FSU MRI Facility
Tallahassee, Florida, 32306, United States
NCT Number: NCT05468853
The objective of this study is to examine the effect of intermittent theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTBS) targeting the reward circuit.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tallahassee, Florida, 32306, United States
The study will examine the effect of medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC)-iTBS on the reward circuit, reward sensitivity, and anhedonia. The reward circuit will be assessed using functional MRI (fMRI) connectivity and activation during the Doors Task. Reward sensitivity will be assessed using an event-related potential called the reward positivity or RewP. The RewP will be measured using electroencephalography (EEG) during the Doors Task. Anhedonia will be measured using the Dimensional Anhedonia Ratings Scale (DARS).
The Doors Task was designed to examine reward processing in a simple, well-controlled paradigm. On each trial, participants select one of two doors. Gain (50 cents) or loss (25 cents) feedback is provided. Gains elicit a positive potential referred to as the RewP, while losses elicit a negative potential referred to as the feedback reward negativity (FRN). Gains also show increased activation in reward-related brain areas (e.g. ventral striatum) relative to losses in the fMRI signal.
Each participant will complete a baseline session including structural MRI, fMRI and EEG during the Doors task, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) motor thresholding. The ventral striatum (VS) will be identified on the structural MRI. The MPFC will be identified as a rostral-medial cortical area in prefrontal cortex with high connectivity to the VS. A control site, inion, will be identified using visual inspection of the skull.
Each participant will complete 2 weeks of iTBS sessions. Each week will target a different site (experimental: MPFC; control: inion). iTBS will be performed once a day for 5 consecutive days at each site, with order counter-balanced across participants in a cross-over design. 1 week of washout will follow each week of iTBS. At the end of each week, participants will perform the Doors task while being measured with EEG, and complete the DARS. At the end of the iTBS weeks, participants will also perform the Doors task while being measured with fMRI.
fMRI activation of the MPFC target and VS, and VS-MPFC fMRI connectivity will be compared at baseline, following the MPFC-iTBS week, and following the control-iTBS week. Changes specific to MPFC-iTBS will provide evidence of the effect of MPFC-iTBS on the reward circuit. The RewP and DARS will be compared at baseline, and after each week, respectively. Changes specific to MPFC-iTBS will provide evidence of the effect of MPFC-iTBS on the reward sensitivity and anhedonia. Changes that persist following washout will provide an indication of a lasting effect of MPFC-iTBS.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered to the scalp targeting medial prefrontal cortex
Time frame: baseline, one-hour post-intervention, one-week post-intervention
change in self-reported anhedonia from baseline averaged across post-intervention and post-washout measured using the score on the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS); score range is 0-68 with higher scores meaning better outcomes (less anhedonia)
Time frame: baseline, 1 hour post-intervention
change in self-reported anhedonia from baseline immediately following the intervention measured using the score on the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS); score range is 0-68 with higher scores meaning better outcomes (less anhedonia)
Time frame: baseline, 1 week post-intervention
change in self-reported anhedonia from baseline following a week of washout post-intervention measured using the score on the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS); score range is 0-68 with higher scores meaning better outcomes (less anhedonia)
Time frame: baseline, immediately post-intervention, one-week post-intervention
change in reward positivity from baseline averaged across immediately post-intervention and post-washout assessed via the EEG event-related potential (ERP) to feedback over FCz in microvolts
Time frame: baseline, immediately post-intervention
change in reward positivity from baseline immediately following the intervention assessed via the EEG event-related potential (ERP) to feedback over FCz in microvolts
Time frame: baseline, 1 week post-intervention
change in reward positivity from baseline immediately following a week of washout post-intervention assessed via the EEG event-related potential (ERP) to feedback over FCz in microvolts
Time frame: baseline, 15 minutes post-intervention
Change in reward-related activation in the ventral striatum assessed via the fMRI blood-oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal following feedback (arbitrary units). More positive values indicate greater activation relative to baseline (more reward-related signal).
Time frame: baseline, 15 minutes post-intervention
Change in fMRI connectivity between ventral striatum and medial prefrontal cortex assessed via correlations in the fMRI blood-oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal between these areas (z-scored correlation coefficient). More positive values indicate more positive correlations in BOLD signals between the ventral striatum and medial prefrontal cortex relative to baseline.
Florida State University
Other
Manipulating the Reward Circuit With TMS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06694402
Chronic Pain, Chronic Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT06919172
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07138677
Alzheimer's Disease, Individualized Navigation
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06783361
Accelerated Protocol, Bilateral rTMS
Erzurum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details