatment. Possible scores range from with 1 (very satisfied) to 5 (very dissatisfied).
Teoxane SA
Industry
A Randomized, Blinded Evaluator, Multicenter, Prospective, Between-subjects Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of RHA®4 for the Treatment of Midface Volume Deficiency
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04534660
Cheek Augmentation, Nasolabial Fold
Encinitas, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04638816
Cheek Augmentation
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT03700047
Cheek Augmentation
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03160716
Cheek Augmentation, Midface Contour Deficiencies
Beverly Hills, California, United States
View Trial Details